Literature DB >> 22244858

Self-reported symptoms on questionnaires and anatomic lesions on duplex ultrasound examinations in patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Moniek van Zitteren1, Patrick W Vriens, Jan M Heyligers, Desiree H Burger, Maria J Nooren, W Marnix de Fijter, Johan Denollet, Kim G Smolderen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Whether a typical patient and symptom profile is associated with proximal or distal lesions in lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is unknown. Knowing which patient characteristics, exertional leg symptoms, and cardiovascular risk profile accompany the anatomic lesion location may facilitate a more tailor-made management of PAD.
METHODS: This cross-sectional study comprised 701 patients from two vascular surgery outpatient clinics with new-onset symptoms of PAD (Fontaine 2) who underwent duplex ultrasound (DUS) examinations from March 2006 to March 2011. The main outcome measures were patient characteristics, self-reported leg symptoms, and cardiovascular risk factors as documented from questionnaires and medical records. Peripheral lesion information, categorized by proximal and distal lesions, was obtained from DUS examinations. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed of proximal vs nonproximal lesions, distal vs nondistal lesions, and proximal and distal vs absence of having both lesions to assess relationships between patient characteristics, leg symptom categories (typical vs atypical leg symptoms), cardiovascular risk factors, and anatomic lesion location.
RESULTS: Lesions were proximal in 270 (38.5%), distal in 441 (62.9%), and proximal and distal in 94 (13.4%). Patients with proximal lesions were younger (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; P < .0001) and less likely to be obese (OR, 0.34; P < .0001) than those without proximal lesions. Older age (OR, 1.07; P < .0001), male sex (OR, 1.96; P = .003), being without a partner (OR, 2.24; P = .004), and lower anxiety scores (OR, 0.42; P = .003) were associated with distal lesions. Patients with both lesions were more likely to be single (OR, 2.30; P = .010) and less likely to be obese (OR, 0.24; P = .009). No distinguishing leg symptom pattern was observed for patients with proximal lesions. Intermittent claudication was more frequently reported in those with distal lesions (P = .011). Although buttock and thigh pain seemed to be somewhat more present in proximal lesions (P < .01) and calf pain more in distal lesions (P < .001), patients still reported pain at a variety of levels throughout their legs, regardless of the anatomic lesion location.
CONCLUSIONS: Two distinctive PAD phenotypes-each with its own characteristics and risk factors-emerged by anatomic lesion location; however, PAD-specific leg symptoms did not always reflect the anatomic lesion location. These findings may open new opportunities to better tailor PAD management to these two PAD subgroups and may raise awareness about not relying on self-reported symptoms to guide further diagnostic imaging and peripheral lesion management.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22244858     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  6 in total

1.  Comparison of leg loader and treadmill exercise for evaluating patients with peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Yasushi Ueki; Takashi Miura; Tomoaki Mochidome; Keisuke Senda; Soichiro Ebisawa; Tatsuya Saigusa; Hirohiko Motoki; Ayako Okada; Jun Koyama; Koichiro Kuwahara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 2.  Methods of symptom evaluation and their impact on peripheral artery disease (PAD) symptom prevalence: a review.

Authors:  Erica N Schorr; Diane Treat-Jacobson
Journal:  Vasc Med       Date:  2013-03-18       Impact factor: 3.239

3.  Gender differences in health status and adverse outcomes among patients with peripheral arterial disease.

Authors:  Rachel P Dreyer; Moniek van Zitteren; John F Beltrame; Robert Fitridge; Johan Denollet; Patrick W Vriens; John A Spertus; Kim G Smolderen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 5.501

4.  Health Effects of the Programmed Physical Activities on Lipid Profile in Peripheral Arterial Disease of the Lower Extremities.

Authors:  Abel Baltic; Rusmir Baljic; Izet Radjo; Akif Mlaco
Journal:  Med Arch       Date:  2015-10-04

5.  Protocol for a prospective, longitudinal cohort study on the effect of arterial disease level on the outcomes of supervised exercise in intermittent claudication: the ELECT Registry.

Authors:  Marijn Ml van den Houten; Sandra Cp Jansen; Anneroos Sinnige; Lijckle van der Laan; Patrick Whe Vriens; Edith M Willigendael; Jan-Willem Hp Lardenoije; Jan-Willem M Elshof; Eline S van Hattum; Maarten A Lijkwan; Ivan Nyklíček; Ellen V Rouwet; Mark Jw Koelemay; Marc Rm Scheltinga; Joep Aw Teijink
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Long-Term Prognostic Risk in Lower Extremity Peripheral Arterial Disease as a Function of the Number of Peripheral Arterial Lesions.

Authors:  Kim G Smolderen; Moniek van Zitteren; Philip G Jones; John A Spertus; Jan M Heyligers; Maria J Nooren; Patrick W Vriens; Johan Denollet
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 5.501

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.