Literature DB >> 22244801

Phase II study of biweekly cetuximab in combination with irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with platinum-resistant gastro-oesophageal cancer.

K R Schønnemann1, M Yilmaz, J K Bjerregaard, K M Nielsen, P Pfeiffer.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cetuximab and irinotecan as second-line treatment in patients with gastro-oesophageal adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with failure to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy received cetuximab 500 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 180 mg/m(2) every second week until disease progression. Toxicity was evaluated according to The Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) v. 3.0. Antitumour activity was assessed according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v. 1.0.
RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were enrolled, median age was 60 years, median performance status was 1 (0-1), 35 patients had two or more organs involved. The median number of courses was 5 (range 1-25). Response rate was 11% (6 partial response (PR)) and 37% had stable disease. Median progression free survival was 2.8 months and overall survival (OS) was 6.1 months. Grade 3-4 toxicity included: diarrhoea (6%), fatigue (5%), vomiting (5%) and neutropenia (16%). Two patients developed febrile neutropenia. Forty-six patients (73%) had developed grade 1-2 skin rash. Patients developing skin rash had a prolonged survival with an OS at 7.1 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of cetuximab and irinotecan is active as second-line therapy in patients with gastro-oesophageal cancer. Cetuximab induced skin rash was associated with prolonged survival. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22244801     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  4 in total

Review 1.  Individualized treatment of gastric cancer: Impact of molecular biology and pathohistological features.

Authors:  Yves Dittmar; Utz Settmacher
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 2.  Second-line treatment of metastatic gastric cancer: Current options and future directions.

Authors:  Dheepak Kanagavel; Mikhail Fedyanin; Alexey Tryakin; Sergei Tjulandin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Targeting EGFR in Esophagogastric Cancer.

Authors:  Steven B Maron; James Xu; Yelena Y Janjigian
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  PET Imaging Biomarkers of Anti-EGFR Immunotherapy in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Models.

Authors:  Tae Sup Lee; In Ho Song; Jong Il Shin; Yong Serk Park; Jung Young Kim; Kwang Il Kim; Yong Jin Lee; Joo Hyun Kang
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2018-10-27       Impact factor: 6.600

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.