INTRODUCTION: The vapor lock effect has been shown to limit the penetration of irrigating solutions into the apical third of root canals both in vivo and in vitro; however, little attention has been given to gas bubbles in the remainder of the root canal system. METHODS:Seventy-one human root canals were randomly divided into 4 groups. Apical patency was maintained in 2 groups in both small (PS) (n = 21) and big canals (PB) (n = 15) during shaping and cleaning procedures with a 10 K-file 1 mm beyond working length but not in the other 2 groups: no patency, small canals (NPS) (n = 19) and no patency, big canals (NPB) (n = 16). Irrigation was performed with 1 mL of a solution prepared with a radiopaque contrast medium and sodium hypochlorite 5.25%. Digital images were taken, and a calibrated reader determined the presence or absence of gas bubbles in the middle and cervical thirds of the root canal system. RESULTS: When a patency file was not used, 40% of the root canals presented gas bubbles; when a patency file was used, 25% of the cases exhibited gas bubbles. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of gas bubbles in the middle and cervical thirds of the root canal system during cleaning and shaping procedures is a common finding regardless of whether a patency file was used, although maintaining apical patency significantly leads to minimizing the presence of gas bubbles in big canals (P < .05).
RCT Entities:
INTRODUCTION: The vapor lock effect has been shown to limit the penetration of irrigating solutions into the apical third of root canals both in vivo and in vitro; however, little attention has been given to gas bubbles in the remainder of the root canal system. METHODS: Seventy-one human root canals were randomly divided into 4 groups. Apical patency was maintained in 2 groups in both small (PS) (n = 21) and big canals (PB) (n = 15) during shaping and cleaning procedures with a 10 K-file 1 mm beyond working length but not in the other 2 groups: no patency, small canals (NPS) (n = 19) and no patency, big canals (NPB) (n = 16). Irrigation was performed with 1 mL of a solution prepared with a radiopaque contrast medium and sodium hypochlorite 5.25%. Digital images were taken, and a calibrated reader determined the presence or absence of gas bubbles in the middle and cervical thirds of the root canal system. RESULTS: When a patency file was not used, 40% of the root canals presented gas bubbles; when a patency file was used, 25% of the cases exhibited gas bubbles. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of gas bubbles in the middle and cervical thirds of the root canal system during cleaning and shaping procedures is a common finding regardless of whether a patency file was used, although maintaining apical patency significantly leads to minimizing the presence of gas bubbles in big canals (P < .05).