Literature DB >> 22244610

Using artificial intelligence to predict the risk for posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification.

Seyed-Farzad Mohammadi1, Mostafa Sabbaghi, Hadi Z-Mehrjardi, Hassan Hashemi, Somayeh Alizadeh, Mercede Majdi, Farough Taee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To apply artificial intelligence models to predict the occurrence of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) after phacoemulsification.
SETTING: Farabi Eye Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
DESIGN: Clinical-based cross-sectional study.
METHODS: The posterior capsule status of eyes operated on for age-related cataract and the need for laser capsulotomy were determined. After a literature review, data polishing, and expert consultation, 10 input variables were selected. The QUEST algorithm was used to develop a decision tree. Three back-propagation artificial neural networks were constructed with 4, 20, and 40 neurons in 2 hidden layers and trained with the same transfer functions (log-sigmoid and linear transfer) and training protocol with randomly selected eyes. They were then tested on the remaining eyes and the networks compared for their performance. Performance indices were used to compare resultant models with the results of logistic regression analysis.
RESULTS: The models were trained using 282 randomly selected eyes and then tested using 70 eyes. Laser capsulotomy for clinically significant PCO was indicated or had been performed 2 years postoperatively in 40 eyes. A sample decision tree was produced with accuracy of 50% (likelihood ratio 0.8). The best artificial neural network, which showed 87% accuracy and a positive likelihood ratio of 8, was achieved with 40 neurons. The area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve was 0.71. In comparison, logistic regression reached accuracy of 80%; however, the likelihood ratio was not measurable because the sensitivity was zero.
CONCLUSION: A prototype artificial neural network was developed that predicted posterior capsule status (requiring capsulotomy) with reasonable accuracy. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.
Copyright © 2012 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22244610     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2011.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

Review 1.  Application of artificial intelligence in cataract management: current and future directions.

Authors:  Laura Gutierrez; Jane Sujuan Lim; Li Lian Foo; Wei Yan Ng; Michelle Yip; Gilbert Yong San Lim; Melissa Hsing Yi Wong; Allan Fong; Mohamad Rosman; Jodhbir Singth Mehta; Haotian Lin; Darren Shu Jeng Ting; Daniel Shu Wei Ting
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2022-01-07

2.  Evolution and Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Cataract Surgery.

Authors:  Daniel Josef Lindegger; James Wawrzynski; George Michael Saleh
Journal:  Ophthalmol Sci       Date:  2022-04-25

3.  Outcomes of Cataract Surgery at a Referral Center.

Authors:  Seyed-Farzad Mohammadi; Hassan Hashemi; Arash Mazouri; Nazanin Rahman-A; Elham Ashrafi; Hadi Z Mehrjardi; Ramak Roohipour; Akbar Fotouhi
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 4.  Application of artificial intelligence in anterior segment ophthalmic diseases: diversity and standardization.

Authors:  Xiaohang Wu; Lixue Liu; Lanqin Zhao; Chong Guo; Ruiyang Li; Ting Wang; Xiaonan Yang; Peichen Xie; Yizhi Liu; Haotian Lin
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.