| Literature DB >> 22243837 |
Golandam Sharifi1, Hassan Ebrahimzadeh, Behzad Ghareyazie, Javad Gharechahi, Elaheh Vatankhah.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Somatic embryogenesis (SE) is a complex biological process that occurs under inductive conditions and causes fully differentiated cells to be reprogrammed to an embryo like state. In order to get a better insight about molecular basis of the SE in Crocus sativus L. and to characterize differentially accumulated proteins during the process, a proteomic study based on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time of flight mass spectrometry has been carried out.Entities:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22243837 PMCID: PMC3349542 DOI: 10.1186/1477-5956-10-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proteome Sci ISSN: 1477-5956 Impact factor: 2.480
Figure 1Somatic embryogenesis in saffron. Rectangular sections of the meristematic tissue of corm collected in August were used as the initial explants. SE was induced in MS medium containing auxin (2,4-D) and cytokinin (Kin). Corm explants produced both embryogenic (Nodular callus, NC) and non-embryogenic (NEC) calli. NC were nodular and translucent in color, while NEC were amorphous and spongy. The characteristic feature of the globular embryos was that they easily dissociated from mother calli upon touch. White arrow shows the location of a globular stage embryo.
Figure 2Comparison of 2-DE gel images derived from corm explants along with its embryogenic (NC) and non-embryogenic (NEC) calli after SE induction in culture. The black circles show the location of the highly abundant protein spots that completely vanished or decreased in abundance during somatic to embryonic transition.
Figure 3Graph shows the frequency distribution of the relative abundance ratios (induction factors) for all matched spots between NC and NEC gels. The highlighted regions show the statistically significant spots that showed more than 1.5 fold change (increase or decrease) in abundance in NC compared with NEC.
Differentially modulated proteins (≥ 1.5-fold change in abundance) in embryogenic (NC) and non-embryogenic (NEC) calli compared with corm explants in Crocus sativus.
| Spot | The/Expb | Protein name/Organism | Accession Noc | % Cov./Scor.d | PMF/MS-MSe | Abundance ratiof | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 467 | 75/80 | 5/4.89 | Heat shock protein 70/ | Q39641 | 81/556 | 9/5 | 1.9** | 1.6* | 1.1 |
| 473 | 75/79 | 5/4.85 | Heat shock protein 70/ | Q39641 | 12/402 | 6/5 | 1.6* | 1.6* | 1.0 |
| 535 | 61/73 | 5.7/6.27 | Heat shock protein 70 (HSP70)-interacting protein, putative/ | B9RBP6 | 8/98 | 4/1 | 5.6** | 3.6* | 1.5* |
| 542 | 62/73 | 5/5.76 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein, mitochondrial/ | Q08276 | 18/88 | 10/1 | 5.8** | 3.6** | 1.6** |
| 560 | 72/70 | 5.5/5.59 | Heat shock 70 kDa protein/ | B6U4A3 | 19/375 | 12/4 | 6.3** | 5.1** | 1.2 |
| 680 | 59/61 | 5.4/5.61 | T-complex protein 1 epsilon subunit, putative/TCP-1-epsilon/ | O04450 | 8/101 | 4/3 | 5.4** | 7.4** | -1.4 |
| 686 | 63/62 | 5.5/5.20 | Chaperonin/ | Q9LJE4 | 17/226 | 7/3 | -1.5 | -1.6* | 1.1 |
| 727 | 57/61 | 5.5/6.24 | Chaperonin/ | Q940P8 | 20/272 | 7/4 | 6.9** | 5.3* | 1.3 |
| 641 | 60/64 | 5.97/6.27 | Chaperonin containing t-complex/ | B9SUJ3 | 18/137 | 9/3 | 6.1** | 5.1* | 1.2 |
| 676 | 62/63 | 6.6/5.03 | Rubisco large subunit-binding protein/ | P21241 | 10/96 | 4/2 | ˃ | ˃ | 1.3 |
| 1188 | 47/50 | 6.9/5.55 | Glutamine synthetase precursor/ | Q95AG1 | 16/378 | 7/4 | 5.6** | 4.6** | 1.2 |
| 1297 | 39/47 | 5.3/5.73 | Glutamine synthetase/ | O24334 | 17/310 | 5/3 | 4.4** | 3.8** | 1.2 |
| 1729 | 20/34 | 9.7/5.37 | Glutathione S-transferase/ | A7KP03 | 6/79 | 1/1 | ˃ | ˃ | -1.4* |
| 1656 | 20/36 | 9.7/5.01 | Glutathione S-transferase/ | A7KP03 | 6/86 | 1/1 | ˃ | ˃ | -1.2 |
| 1950 | 26/29 | 6.2/6.04 | Glutathione S-transferase U20/ | Q8L7C9 | 11/80 | 3/2 | ˃ | ˃ | -1.3 |
| 1036 | 47/54 | 4.8/5.15 | 26S protease regulatory subunit 6A homolog/ | P54776 | 27/541 | 15/7 | 4.0** | 3.8* | 1.0 |
| 1042 | 47/54 | 4.8/5.08 | 26S protease regulatory subunit 6A homolog/ | P54776 | 29/516 | 16/9 | 5.9** | 4.3** | 1.4 |
| 1136 | 42/51 | 6/6.05 | dTDP-glucose 4-6-dehydratase/ | B9SZ78 | 35/381 | 15/4 | 3.0* | 4.2** | -1.4 |
| 1147 | 42/51 | 5.8/6.18 | GDP-D-mannose-3',5'-epimerase/ | A0EJL8 | 15/108 | 6/3 | ˃ | ˃ | 1.4* |
| 275 | 99/99 | 5.8/6.03 | Aconitase/ | B9SXB6 | 7/85 | 6/2 | 9.1** | 8.6** | 1.0 |
| 1756 | 34/33 | 9.7/5.12 | 6-phosphogluconolactonase, putative/ | B9RWU6 | 12/86 | 2/1 | -9.1** | -7.7** | 1.2 |
| 1443 | 35/43 | 4.9/4.91 | Probable fructokinase-2/ | Q9LNE3 | 22/182 | 7/3 | ˃ | ˃ | 1.2 |
| 1199 | 51/50 | 5.8/5.61 | Elongation factor Tu, chloroplastic/ | P17745 | 16/360 | 5/5 | 1.8** | 1.4ns | 1.3 |
| 1868 | 92/31 | 5.8/5.14 | Initiation factor eIF-4 gamma, middle; Up-frameshift suppressor2/ | Q2HSQ9 | 63/72 | 5/0 | ˃ | ˃ | -1.4* |
| 1644 | 32/37 | 5.69/6.56 | Isoflavone reductase-like1/ | P52580 | 7/85 | 2/1 | ˃ | ˃ | -1.1 |
| 1596 | 33/39 | 5.76/6.04 | Isoflavone reductase-like protein 5/ | Q3KN68 | 15/123 | 3/1 | ˃ | ˃ | -1.1 |
| 1622 | 34/38 | 6/6.02 | Isoflavone reductase related protein/ | O81355 | 11/147 | 2/2 | ˃ | ˃ | 1.2 |
| 896 | 45/57 | 5.9/5.14 | RNA binding protein 45/ | Q9LEB4 | 3/88 | 1/1 | 4.7* | 5.2* | -1.1 |
| 297 | 90/97 | 5.28/5.13 | Cell division control protein 48 homolog A/ | P54609 | 22/238 | 12/5 | 4.2* | 3.7** | 1.1 |
| 1816 | 22/33 | 5.9/6.72 | Cysteine proteinase inhibitor 6/ | Q8H0X6 | 25/155 | 5/2 | 2.9* | 3.7** | 1.2 |
| 584 | 84/70 | 9.4/5.1 | Putative uncharacterized protein/ | B9FCS8 | 6/121 | 4/3 | ˃ | ˃ | 1.4 |
| 621 | 61/67 | 5.29/5.7 | Phosphoglyceromutase/ | Q42908 | 13/191 | 5/2 | ˃ | ˃ | 1.2 |
| 1750 | 27/34 | 5.2/5.5 | Caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase/ | Q8H9B6 | 45/488 | 10/4 | ˃ | ˃ | -2.7** |
| 1752 | 42/35 | 9.3/6.1 | Ascorbate peroxidase/ | Q8LSK6 | 20/268 | 6/3 | ˃ | ˃ | 1.1 |
| 2150 | 8.8/19 | 4.8/4.8 | Copper chaperone/ | B6T1K0 | 32/211 | 3/3 | ˃ | ˃ | -1.4 |
| 2192 | 36/18 | 6.3/6.2 | Cys/Met metabolism PLP-dependent enzyme family protein/ | Q10KP3 | 13/76 | 6/0 | ˃ | ˃ | -2* |
a) The numbering corresponds to the match IDs in 2D gels.
b) Theoretical/Experimental MW (kDa) and pI.
c) Accession number in Uni-Prot.
d) Percent of sequence coverage and Mascot score resulted from combined MS-MS/MS search.
e) Number of peptide identified by PMF and MS/MS.
f) Fold change in abundance levels, * (p ≤ 0.05), ** (p ≤ 0.01)
Figure 42-DE map of proteins extracted from NEC after SE induction . Total soluble proteins were extracted by phenol extraction method; 160-μg protein was loaded into 18 cm IPG strips with linear pH gradient of 4-7 for isoelectric focusing (IEF). Second dimension was run in 11.5% SDS-PAGE gels. Proteins were visualized by silver staining. Arrows show the positions of the identified proteins by MS, which showed statistically significant change in abundance. The numbering corresponds to the match IDs as shown in table 1.
Figure 5Functional classification of the differently accumulated proteins during SE induction in . The pie chart shows the distribution of the proteins which appeared to be increased or decreased during SE into different functional classes in percentage.