WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • Available data from animal studies suggest that the narcotic drug propofol interacts with the endocannabinoid system. Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of anandamide could explain some of the characteristics of propofol. Direct measurements have not been reported yet in humans. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • Propofol does not change the time course of anandamide plasma concentrations during anaesthesia. Furthermore, propofol does not inhibit fatty acid amide hydrolase activity ex vivo or in vitro. Thus, specific characteristics of the narcotic drug propofol cannot be explained by peripheral inhibition of anandamide degradation in humans. AIMS: The aim of our study was to describe the time course of endocannabinoids during different anaesthesia protocols in more detail, and to challenge the hypothesis that propofol acts as a FAAH inhibitor. METHODS: Endocannabinoids were measured during the first hour of anaesthesia in 14 women and 14 men undergoing general anaesthesia with propofol and in 14 women and 14 men receiving thiopental/sevoflurane. We also incubated whole human blood samples ex vivo with propofol and the known FAAH inhibitor oloxa and determined FAAH enzyme kinetics. RESULTS: Plasma anandamide decreased similarly with propofol and thiopental/sevoflurane anaesthesia, and reached a nadir after 10 min. Areas under the curve for anandamide (mean and 95% CI) were 53.3 (47.4, 59.2) nmol l(-1) 60 min with propofol and 48.5 (43.1, 53.8) nmol l(-1) 60 min with thiopental/sevoflurane (P= NS). Anandamide and propofol plasma concentrations were not correlated at any time point. Ex vivo FAAH activity was not inhibited by propofol. Enzyme kinetics (mean ± SD) of recombinant human FAAH were K(m) = 16.9 ± 8.8 µmol l(-1) and V(max) = 44.6 ± 15.8 nmol mg(-1) min(-1) FAAH without, and K(m) = 16.6 ± 4.0 µmol l(-1) and V(max) = 44.0 ± 7.6 nmol mg( 1 ) min(-1) FAAH with 50 µmol l(-1) propofol (P= NS for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings challenge the idea that propofol anaesthesia and also propofol addiction are directly mediated by FAAH inhibition, but we cannot exclude other indirect actions on cannabinoid receptors.
WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT: • Available data from animal studies suggest that the narcotic drug propofol interacts with the endocannabinoid system. Inhibition of enzymatic degradation of anandamide could explain some of the characteristics of propofol. Direct measurements have not been reported yet in humans. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: • Propofol does not change the time course of anandamide plasma concentrations during anaesthesia. Furthermore, propofol does not inhibit fatty acid amide hydrolase activity ex vivo or in vitro. Thus, specific characteristics of the narcotic drug propofol cannot be explained by peripheral inhibition of anandamide degradation in humans. AIMS: The aim of our study was to describe the time course of endocannabinoids during different anaesthesia protocols in more detail, and to challenge the hypothesis that propofol acts as a FAAH inhibitor. METHODS:Endocannabinoids were measured during the first hour of anaesthesia in 14 women and 14 men undergoing general anaesthesia with propofol and in 14 women and 14 men receiving thiopental/sevoflurane. We also incubated whole human blood samples ex vivo with propofol and the known FAAH inhibitor oloxa and determined FAAH enzyme kinetics. RESULTS: Plasma anandamide decreased similarly with propofol and thiopental/sevoflurane anaesthesia, and reached a nadir after 10 min. Areas under the curve for anandamide (mean and 95% CI) were 53.3 (47.4, 59.2) nmol l(-1) 60 min with propofol and 48.5 (43.1, 53.8) nmol l(-1) 60 min with thiopental/sevoflurane (P= NS). Anandamide and propofol plasma concentrations were not correlated at any time point. Ex vivo FAAH activity was not inhibited by propofol. Enzyme kinetics (mean ± SD) of recombinant humanFAAH were K(m) = 16.9 ± 8.8 µmol l(-1) and V(max) = 44.6 ± 15.8 nmol mg(-1) min(-1) FAAH without, and K(m) = 16.6 ± 4.0 µmol l(-1) and V(max) = 44.0 ± 7.6 nmol mg( 1 ) min(-1) FAAH with 50 µmol l(-1) propofol (P= NS for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings challenge the idea that propofol anaesthesia and also propofol addiction are directly mediated by FAAH inhibition, but we cannot exclude other indirect actions on cannabinoid receptors.
Authors: Linda K Vaughn; Gerene Denning; Kara L Stuhr; Harriet de Wit; Matthew N Hill; Cecilia J Hillard Journal: Br J Pharmacol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 8.739
Authors: F Weis; A Beiras-Fernandez; D Hauer; C Hornuss; R Sodian; S Kreth; J Briegel; G Schelling Journal: Br J Anaesth Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 9.166
Authors: Yuri A Blednov; Benjamin F Cravatt; Stephen L Boehm; Danielle Walker; R Adron Harris Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-12-13 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Alexander A Zoerner; Frank M Gutzki; Maria T Suchy; Bibiana Beckmann; Stefan Engeli; Jens Jordan; Dimitrios Tsikas Journal: J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci Date: 2009-04-14 Impact factor: 3.205