Literature DB >> 22242671

Use of (11)C-methionine PET parametric response map for monitoring WT1 immunotherapy response in recurrent malignant glioma.

Yasuyoshi Chiba1, Manabu Kinoshita, Yoshiko Okita, Akihiro Tsuboi, Kayako Isohashi, Naoki Kagawa, Yasunori Fujimoto, Yusuke Oji, Yoshihiro Oka, Eku Shimosegawa, Satoshi Morita, Jun Hatazawa, Haruo Sugiyama, Naoya Hashimoto, Toshiki Yoshimine.   

Abstract

OBJECT: Immunotherapy targeting the Wilms tumor 1 (WT1) gene product is a promising treatment modality for patients with malignant gliomas, and there have been reports of encouraging results. It has become clear, however, that Gd-enhanced MR imaging does not reflect prognosis, thereby necessitating a more robust imaging evaluation system for monitoring response to WT1 immunotherapy. To meet this demand, the authors performed a voxel-wise parametric response map (PRM) analysis of (11)C-methionine PET (MET-PET) in WT1 immunotherapy and compared the data with the overall survival after initiation of WT1 immunotherapy (OS(WT1)).
METHODS: Fourteen patients with recurrent malignant glioma were included in the study, and OS(WT1) was compared with: 1) volume and length change in the contrast area of the tumor on Gd-enhanced MR images; 2) change in maximum uptake of (11)C-methionine; and 3) a more detailed voxel-wise PRM analysis of MET-PET pre- and post-WT1 immunotherapy.
RESULTS: The PRM analysis was able to identify the following 3 areas within the tumor core: 1) area with no change in (11)C-methionine uptake pre- and posttreatment; 2) area with increased (11)C-methionine uptake posttreatment (PRM(+MET)); and 3) area with decreased (11)C-methionine uptake posttreatment. While the results of Gd-enhanced MR imaging volumetric and conventional MET-PET analysis did not correlate with OS(WT1) (p = 0.270 for Gd-enhanced MR imaging length, p = 0.960 for Gd-enhanced MR imaging volume, and p = 0.110 for MET-PET), the percentage of PRM(+MET) area showed excellent correlation (p = 0.008) with OS(WT1).
CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the limited value of Gd-enhanced MR imaging and highlights the potential of voxel-wise PRM analysis of MET-PET for monitoring treatment response in immunotherapy for malignant gliomas. Clinical trial registration no.: UMIN000002001.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22242671     DOI: 10.3171/2011.12.JNS111255

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  15 in total

1.  Apparent diffusion coefficient parametric response mapping MRI for follow-up of glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ra Gyoung Yoon; Ho Sung Kim; Dae Yoon Kim; Gil Sun Hong; Sang Joon Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Re-defining response and treatment effects for neuro-oncology immunotherapy clinical trials.

Authors:  David A Reardon; Hideho Okada
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Whole-tumor histogram analysis of the cerebral blood volume map: tumor volume defined by 11C-methionine positron emission tomography image improves the diagnostic accuracy of cerebral glioma grading.

Authors:  Rongli Wu; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Atsuko Arisawa; Hiroto Takahashi; Hisashi Tanaka; Yasunori Fujimoto; Tadashi Watabe; Kayako Isohashi; Jun Hatazawa; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 4.  Pseudoprogression, radionecrosis, inflammation or true tumor progression? challenges associated with glioblastoma response assessment in an evolving therapeutic landscape.

Authors:  Benjamin M Ellingson; Caroline Chung; Whitney B Pope; Jerrold L Boxerman; Timothy J Kaufmann
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 5.  Clinical correlates for immune checkpoint therapy: significance for CNS malignancies.

Authors:  Nivedita M Ratnam; Stephen C Frederico; Javier A Gonzalez; Mark R Gilbert
Journal:  Neurooncol Adv       Date:  2020-11-27

6.  Image registration for quantitative parametric response mapping of cancer treatment response.

Authors:  Jennifer L Boes; Benjamin A Hoff; Nola Hylton; Martin D Pickles; Lindsay W Turnbull; Anne F Schott; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Ryan Chamberlain; Benjamin Lemasson; Thomas L Chenevert; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Brian D Ross
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 4.243

Review 7.  How to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy.

Authors:  Yiming Ma; Qiwei Wang; Qian Dong; Lei Zhan; Jingdong Zhang
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 6.166

8.  Integrated multimodal imaging of dynamic bone-tumor alterations associated with metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jean-Christophe Brisset; Benjamin A Hoff; Thomas L Chenevert; Jon A Jacobson; Jennifer L Boes; Stefanie Galbán; Alnawaz Rehemtulla; Timothy D Johnson; Kenneth J Pienta; Craig J Galbán; Charles R Meyer; Timothy Schakel; Klaas Nicolay; Ajjai S Alva; Maha Hussain; Brian D Ross
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Dendritic Cell-Based Immunotherapy Treatment for Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Liu Yang; Geng Guo; Xiao-yuan Niu; Jing Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Making a Cold Tumor Hot: The Role of Vaccines in the Treatment of Glioblastoma.

Authors:  Stephen C Frederico; John C Hancock; Emily E S Brettschneider; Nivedita M Ratnam; Mark R Gilbert; Masaki Terabe
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.