Bengt Glimelius1, Nina Cavalli-Björkman. 1. Department of Radiology, Oncology and Radiation Science, University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden. bengt.glimelius@onkologi.uu.se
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures. The development seen using medical treatments are reviewed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic approach to the literature-based evidence of effects from palliative chemotherapy and targeted drugs was aimed at. RESULTS: The continuous improvements during the past 20-25 years have been documented in several large conclusive trials. At the end of the 1980s, the evidence that chemotherapy should be used at all was very limited, whereas presently most patients can be offered three lines of chemotherapy with or without a targeted drug based upon good scientific evidence. Median survival in trials has gradually improved from about 6 months to above 24 months in the most recent trials. Survival in the populations has, however, not improved to the same extent. Several important issues remain to be solved, such as the best sequence of treatments, what regimens to use in various situations, when to start and when to stop if a response is seen, whether cure may be possible in a small subset of patients, and socioeconomic issues. Integration of surgery and other local methods have further improved outcome for some individuals, but must be fine-tuned. CONCLUSIONS: Progress has been rapid in advanced colorectal cancer. This is likely a result of well-designed trials in collaboration between academy and industry, showing a great interest in the disease. A multi-professional approach and future collaborations may hopefully introduce new treatment concepts, further improving outcome.
BACKGROUND:Metastatic colorectal cancer has a poor prognosis, and the majority of patients are left with palliative measures. The development seen using medical treatments are reviewed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A systematic approach to the literature-based evidence of effects from palliative chemotherapy and targeted drugs was aimed at. RESULTS: The continuous improvements during the past 20-25 years have been documented in several large conclusive trials. At the end of the 1980s, the evidence that chemotherapy should be used at all was very limited, whereas presently most patients can be offered three lines of chemotherapy with or without a targeted drug based upon good scientific evidence. Median survival in trials has gradually improved from about 6 months to above 24 months in the most recent trials. Survival in the populations has, however, not improved to the same extent. Several important issues remain to be solved, such as the best sequence of treatments, what regimens to use in various situations, when to start and when to stop if a response is seen, whether cure may be possible in a small subset of patients, and socioeconomic issues. Integration of surgery and other local methods have further improved outcome for some individuals, but must be fine-tuned. CONCLUSIONS: Progress has been rapid in advanced colorectal cancer. This is likely a result of well-designed trials in collaboration between academy and industry, showing a great interest in the disease. A multi-professional approach and future collaborations may hopefully introduce new treatment concepts, further improving outcome.
Authors: Chul Seung Lee; Sung-Hoon Yoon; Seung-Min Lee; In Kyu Lee; Jang Young Kim; Hyun Min Cho; Min Ki Kim Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-04 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Alexander Massmann; Thomas Rodt; Steffen Marquardt; Roland Seidel; Katrina Thomas; Frank Wacker; Götz M Richter; Hans U Kauczor; Arno Bücker; Philippe L Pereira; Christof M Sommer Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: O Majek; A Gondos; L Jansen; K Emrich; B Holleczek; A Katalinic; A Nennecke; A Eberle; H Brenner Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Per J Nilsson; Boudewijn van Etten; Geke A P Hospers; Lars Påhlman; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Regina G H Beets-Tan; Lennart Blomqvist; Jannet C Beukema; Ellen Kapiteijn; Corrie A M Marijnen; Iris D Nagtegaal; Theo Wiggers; Bengt Glimelius Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-06-07 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Bin Jiang; Jeffrey Mason; Anahid Jewett; Jun Qian; Yijiang Ding; William C S Cho; Xichen Zhang; Yan-gao Man Journal: Int J Biol Sci Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 6.580
Authors: N Cavalli-Björkman; C Qvortrup; S Sebjørnsen; P Pfeiffer; T Wentzel-Larsen; B Glimelius; H Sorbye Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-05-10 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Niels Frank Jensen; Keli Agama; Amit Roy; David Hersi Smith; Thomas D Pfister; Maria Unni Rømer; Hong-Liang Zhang; James H Doroshow; Birgitta R Knudsen; Jan Stenvang; Nils Brünner; Yves Pommier Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res Date: 2016-03-31