Literature DB >> 22241866

Epistemic humility and medical practice: translating epistemic categories into ethical obligations.

Abraham Schwab1.   

Abstract

Physicians and other medical practitioners make untold numbers of judgments about patient care on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. These judgments fall along a number of spectrums, from the mundane to the tragic, from the obvious to the challenging. Under the rubric of evidence-based medicine, these judgments will be informed by the robust conclusions of medical research. In the ideal circumstance, medical research makes the best decision obvious to the trained professional. Even when practice approximates this ideal, it does so unevenly. Judgments in medical practice are always accompanied by uncertainty, and this uncertainty is a fickle companion--constant in its presence but inconstant in its expression. This feature of medical judgments gives rise to the moral responsibility of medical practitioners to be epistemically humble. This requires the recognition and communication of the uncertainty that accompanies their judgment as well as a commitment to avoiding intuitive innovations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22241866     DOI: 10.1093/jmp/jhr054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  2 in total

1.  You Present like a Drug Addict: Patient and Clinician Perspectives on Trust and Trustworthiness in Chronic Pain Management.

Authors:  Daniel Z Buchman; Anita Ho; Judy Illes
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.750

2.  Perspectives About Time Frames in Stem Cell Research for Multiple Sclerosis: "Time Is Brain".

Authors:  Shelly Benjaminy; Cody Lo; Andrew Schepmyer; Anthony Traboulsee; Judy Illes
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2019 Jul-Aug
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.