Literature DB >> 22241100

Molecular genetic testing for fragile X syndrome: laboratory performance on the College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys (2001-2009).

Karen E Weck1, Barbara Zehnbauer, Michael Datto, Iris Schrijver.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The College of American Pathologists offers biannual proficiency testing for molecular analysis of fragile X syndrome. The purpose of this study was to analyze laboratory performance on the fragile X proficiency surveys from 2001 to 2009.
METHODS: Individual laboratory responses were analyzed for accuracy of genotype determination (normal, gray zone, premutation, or full mutation) and size analysis of the FMR1 trinucleotide repeat region. The analytical sensitivity and specificity of testing for fragile X were calculated, and laboratory performance for trinucleotide repeat sizing was evaluated.
RESULTS: Overall, laboratories demonstrated analytical sensitivity of 99% and 96% for detection of full mutations associated with fragile X syndrome in males and females, respectively; analytical sensitivity of 98% for detection of premutations; and analytical specificity of 99.9%. Size measurements of the CGG repeat region were acceptable from most laboratories, with an increase in the range of reported sizes observed for larger repeat expansions.
CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic testing for fragile X syndrome demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity by laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys. Allele sizing demonstrated good performance overall with improved accuracy over the study period. Participation in proficiency testing can aid laboratories in assessing individual performance and need for calibration of assays.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22241100     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2011.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  11 in total

1.  Some economics on personalized and predictive medicine.

Authors:  F Antoñanzas; C A Juárez-Castelló; R Rodríguez-Ibeas
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2014-11-08

Review 2.  Current landscape and new paradigms of proficiency testing and external quality assessment for molecular genetics.

Authors:  Lisa V Kalman; Ira M Lubin; Shannon Barker; Desiree du Sart; Rob Elles; Wayne W Grody; Mario Pazzagli; Sue Richards; Iris Schrijver; Barbara Zehnbauer
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 5.534

3.  Low normal FMR1 genotype in older adult women: Psychological well-being and motor function.

Authors:  Jessica Klusek; Roger Newman-Norlund; Amanda J Fairchild; Sarah Newman-Norlund; Sara Sayers; Jill C Stewart; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  Arch Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 4.163

4.  A novel methylation PCR that offers standardized determination of FMR1 methylation and CGG repeat length without southern blot analysis.

Authors:  Marina Grasso; Elles M J Boon; Stela Filipovic-Sadic; Patrick A van Bunderen; Elena Gennaro; Ru Cao; Gary J Latham; Andrew G Hadd; Domenico A Coviello
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 5.568

5.  CAP/ACMG proficiency testing for biochemical genetics laboratories: a summary of performance.

Authors:  Devin Oglesbee; Tina M Cowan; Marzia Pasquali; Timothy C Wood; Karen E Weck; Thomas Long; Glenn E Palomaki
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Laboratory testing for fragile X, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Elaine Spector; Andrea Behlmann; Kathryn Kronquist; Nancy C Rose; Elaine Lyon; Honey V Reddi
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 8.822

7.  The Case for Laboratory Developed Procedures: Quality and Positive Impact on Patient Care.

Authors:  Karen L Kaul; Linda M Sabatini; Gregory J Tsongalis; Angela M Caliendo; Randall J Olsen; Edward R Ashwood; Sherri Bale; Robert Benirschke; Dean Carlow; Birgit H Funke; Wayne W Grody; Randall T Hayden; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Kazunori Murata; Melissa Pessin; Richard D Press; Richard B Thomson
Journal:  Acad Pathol       Date:  2017-07-16

8.  GenomeTrakr proficiency testing for foodborne pathogen surveillance: an exercise from 2015.

Authors:  Ruth E Timme; Hugh Rand; Maria Sanchez Leon; Maria Hoffmann; Errol Strain; Marc Allard; Dwayne Roberson; Joseph D Baugher
Journal:  Microb Genom       Date:  2018-06-15

9.  Molecular testing for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 Ashkenazi Jewish founder mutations: a report on the College of American Pathologists proficiency testing surveys.

Authors:  Laura J Tafe; Michael B Datto; Glenn E Palomaki; Felicitas L Lacbawan
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  The Italian National External quality assessment program in molecular genetic testing: results of the VII round (2010-2011).

Authors:  F Censi; F Tosto; G Floridia; M Marra; M Salvatore; A M Baffico; M Grasso; M A Melis; E Pelo; P Radice; A Ravani; C Rosatelli; N Resta; S Russo; M Seia; L Varesco; V Falbo; D Taruscio
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.