PURPOSE: The College of American Pathologists offers biannual proficiency testing for molecular analysis of fragile X syndrome. The purpose of this study was to analyze laboratory performance on the fragile X proficiency surveys from 2001 to 2009. METHODS: Individual laboratory responses were analyzed for accuracy of genotype determination (normal, gray zone, premutation, or full mutation) and size analysis of the FMR1 trinucleotide repeat region. The analytical sensitivity and specificity of testing for fragile X were calculated, and laboratory performance for trinucleotide repeat sizing was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, laboratories demonstrated analytical sensitivity of 99% and 96% for detection of full mutations associated with fragile X syndrome in males and females, respectively; analytical sensitivity of 98% for detection of premutations; and analytical specificity of 99.9%. Size measurements of the CGG repeat region were acceptable from most laboratories, with an increase in the range of reported sizes observed for larger repeat expansions. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic testing for fragile X syndrome demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity by laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys. Allele sizing demonstrated good performance overall with improved accuracy over the study period. Participation in proficiency testing can aid laboratories in assessing individual performance and need for calibration of assays.
PURPOSE: The College of American Pathologists offers biannual proficiency testing for molecular analysis of fragile X syndrome. The purpose of this study was to analyze laboratory performance on the fragile X proficiency surveys from 2001 to 2009. METHODS: Individual laboratory responses were analyzed for accuracy of genotype determination (normal, gray zone, premutation, or full mutation) and size analysis of the FMR1 trinucleotide repeat region. The analytical sensitivity and specificity of testing for fragile X were calculated, and laboratory performance for trinucleotide repeat sizing was evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, laboratories demonstrated analytical sensitivity of 99% and 96% for detection of full mutations associated with fragile X syndrome in males and females, respectively; analytical sensitivity of 98% for detection of premutations; and analytical specificity of 99.9%. Size measurements of the CGG repeat region were acceptable from most laboratories, with an increase in the range of reported sizes observed for larger repeat expansions. CONCLUSIONS: Molecular genetic testing for fragile X syndrome demonstrated excellent sensitivity and specificity by laboratories participating in the College of American Pathologists (CAP) surveys. Allele sizing demonstrated good performance overall with improved accuracy over the study period. Participation in proficiency testing can aid laboratories in assessing individual performance and need for calibration of assays.
Authors: Lisa V Kalman; Ira M Lubin; Shannon Barker; Desiree du Sart; Rob Elles; Wayne W Grody; Mario Pazzagli; Sue Richards; Iris Schrijver; Barbara Zehnbauer Journal: Arch Pathol Lab Med Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 5.534
Authors: Jessica Klusek; Roger Newman-Norlund; Amanda J Fairchild; Sarah Newman-Norlund; Sara Sayers; Jill C Stewart; Elizabeth Berry-Kravis; Julius Fridriksson Journal: Arch Gerontol Geriatr Date: 2022-08-12 Impact factor: 4.163
Authors: Marina Grasso; Elles M J Boon; Stela Filipovic-Sadic; Patrick A van Bunderen; Elena Gennaro; Ru Cao; Gary J Latham; Andrew G Hadd; Domenico A Coviello Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2013-10-29 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Devin Oglesbee; Tina M Cowan; Marzia Pasquali; Timothy C Wood; Karen E Weck; Thomas Long; Glenn E Palomaki Journal: Genet Med Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 8.822
Authors: Karen L Kaul; Linda M Sabatini; Gregory J Tsongalis; Angela M Caliendo; Randall J Olsen; Edward R Ashwood; Sherri Bale; Robert Benirschke; Dean Carlow; Birgit H Funke; Wayne W Grody; Randall T Hayden; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Kazunori Murata; Melissa Pessin; Richard D Press; Richard B Thomson Journal: Acad Pathol Date: 2017-07-16
Authors: Ruth E Timme; Hugh Rand; Maria Sanchez Leon; Maria Hoffmann; Errol Strain; Marc Allard; Dwayne Roberson; Joseph D Baugher Journal: Microb Genom Date: 2018-06-15
Authors: F Censi; F Tosto; G Floridia; M Marra; M Salvatore; A M Baffico; M Grasso; M A Melis; E Pelo; P Radice; A Ravani; C Rosatelli; N Resta; S Russo; M Seia; L Varesco; V Falbo; D Taruscio Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2013-01-29 Impact factor: 3.411