Literature DB >> 22240620

The optimal effect site concentration of remifentanil in combination with intravenous midazolam and topical lidocaine for awake fibreoptic nasotracheal intubation in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery.

J W Song1, Y L Kwak, J W Lee, C H Chang, H S Kim, Y H Shim.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Remifentanil has been suggested as a suitable agent for conscious sedation during fibreoptic intubation. We evaluated the optimal effect site concentration (Ce) of remifentanil target-controlled infusion (TCI) for awake nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation in patients undergoing elective cervical spine surgery.
METHODS: Nineteen ASA I-II patients were enrolled. Patients were premedicated with midazolam (<70 kg 1.5 mg; >70 kg 2.0 mg) intravenously. The EC(50) and EC(95) of remifentanil Ce for smooth intubation were determined using Dixon's up-and-down method and isotonic regression. Smooth intubation was considered to have failed when patients exhibited sustained and repetitive coughing with head lift during the procedure. Intubation time, number of attempts, adverse events, and hemodynamic variables were also recorded. Patients were asked to recall the procedure and grade satisfaction at postoperative 24 h.
RESULTS: The EC(50) of remifentanil Ce for smooth intubation was 2.33±0.38 ng·mL-1 as calculated by Dixon's method. The estimated EC(95) of remifentanil Ce was 3.38 (95% confidence interval 2.90-3.46) ng·mL-1. Median intubation time (min) was longer in failed smooth intubation than in smooth intubation (8.0 vs. 6.1, P=0.048). Eleven patients (58%) recalled the procedure and 16 patients (84%) rated their satisfaction score as good or excellent.
CONCLUSION: The estimated EC(95) of remifentanil Ce for smooth nasotracheal fibreoptic intubation with conscious sedation was 3.38 (95% CI 2.90-3.46) ng·mL-1 when used in combination with midazolam and topical lidocaine. Remifentanil TCI may provide a tolerable experience of awake fibreoptic intubation despite the high incidence of recall.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22240620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minerva Anestesiol        ISSN: 0375-9393            Impact factor:   3.051


  4 in total

1.  Effect of 4% nebulized lignocaine versus 2% nebulized lignocaine for awake fibroscopic nasotracheal intubation in maxillofacial surgeries.

Authors:  Lohith Kumar; Haider Abbas; Nikhil Kothari; Monica Kohli; Satish Dhasmana
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2020-06-18

2.  Efficacy of endotracheal lidocaine administration with continuous infusion of remifentanil for attenuating tube-induced coughing during emergence from total intravenous anesthesia.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Yamasaki; Kayoko Takahashi; Shunsuke Yamamoto; Yoko Yamamoto; Yoshihisa Miyata; Takekazu Terai
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil for sedation during awake intubation using a Shikani optical stylet: a randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial.

Authors:  Ting Xu; Min Li; Cheng Ni; Xiang-Yang Guo
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-08-02       Impact factor: 2.217

4.  Comparative study of intubating conditions and hemodynamic changes during awake fiber-optic intubation using midazolam with fentanyl versus dexmedetomidine in cases of difficult airway.

Authors:  Mayank Sachan; Nikhil Kumar Singh; Bhavya Naithani; Haider Abbas; Mallikarjun Dube; Bhavini Naithani
Journal:  Natl J Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2022-07-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.