Literature DB >> 22240552

The influence of blood lactate sample site on exercise prescription.

Paul Moran1, Jonathan G Prichard, Les Ansley, Glyn Howatson.   

Abstract

The aims of this study were first to determine the level of agreement between the fingertip and earlobe for the measurement of blood lactate, and second, to examine whether these sample sites may be used interchangeably when distinguishing lactate parameters routinely used in the physiological assessment and exercise prescription. Twenty healthy men performed an incremental cycle ergometry step test. Capillary blood samples were taken simultaneously at the end of each increment from the earlobe and the fingertip to determine blood lactate concentration. The power output and the heart rate at different lactate parameters (LT, LT1, 2, and 4 mMol·L(-1)) were calculated from the lactate values. The average bias in blood lactate concentration measured from the fingertip and the earlobe was 9.2% with 95% of measures differing by between -24.9 and 58.7%. There were no significant differences between sample sites (p = 0.201); however, there was a strong positive relationship (R2 = 0.9455). At the different lactate parameters, there were no differences in determining the heart rate (except at 4 mMol·L(-1) [p = 0.028], equating to 2 b·min(-1)) and power output between sample sites. In conclusion, this high level of agreement and negligible differences in prescribing exercise using power output and heart rate from commonly used lactate parameters, determined from the earlobe and the fingertip indicate that these sample sites could be used interchangeably for physiological assessment during cycle ergometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22240552     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318225f395

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  5 in total

1.  Differences in lactate exchange and removal abilities between high-level African and Caucasian 400-m track runners.

Authors:  Carine Bret; Jean-René Lacour; Muriel Bourdin; Elio Locatelli; Marco De Angelis; Marcello Faina; Abderrehmane Rahmani; Laurent Messonnier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A study on nonlinear estimation of submaximal effort tolerance based on the generalized MET concept and the 6MWT in pulmonary rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jan Szczegielniak; Krzysztof J Latawiec; Jacek Łuniewski; Rafał Stanisławski; Katarzyna Bogacz; Marcin Krajczy; Marek Rydel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Validation Study of a Noninvasive Lactate Threshold Device.

Authors:  Rebecca M McMorries; Dustin P Joubert; Eric J Jones; Mark D Faries
Journal:  Int J Exerc Sci       Date:  2019-01-01

4.  A method-comparison study regarding the validity and reliability of the Lactate Plus analyzer.

Authors:  Sarah Hart; Kathryn Drevets; Micah Alford; Amanda Salacinski; Brian E Hunt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Arterialized and venous blood lactate concentration difference during different exercise intensities.

Authors:  Leandro C Felippe; Guilherme A Ferreira; Fernando De-Oliveira; Flavio O Pires; Adriano E Lima-Silva
Journal:  J Exerc Sci Fit       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 3.103

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.