Literature DB >> 22240276

Scientific misconduct is worryingly prevalent in the UK, shows BMJ survey.

Aniket Tavare.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22240276     DOI： 10.1136/bmj.e377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN： 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Scientists Still Behaving Badly? A Survey Within Industry and Universities.

Authors:  Simon Godecharle; Steffen Fieuws; Ben Nemery; Kris Dierickx
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Biomedical authors' awareness of publication ethics: an international survey.

Authors:  Sara Schroter; Jason Roberts; Elizabeth Loder; Donald B Penzien; Sarah Mahadeo; Timothy T Houle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  Keep calm and carry on: moral panic, predatory publishers, peer review, and the emperor's new clothes.

Authors:  Frank Houghton
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2022-04-01

4.  Frequency of discrepancies in retracted clinical trial reports versus unretracted reports: blinded case-control study.

Authors:  Graham D Cole; Alexandra N Nowbar; Michael Mielewczik; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Darrel P Francis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-09-20

5.  Launching "Research Audit Units" to Curb Research Misconduct.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Namazi; Mohammad Mahdi Parvizi
Journal:  Int J Prev Med       Date:  2018-08-14
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.