Literature DB >> 22240073

Any difference? Use of a CAM provider among cancer patients, coronary heart disease (CHD) patients and individuals with no cancer/CHD.

Agnete E Kristoffersen1, Arne J Norheim, Vinjar M Fønnebø.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cancer patients has been described previously, prevalence of use has not commonly been compared to other disease groups in a true population sample where CAM use or cancer is not the main focus. The aims of the present study are to (1) examine how CAM use in cancer patients differs from people with a previous CHD diagnosis and people with no cancer or CHD diagnosis in an unselected general population and (2), investigate the use of a CAM provider among individuals with a previous cancer diagnosis.
METHODS: A total of 8040 men and women aged 29 to 87 in the city of Tromsø, Norway filled in a questionnaire developed specifically for the Tromsø V study with questions on life style and health issues. Visits to a CAM provider within the last 12 months and information on cancer, heart attack and angina pectoris (heart cramp) were among the questions. 1449 respondents were excluded from the analyses.
RESULTS: Among the 6591 analysed respondents 331 had a prior cancer diagnosis, of whom 7.9% reported to have seen a CAM provider within the last 12 months. This did not differ significantly from neither the CHD group (6.4%, p = 0.402) nor the no cancer/CHD group (9.5%, p = 0.325).
CONCLUSION: According to this study, the proportion of cancer patients seeing a CAM provider was not statistically significantly different from patients with CHD or individuals without cancer or CHD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22240073      PMCID: PMC3305410          DOI: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med        ISSN: 1472-6882            Impact factor:   3.659


  31 in total

1.  Does use of alternative medicine predict survival from cancer?

Authors:  T Risberg; A Vickers; R M Bremnes; E A Wist; S Kaasa; B R Cassileth
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.162

2.  Norwegian law brings alternative medicine to the mainstream.

Authors:  Robert Longtin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  High prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients: implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Barrie R Cassileth; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  E Ernst; B R Cassileth
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  The use of non-proven therapy among patients treated in Norwegian oncological departments. A cross-sectional national multicentre study.

Authors:  T Risberg; E Lund; E Wist; O Dahl; S Sundstrøm; O K Andersen; S Kaasa
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Complementary and alternative medicine use is associated with an increased perception of breast cancer risk and death.

Authors:  Eileen Rakovitch; Jean-Philippe Pignol; Carole Chartier; Michelle Ezer; Sunil Verma; George Dranitsaris; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 7.  A policy analysis of the Expert Patient in the United Kingdom: self-care as an expression of pastoral power?

Authors:  P M Wilson
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2001-05

8.  Cancer patients use of nonproven therapy: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  T Risberg; E Lund; E Wist; S Kaasa; T Wilsgaard
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Cancer patients' insight into their treatment, prognosis, and unconventional therapies.

Authors:  R N Eidinger; D V Schapira
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1984-06-15       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Approaching complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with cancer: questions and challenges.

Authors:  Eran Ben-Arye; Moshe Frenkel; Ruth Stashefsky Margalit
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2004 Jan-Mar
View more
  8 in total

1.  Consultations with complementary and alternative medicine practitioners by older Australians: results from a national survey.

Authors:  Laurann Yen; Tanisha Jowsey; Ian S McRae
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.659

2.  Gender differences in prevalence and associations for use of CAM in a large population study.

Authors:  Agnete E Kristoffersen; Trine Stub; Anita Salamonsen; Frauke Musial; Katarina Hamberg
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.659

3.  Prevalence and associations for use of a traditional medicine provider in the SAMINOR 1 Survey: a population-based study on Health and Living Conditions in Regions with Sami and Norwegian Populations.

Authors:  Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen; Trine Stub; Marita Melhus; Ann Ragnhild Broderstad
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.659

4.  Prevalence and predictors of complementary and alternative medicine use among people with coronary heart disease or at risk for this in the sixth Tromsø study: a comparative analysis using protection motivation theory.

Authors:  Agnete E Kristoffersen; Fuschia M Sirois; Trine Stub; Anne Helen Hansen
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.659

5.  Use of complementary and alternative medicine in Norway: a cross-sectional survey with a modified Norwegian version of the international questionnaire to measure use of complementary and alternative medicine (I-CAM-QN).

Authors:  Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen; Sara A Quandt; Trine Stub
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-03-16

6.  Conventional health care service utilization among cancer survivors that visit traditional and complementary providers in the Tromsø study: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kiwumulo Nakandi; Dana Mora; Trine Stub; Agnete E Kristoffersen
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use among Norwegian Cancer Survivors: Gender-Specific Prevalence and Associations for Use.

Authors:  Agnete E Kristoffersen; Arne J Norheim; Vinjar M Fønnebø
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 2.629

8.  Use of traditional and complementary medicine among Norwegian cancer patients in the seventh survey of the Tromsø study.

Authors:  Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen; Trine Stub; Ann Ragnhild Broderstad; Anne Helen Hansen
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 3.659

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.