Literature DB >> 22239262

Venous and pulmonary thromboembolism and combined hormonal contraceptives. Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Francisca Martínez1, Isabel Ramírez, Ezequiel Pérez-Campos, Kepa Latorre, Iñaki Lete.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review of studies published between January 1995 and April 2010 aimed at determining the effect of combined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs), administered orally, transdermally or vaginally, on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE).
RESULTS: Of the 625 potentially eligible references reviewed, 25 studies meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria were entered in the meta-analysis. The pooled relative risks of VTE associated with the various CHCs, depending on their progestogen, were: gestodene vs. levonorgestrel 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-1.63); desogestrel vs. levonorgestrel 1.93 (95% CI: 1.31-2.83); and drospirenone vs. levonorgestrel 1.67 (95% CI: 1.10-2.55). The pooled adjusted odds ratio for norgestimate vs. levonorgestrel was 1.11 (95% CI: 0.84-1.46) and that for cyproterone acetate vs. levonorgestrel 1.65 (95% CI: 1.30-2.11).
CONCLUSIONS: The safest CHCs in terms of VTE are those containing levonorgestrel or norgestimate. The risk of VTE associated with desogestrel-, drospirenone- or cyproterone acetate-containing CHCs is greater than that associated with CHCs containing levonorgestrel. The increased risk of VTE found for CHCs with gestodene compared to CHCs with levonorgestrel seems smaller than in previous analyses. There were no differences in VTE risk between oral and transdermal CHCs containing norgestimate or norelgestromin, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22239262     DOI: 10.3109/13625187.2011.643836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care        ISSN: 1362-5187            Impact factor:   1.848


  11 in total

1.  Hormonal Contraception Use is Common Among Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases and an Elevated Risk of Deep Vein Thrombosis.

Authors:  Cary C Cotton; Donna Baird; Robert S Sandler; Millie D Long
Journal:  Inflamm Bowel Dis       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 5.325

2.  Hormonal anticonception anno 2013: a clinician's view.

Authors:  M Dhont; V Verhaeghe
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2013

3.  Multinational, multicentre, randomised, open-label study evaluating the impact of a 91-day extended regimen combined oral contraceptive, compared with two 28-day traditional combined oral contraceptives, on haemostatic parameters in healthy women.

Authors:  Rossella E Nappi; Anna Maria Paoletti; Annibale Volpe; Luca Chiovato; Brandon Howard; Herman Weiss; Nancy Ricciotti
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 1.848

4.  Economic evaluation of a novel genetic screening test for risk of venous thromboembolism compared with standard of care in women considering combined hormonal contraception in Switzerland.

Authors:  C Simone Sutherland; Zanfina Ademi; Joëlle Michaud; Nadine Schur; Myriam Lingg; Arjun Bhadhuri; Thierry D Pache; Johannes Bitzer; Pierre Suchon; Valerie Albert; Kurt E Hersberger; Goranka Tanackovic; Matthias Schwenkglenks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Managing thromboembolic risk with menopausal hormone therapy and hormonal contraception in the COVID-19 pandemic: Recommendations from the Spanish Menopause Society, Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia and Sociedad Española de Trombosis y Hemostasia.

Authors:  Isabel Ramírez; Esther De la Viuda; Laura Baquedano; Pluvio Coronado; Plácido Llaneza; Nicolás Mendoza; Borja Otero; Sonia Sánchez; Mª Jesús Cancelo; José Antonio Páramo; Antonio Cano
Journal:  Maturitas       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Association of Hormonal Contraceptive Use With Adverse Health Outcomes: An Umbrella Review of Meta-analyses of Randomized Clinical Trials and Cohort Studies.

Authors:  Sharmila Brabaharan; Sajesh K Veettil; Jennifer E Kaiser; Vrosha Rau Raja Rao; Rujira Wattanayingcharoenchai; Marikannan Maharajan; Putsarat Insin; Pattarawalai Talungchit; Thunyarat Anothaisintawee; Ammarin Thakkinstian; Nathorn Chaiyakunapruk
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04

Review 7.  The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism with Different Generation of Oral Contraceptives; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alireza Baratloo; Saeed Safari; Alaleh Rouhipour; Behrooz Hashemi; Farhad Rahmati; Maryam Motamedi; Mohammadmehdi Forouzanfar; Pauline Haroutunian
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2014

8.  The Risk of Venous Thromboembolism Associated with Oral Contraceptive; the Search Is Still On.

Authors:  Ali Abdalvand
Journal:  Emerg (Tehran)       Date:  2014

Review 9.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of venous thrombosis risk among users of combined oral contraception.

Authors:  Monica V Dragoman; Naomi K Tepper; Rongwei Fu; Kathryn M Curtis; Roger Chou; Mary E Gaffield
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.561

10. 

Authors:  Alberto López García-Franco; José Antonio Baeyens Fernández; Emilia Bailón Muñoz; M José Iglesias Piñeiro; Isabel Del Cura González; Amparo Ortega Del Moral; Jacinta Landa Goñi; Pablo Alonso Coello; Lorenzo Arribas Mir
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.137

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.