Literature DB >> 22237760

Short tone bursts are better than clicks for cervical vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials in clinical practice.

David Viciana1, Jose A Lopez-Escamez.   

Abstract

Our aim is to compare short tone burst (STB)--and clicks--stimuli to evoke vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs) in healthy controls. A cross-sectional study in which VEMPs were measured in two sets of 185 and 55 normal volunteers by an air-conducted 500 Hz STBs and clicks, respectively. The test-retest reliability between different sessions was assessed in two subsets of 35 individuals. Moreover, 53 individuals were examined with both stimuli within the same session. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were used to assess reliability for P1 and N1 latencies, corrected amplitude and asymmetry ratio (AR). The results included that STBs produced a reliable response between different sessions (N = 35; [ICC] = 0.61-0.94, all p < 0.0001). Although clicks produced a reliable response for P1 and N1 latencies and corrected amplitudes (ICC = 0.62-0.74, all p < 0.0001), the amplitude ratio showed a lower reliability [ICC = 0.32 (-0.10 to 0.59)]. The amplitude of VEMP was consistently larger with 500 Hz STBs than clicks for a given sound pressure level. Within the same session, STBs evoked a response in 52/53 subjects (98%) whereas clicks evoked VEMPs only in 44/53 individuals (83%). Conclusions revealed that a 500 Hz STBs elicited consistently larger amplitudes, better reliability across recording sessions and fewer missing responses compared with click-induced VEMPs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22237760     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1912-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  25 in total

1.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: test-retest reliability.

Authors:  M Versino; S Colnaghi; R Callieco; V Cosi
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2001 Oct-Dec

2.  Normative data for P1/N1-latencies of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials induced by air- or bone-conducted tone bursts.

Authors:  Dietmar Basta; Ingo Todt; Arne Ernst
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.708

3.  Age-related differences in parameters of vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Sun Kyu Lee; Chang Il Cha; Tae Suk Jung; Dong Choon Park; Seung Geun Yeo
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 1.494

Review 4.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: past, present and future.

Authors:  S M Rosengren; M S Welgampola; J G Colebatch
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials are heavily dependent on type I hair cell activity of the saccular macula in guinea pigs.

Authors:  June-Horng Lue; An-Shiou Day; Po-Wen Cheng; Yi-Ho Young
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 1.854

6.  Characterization of age-related changes in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Dietmar Basta; Ingo Todt; Arne Ernst
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.435

7.  Sacculocollic reflex arcs in cats.

Authors:  Y Uchino; H Sato; M Sasaki; M Imagawa; H Ikegami; N Isu; W Graf
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Myogenic potentials generated by a click-evoked vestibulocollic reflex.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; G M Halmagyi; N F Skuse
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Short tone burst-evoked myogenic potentials on the sternocleidomastoid muscle: are these potentials also of vestibular origin?

Authors:  T Murofushi; M Matsuzaki; C H Wu
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1999-06

Review 10.  Characteristics and clinical applications of vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Miriam S Welgampola; James G Colebatch
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  6 in total

1.  Comparison of chirp versus click and tone pip stimulation for cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Bo-Chen Wang; Yong Liang; Xiao-Long Liu; Jing Zhao; You-Li Liu; Yan-Fei Li; Wei Zhang; Qi Li
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Band limited chirp stimulation in vestibular evoked myogenic potentials.

Authors:  Leif Erik Walther; Mario Cebulla
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Association between hearing loss and saccular dysfunction in older individuals.

Authors:  Maria Geraldine Zuniga; Roni E Dinkes; Marcela Davalos-Bichara; John P Carey; Michael C Schubert; W Michael King; Jeremy Walston; Yuri Agrawal
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.311

4.  Using Narrow Band CE-Chirps to Elicit Cervical Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials.

Authors:  Quentin Mat; Naïma Deggouj; Jean-Pierre Duterme; Sophie Tainmont; Christophe Lelubre; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 May/Jun       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  The role of cervical and ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in the assessment of patients with vestibular schwannomas.

Authors:  Elodie Chiarovano; Cynthia Darlington; Pierre-Paul Vidal; Georges Lamas; Catherine de Waele
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Optimizing Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials With Narrow Band CE-Chirps.

Authors:  Quentin Mat; Jean-Pierre Duterme; Sophie Tainmont; Christophe Lelubre; Mario Manto
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2021 Sep/Oct       Impact factor: 3.570

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.