Literature DB >> 22237501

Inbreeding affects sexual signalling in males but not females of Tenebrio molitor.

Mari Pölkki1, Indrikis Krams, Katariina Kangassalo, Markus J Rantala.   

Abstract

In many species of animals, individuals advertise their quality with sexual signals to obtain mates. Chemical signals such as volatile pheromones are species specific, and their primary purpose is to influence mate choice by carrying information about the phenotypic and genetic quality of the sender. The deleterious effects of consanguineous mating on individual quality are generally known, whereas the effect of inbreeding on sexual signalling is poorly understood. Here, we tested whether inbreeding reduces the attractiveness of sexual signalling in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor, by testing the preferences for odours of inbred and outbred (control) individuals of the opposite sex. Females were more attracted to the odours produced by outbred males than the odours produced by inbred males, suggesting that inbreeding reduces the attractiveness of male sexual signalling. However, we did not find any difference between the attractiveness of inbred and outbred female odours, which may indicate that the quality of females is either irrelevant for T. molitor males or quality is not revealed through female odours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22237501      PMCID: PMC3367757          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.1135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  13 in total

1.  Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana.

Authors:  J Aspi
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Parasites reduce attractiveness and reproductive success in male grain beetles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 3.  The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence.

Authors:  R Bonduriansky
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2001-08

4.  Do pheromones reveal male immunocompetence?

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Ilmari Jokinen; Raine Kortet; Anssi Vainikka; Jukka Suhonen
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  The role of juvenile hormone in immune function and pheromone production trade-offs: a test of the immunocompetence handicap principle.

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Anssi Vainikka; Raine Kortet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2003-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.

Authors:  Laurent Lehmann; Lukas F Keller; Hanna Kokko
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2006-08-12       Impact factor: 2.691

7.  Should females prefer dominant males?

Authors:  A Qvarnström; E Forsgren
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 17.712

8.  Effects of inbreeding on potential and realized immune responses in Tenebrio molitor.

Authors:  Markus J Rantala; Heidi Viitaniemi; Derek A Roff
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.234

9.  Inbreeding and extreme outbreeding cause sex differences in immune defence and life history traits in Epirrita autumnata.

Authors:  M J Rantala; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Females prefer the scent of outbred males: good-genes-as-heterozygosity?

Authors:  Petteri Ilmonen; Gloria Stundner; Michaela Thoss; Dustin J Penn
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-05-16       Impact factor: 3.260

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The joy of sex pheromones.

Authors:  Carolina Gomez-Diaz; Richard Benton
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 8.807

2.  The scent of inbreeding: a male sex pheromone betrays inbred males.

Authors:  Erik van Bergen; Paul M Brakefield; Stéphanie Heuskin; Bas J Zwaan; Caroline M Nieberding
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Resource availability as a proxy for terminal investment in a beetle.

Authors:  Indrikis A Krams; Tatjana Krama; Fhionna R Moore; Markus J Rantala; Raivo Mänd; Pranas Mierauskas; Marika Mänd
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  A dark cuticle allows higher investment in immunity, longevity and fecundity in a beetle upon a simulated parasite attack.

Authors:  Indrikis Krams; Gordon M Burghardt; Ronalds Krams; Giedrius Trakimas; Ants Kaasik; Severi Luoto; Markus J Rantala; Tatjana Krama
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Individual Pheromone Signature in Males: Prerequisite for Pheromone-Mediated Mate Assessment in the Central American Locust, Schistocerca Piceifrons.

Authors:  Christiane Stahr; Karsten Seidelmann
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Influence of Inbreeding on Female Mate Choice in Two Species of Drosophila.

Authors:  Amberle A McKee; Shanna M Newton; Ashley J R Carter
Journal:  J Insect Behav       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 1.309

Review 7.  The use of yellow mealworm (T. molitor) as alternative source of protein in poultry diets: a review.

Authors:  L Selaledi; C A Mbajiorgu; M Mabelebele
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 1.559

Review 8.  The Role of Sexual Selection in the Evolution of Chemical Signals in Insects.

Authors:  Sandra Steiger; Johannes Stökl
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Evidence for inbreeding depression and pre-copulatory, but not post copulatory inbreeding avoidance in the cabbage beetle Colaphellus bowringi.

Authors:  XingPing Liu; XiaoYun Tu; HaiMin He; Chao Chen; FangSen Xue
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Inbreeding reveals mode of past selection on male reproductive characters in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Outi Ala-Honkola; David J Hosken; Mollie K Manier; Stefan Lüpold; Elizabeth M Droge-Young; Kirstin S Berben; William F Collins; John M Belote; Scott Pitnick
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.