Literature DB >> 22236885

Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.

Jon S Matsumura1, William Gray, Seemant Chaturvedi, Dai Yamanouchi, Lei Peng, Patrick Verta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) study was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of two devices for carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in patients at high risk for carotid endarterectomy (CEA): (1) a new embolic protection device, the Emboshield Pro (Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Ill), using the periprocedural composite end point of 30-day death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (DSMI), and (2) a carotid stent in conjunction with an embolic protection device (EPD) using the DSMI periprocedural composite end point plus ipsilateral stroke at up to 3 years for long-term evaluation.
METHODS: This prospective, multicenter clinical trial enrolled 220 consecutive participants between November 29, 2006, and January 14, 2008, followed by a second cohort of 102 participants between January 14 and June 18, 2008. Enrolled participants had carotid stenosis (symptomatic >50% or asymptomatic >80%). The first 220 subjects underwent distal EPD placement with a new large-diameter filter, and the second cohort of 102 underwent placement of an older EPD that is no longer manufactured. All 322 participants were to be treated with a dedicated carotid stent with a tapered, small, closed-cell design (Xact; Abbott Vascular) and were to be included in the long-term evaluation. Independent neurologic assessment was performed before CAS and at 1 day, 30 days, and annually after CAS. All primary end point events were independently adjudicated by a central committee.
RESULTS: The periprocedural composite end point of DSMI (95% confidence interval) in the first 220 participants was 2.3% (0.74%, 5.22%), with a combined death and stroke rate of 1.8% (0.50%, 4.59%) and a rate of death and major stroke of 0.5% (0.01%, 2.51%). As of January 3, 2011, the median follow-up for the entire 322-subject cohort for the long-term evaluation was 2.8 years. Freedom from the periprocedural composite of DSMI plus ipsilateral stroke thereafter was 95.4%, with an annualized ipsilateral stroke rate of 0.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: CAS outcomes in patients at high risk for CEA have improved from earlier carotid stent trials. With periprocedural rates of DSMI of 2.3%, death or stroke at 1.8%, and death or major stroke rate of 0.5%, PROTECT has the lowest rate of periprocedural complications among other comparable single-arm CAS trials in patients at high risk for CEA.
Copyright © 2012 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22236885     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

Review 1.  State of the art in carotid artery stenting: trial data, technical aspects, and limitations.

Authors:  Rajan A G Patel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Treatment of carotid stenosis in asymptomatic, nonoctogenarian, standard risk patients with stenting versus endarterectomy trials.

Authors:  Jon S Matsumura; Bret M Hanlon; Kenneth Rosenfield; Jenifer H Voeks; George Howard; Gary S Roubin; Thomas G Brott
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2021-10-22       Impact factor: 4.860

Review 3.  Carotid artery stenting: current and emerging options.

Authors:  Simon Morr; Ning Lin; Adnan H Siddiqui
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2014-10-20

4.  Standard Carotid Endarterectomy versus Carotid Artery Stenting with Closed-Cell Stent Design and Distal Embolic Protection: does the age matter?

Authors:  A Peluso; D Turchino; A Petrone; A M Giribono; R Bracale; L Del Guercio; U M Bracale
Journal:  Transl Med UniSa       Date:  2019-01-06

Review 5.  Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Mazurek; Krzysztof Malinowski; Kenneth Rosenfield; Laura Capoccia; Francesco Speziale; Gianmarco de Donato; Carlo Setacci; Christian Wissgott; Pasqualino Sirignano; Lukasz Tekieli; Andrey Karpenko; Waclaw Kuczmik; Eugenio Stabile; David Christopher Metzger; Max Amor; Adnan H Siddiqui; Antonio Micari; Piotr Pieniążek; Alberto Cremonesi; Joachim Schofer; Andrej Schmidt; Piotr Musialek
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Comparison and Analysis between the NAV6 Embolic Protection Filter and SpiderFX EPD Filter in Superficial Femoral Artery Lesions.

Authors:  Prakash Krishnan; Arthur Tarricone; Allen Gee; Serdar Farhan; Haroon Kamran; Annapoorna Kini; Samin Sharma
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Enlarged Parent Artery Lumen at Aneurysmal-Neck Segment in Wide-Necked Distal Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms.

Authors:  Jong Won Lee; Jung Min Woo; Ok Kyun Lim; Ye-Eun Jo; Jae Kyun Kim; Eun Sang Kim; Deok Hee Lee
Journal:  Neurointervention       Date:  2015-09-02

8.  Clinical study of stent forming for symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Yiqin Zhang; Wen'an Wang; Qi Fang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.