Michael Dennis1, Adil Kadri, John Coffey. 1. College of Medicine, Swansea University, Grove Building, Swansea University Singleton Park, Swansea, Wales SA2 8PP, UK. m.s.dennis@swansea.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: depression is common in later life, particularly in people with poor physical health. In the acute hospital setting this is associated with poor outcomes, increased length of stay and compromised care. The recognition and diagnosis of depression is therefore a key first step in managing depression in the general hospital, and this may be facilitated by the use of an appropriate screening instrument. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study is to review all relevant literature on rating scales used to detect depression in older people in general hospitals so as to identify the most appropriate tool and cut-off score with optimal performance. METHOD: an electronic search was conducted applying key search terms. Selection of articles was conducted in a staged manner and by utilising predetermined quality criteria. When appropriate pooled analysis was undertaken. FINDINGS: only 14 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and only one instrument-the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-has been studied to an adequate extent in older people in the acute general hospital setting. Best performance for the GDS was for a cut-off of 5/6 for the GDS-15 and 10/11 for the GDS-30. CONCLUSION: further research is required before recommending the use of brief depression screening instruments (single or two items) in the acute hospital setting. The GDS would appear the most validated instrument currently (in either 15 or 30 item versions), though other tools such as the BASDEC show promise.
BACKGROUND:depression is common in later life, particularly in people with poor physical health. In the acute hospital setting this is associated with poor outcomes, increased length of stay and compromised care. The recognition and diagnosis of depression is therefore a key first step in managing depression in the general hospital, and this may be facilitated by the use of an appropriate screening instrument. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study is to review all relevant literature on rating scales used to detect depression in older people in general hospitals so as to identify the most appropriate tool and cut-off score with optimal performance. METHOD: an electronic search was conducted applying key search terms. Selection of articles was conducted in a staged manner and by utilising predetermined quality criteria. When appropriate pooled analysis was undertaken. FINDINGS: only 14 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria and only one instrument-the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS)-has been studied to an adequate extent in older people in the acute general hospital setting. Best performance for the GDS was for a cut-off of 5/6 for the GDS-15 and 10/11 for the GDS-30. CONCLUSION: further research is required before recommending the use of brief depression screening instruments (single or two items) in the acute hospital setting. The GDS would appear the most validated instrument currently (in either 15 or 30 item versions), though other tools such as the BASDEC show promise.
Authors: Ami L DeWaters; Matthieu Chansard; Antonio Anzueto; Mary Jo Pugh; Eric M Mortensen Journal: Am J Med Sci Date: 2017-11-20 Impact factor: 2.378
Authors: Heidi Lindroth; Lisa Bratzke; Sara Twadell; Paul Rowley; Janie Kildow; Mara Danner; Lily Turner; Brandon Hernandez; Roger Brown; Robert D Sanders Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Marcus Povitz; Carmelle E Bolo; Steven J Heitman; Willis H Tsai; JianLi Wang; Matthew T James Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Michael McGillion; Jennifer Yost; Andrew Turner; Duane Bender; Ted Scott; Sandra Carroll; Paul Ritvo; Elizabeth Peter; Andre Lamy; Gill Furze; Kirsten Krull; Valerie Dunlop; Amber Good; Nazari Dvirnik; Debbie Bedini; Frank Naus; Shirley Pettit; Shaunattonie Henry; Christine Probst; Joseph Mills; Elaine Gossage; Irene Travale; Janine Duquette; Christy Taberner; Sanjeev Bhavnani; James S Khan; David Cowan; Eric Romeril; John Lee; Tracey Colella; Manon Choinière; Jason Busse; Joel Katz; J Charles Victor; Jeffrey Hoch; Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai; Sharon Kaasalainen; Salima Ladak; Sheila O'Keefe-McCarthy; Monica Parry; Daniel I Sessler; Michael Stacey; Bonnie Stevens; Robyn Stremler; Lehana Thabane; Judy Watt-Watson; Richard Whitlock; Joy C MacDermid; Marit Leegaard; Robert McKelvie; Michael Hillmer; Lynn Cooper; Gavin Arthur; Krista Sider; Susan Oliver; Karen Boyajian; Mark Farrow; Chris Lawton; Darryl Gamble; Jake Walsh; Mark Field; Sandra LeFort; Wendy Clyne; Maria Ricupero; Laurie Poole; Karsten Russell-Wood; Michael Weber; Jolene McNeil; Robyn Alpert; Sarah Sharpe; Sue Bhella; David Mohajer; Sem Ponnambalam; Naeem Lakhani; Rabia Khan; Peter Liu; P J Devereaux Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2016-08-01