Literature DB >> 22236476

The methodology of negative pressure wound therapy: separating fact from fiction.

Graeme E Glass1, Jagdeep Nanchahal.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is a technique that has gained such rapid acceptance for such a diversity of wound management problems that the evidence for optimal use has struggled to keep up. While clinical studies have sought to evaluate its effectiveness for a variety of acute and chronic wounds, preclinical studies have suggested that features such as the magnitude and periodicity of negative pressure, the wound filler and interface materials and the drainage conduit might introduce key pathophysiological variations at the wound bed influencing healing. Optimising the methodological approach is the key to achieving the best outcomes with NPWT. The aim of the present study was to evaluate and summarise the clinical and experimental evidence for how these methodological variations influence wound healing when using NPWT.
METHODS: A literature review was conducted to evaluate each component of NPWT inciting methodological variation with reference to clinical and preclinical variables including wound volume reduction, blood flow, granulation and growth factor stimulation.
RESULTS: Fourteen commercially available NPWT systems are currently available. Both foam and gauze transmit NP efficiently. While some preclinical evidence suggests foam may preferentially promote cell proliferation, there is no clear evidence to favour one wound filler. Most wound contraction occurs within the first -50 mmHg and physiological optimisation may be achieved within -80 mmHg. Cyclical NP-mediated cell mechanotransduction may alter the healing characteristics of the wound bed but no definitive clinical protocol has been established. There is insufficient evidence to credit NPWT with reduced bacterial wound colonisation.
CONCLUSION: There is an urgent need to develop evidence-based NPWT regimes, tailoring the methodological aspects of therapy to the clinical need. An individualised strategy may yield improved outcomes and realise the potential of this powerful therapeutic intervention.
Copyright © 2011 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22236476     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  9 in total

1.  A novel facilitated negative-pressure wound therapy for thoracic incision infection after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Zhi-Tian Wang; Jin-Lin Cao; Ping Yuan; Lu-Ming Wang; Zhe-Hao He; Wang Lv; Jian Hu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  A randomized trial of negative pressure wound therapy technology combined with intermittent instillation in the treatment of neck anastomotic leakage after esophageal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Bao-Jia Luo; Hui-Qin Zhang; Jiu-Di Zhong; Xiang-Zi He; Fang Shen; Mei-Chun Zheng; Yong-Shan Wen; Jin-Bo Li; Ming-Zhu Xin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-12

3.  Negative pressure wound therapy: experience in 45 dogs.

Authors:  Kathryn A Pitt; Bryden J Stanley
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 1.495

4.  Acceleration of Diabetic Wound Healing with PHD2- and miR-210-Targeting Oligonucleotides.

Authors:  Anne Dallas; Artem Trotsyuk; Heini Ilves; Clark A Bonham; Melanie Rodrigues; Karl Engel; Janos A Barrera; Nina Kosaric; Zachary A Stern-Buchbinder; Aleksandr White; Kenneth J Mandell; Paula T Hammond; Jonathan Mansbridge; Sumedha Jayasena; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Brian H Johnston
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Superior Enhancement of Cutaneous Microcirculation Due to "Cyclic" Application of a Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device in Humans - Local and Remote Effects.

Authors:  Alexander Sogorski; Amira Becker; Mehran Dadras; Christoph Wallner; Johannes Maximillian Wagner; Maxi V Glinski; Marcus Lehnhardt; Björn Behr
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

Review 6.  Soft-tissue reconstruction of open fractures of the lower limb: muscle versus fasciocutaneous flaps.

Authors:  James K-K Chan; Lorraine Harry; Garry Williams; Jagdeep Nanchahal
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.169

7.  Negative pressure wound therapy for the treatment of the open abdomen and incidence of enteral fistulas: a retrospective bicentre analysis.

Authors:  Sven Richter; Stefan Dold; Johannes P Doberauer; Peter Mai; Jochen Schuld
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Application of the Single Use Negative Pressure Wound Therapy Device (PICO) on a Heterogeneous Group of Surgical and Traumatic Wounds.

Authors:  Caroline Payne; Daren Edwards
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2014-04-28

Review 9.  Enhancing wound healing dressing development through interdisciplinary collaboration.

Authors:  Briauna Hawthorne; J Kai Simmons; Braden Stuart; Robert Tung; David S Zamierowski; Adam J Mellott
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2021-05-17       Impact factor: 3.368

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.