| Literature DB >> 22235195 |
Nahid Shahabadi1, Soheila Kashanian, Maryam Mahdavi, Noorkaram Sourinejad.
Abstract
A new Pt(II) complex,Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22235195 PMCID: PMC3253441 DOI: 10.1155/2011/525794
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Bioinorg Chem Appl Impact factor: 7.778
Scheme 1
Figure 1The structure and 1H NMR labeling of the [Pt(DIP)(LL)](NO3)2 complex.
Figure 2(a) 1H NMR spectrum, (b) UV-vis spectrum, and (c) FT-IR spectrum of the platinum complex.
1H NMR chemical shifts of 4,7-diphenyl-1,10-phenanthroline (DIP) and N,N-dimethyltrimethylenediamine ligand (LL) and [Pt(DIP)(LL)](NO3)2 complex.
| Protons | Ph | H1′ | H2′ | H3′ | 1CH2 | 2CH2 | 3CH2 | NH2 | Me |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIP | 7.8 | 9.7 | 8.2 | ||||||
| LL | 3.23 | 2.01 | 2.52 | 2.3 | 2.68 | ||||
| *[Pt(DIP)(LL)]2+ | 7.48, 7.6 | 9.58, 9.61 | 8.07, 8.11 | 8.01, 8.03 | 3.03 | 1.86 | 2.46 | 2.16 | 2.41 |
Figure 3Absorption spectra of Pt(II) complex (5 × 10−5 M) in the absence and presence of increasing amounts of CT DNA: r = 0.0, 0.1, 0.6, 1. 1.5, and 2.
Figure 4Effect of increasing amounts of complex on the viscosity of CT-DNA (5 × 10−5 M) in 10 mM Tris-HCl.
Figure 5Fluorescence spectra of Pt(II) complex in the presence of various concentrations of CT DNA.
Figure 6Plots of F 0/F versus [Q] for the binding of Pt(II) complex with CT DNA.
The quenching constants of Pt (II) complex by CT DNA at different temperatures ranging from 0–5 × 10−5 mol L−1 of CT DNA.
| T (K) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 283 | 0.958 | 13.615 | 13.615 |
| 288 | 0.997 | 17.268 | 17.268 |
| 310 | 0.992 | 23.126 | 23.126 |
Binding constants (K ), number of binding sites (n), and thermodynamic parameters of the Pt (II)-DNA system.
|
|
| Log |
|
| Δ | Δ | Δ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 283 | 1.74 | 7.289 | 1.9 × 107 | 0.94 | −186.42 | −111.79 | −263.66 |
| 288 | 1.421 | 5.965 | 9.22 × 105 | 0.994 | −187.72 | −111.79 | −263.66 |
| 310 | 1.191 | 5.162 | 14.5 × 104 | 0.987 | −193.52 | −111.79 | −263.66 |
Figure 7Circular dichroism spectra of CT DNA (5 × 10−5 M) in Tris-HCl (10 mM), in the presence of increasing amounts of the complex at the following stoichiometric ratios: r = [complex]/[DNA] = 0.0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, and 0.8.
Figure 8Cleavage of SC pUC19 DNA (50 μM) by platinum complex (100 μM) in the presence of H2O2 (100 μM), in 10 mM Tris-HCl/1 mM EDTA buffer (pH 8.0). lane 1: DNA Marker; lane 2: DNA control; lane 3: DNA + complex; lane 4: DNA + complex 1 + H2O2; lane 5: DNA + complex + H2O2 + DMSO (4 μL); lane 6: DNA + complex 1 + H2O2 + NaN3 (100 μM).