PURPOSE: Preclinical studies show that OXi4503 (combretastatin A1 diphosphate, CA1P) is more potent than other clinically evaluated vascular-disrupting agents. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Escalating doses of OXi4503 were given intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days to patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS: Doses were escalated in single-patient cohorts from 0.06 to 1.92 mg/m(2), then expanded cohorts to 15.4 mg/m(2) in 43 patients. Common adverse drug reactions were hypertension, tumor pain, anemia, lymphopenia, and easily controllable nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Five patients experienced different drug-related dose-limiting toxicities, atrial fibrillation, increased troponin, blurred vision, diplopia, and tumor lysis. Prophylactic amlodipine failed to prevent adverse events. Pharmacokinetics showed dose-dependent linear increases in peak plasma concentrations and area under the curve value of OXi4503. One partial response was seen in a heavily pretreated patient with ovarian cancer. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI confirmed a dose effect and showed significant antivascular effects in 10 of 13 patients treated at doses of 11 mg/m(2) or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose was 8.5 mg/m(2) but escalation to 14 mg/m(2) was possible with only temporary reversible cerebrovascular toxicity by excluding hypertensive patients. As a tumor response was seen at 14 mg/m(2) and maximum tumor perfusion reductions were seen at doses of 11 mg/m(2) or higher, the recommended phase II dose is from 11 to 14 mg/m(2).
PURPOSE: Preclinical studies show that OXi4503 (combretastatin A1 diphosphate, CA1P) is more potent than other clinically evaluated vascular-disrupting agents. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Escalating doses of OXi4503 were given intravenously over 10 minutes on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days to patients with advanced solid tumors. RESULTS: Doses were escalated in single-patient cohorts from 0.06 to 1.92 mg/m(2), then expanded cohorts to 15.4 mg/m(2) in 43 patients. Common adverse drug reactions were hypertension, tumor pain, anemia, lymphopenia, and easily controllable nausea/vomiting and fatigue. Five patients experienced different drug-related dose-limiting toxicities, atrial fibrillation, increased troponin, blurred vision, diplopia, and tumor lysis. Prophylactic amlodipine failed to prevent adverse events. Pharmacokinetics showed dose-dependent linear increases in peak plasma concentrations and area under the curve value of OXi4503. One partial response was seen in a heavily pretreated patient with ovarian cancer. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI confirmed a dose effect and showed significant antivascular effects in 10 of 13 patients treated at doses of 11 mg/m(2) or higher. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose was 8.5 mg/m(2) but escalation to 14 mg/m(2) was possible with only temporary reversible cerebrovascular toxicity by excluding hypertensivepatients. As a tumor response was seen at 14 mg/m(2) and maximum tumor perfusion reductions were seen at doses of 11 mg/m(2) or higher, the recommended phase II dose is from 11 to 14 mg/m(2).
Authors: Ravi Kumar Vyas Devambatla; Wei Li; Nilesh Zaware; Shruti Choudhary; Ernest Hamel; Susan L Mooberry; Aleem Gangjee Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Lett Date: 2017-05-27 Impact factor: 2.823
Authors: Laxman Devkota; Chen-Ming Lin; Tracy E Strecker; Yifan Wang; Justin K Tidmore; Zhi Chen; Rajsekhar Guddneppanavar; Christopher J Jelinek; Ramona Lopez; Li Liu; Ernest Hamel; Ralph P Mason; David J Chaplin; Mary Lynn Trawick; Kevin G Pinney Journal: Bioorg Med Chem Date: 2016-01-06 Impact factor: 3.641
Authors: Blake A Winn; Laxman Devkota; Bunnarack Kuch; Matthew T MacDonough; Tracy E Strecker; Yifan Wang; Zhe Shi; Jeni L Gerberich; Deboprosad Mondal; Alejandro J Ramirez; Ernest Hamel; David J Chaplin; Peter Davis; Ralph P Mason; Mary Lynn Trawick; Kevin G Pinney Journal: J Nat Prod Date: 2020-03-20 Impact factor: 4.050
Authors: Ravi Kumar Vyas Devambatla; Ojas A Namjoshi; Shruti Choudhary; Ernest Hamel; Corena V Shaffer; Cristina C Rohena; Susan L Mooberry; Aleem Gangjee Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-06-07 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Li Liu; Devin O'Kelly; Regan Schuetze; Graham Carlson; Heling Zhou; Mary Lynn Trawick; Kevin G Pinney; Ralph P Mason Journal: Molecules Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 4.411
Authors: J Cummings; M Zweifel; N Smith; P Ross; J Peters; G Rustin; P Price; M R Middleton; T Ward; C Dive Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 7.640