Literature DB >> 22234383

Manchester Clinical Placement Index (MCPI). Conditions for medical students' learning in hospital and community placements.

Tim Dornan1, Arno Muijtjens, Jennifer Graham, Albert Scherpbier, Henny Boshuizen.   

Abstract

The drive to quality-manage medical education has created a need for valid measurement instruments. Validity evidence includes the theoretical and contextual origin of items, choice of response processes, internal structure, and interrelationship of a measure's variables. This research set out to explore the validity and potential utility of an 11-item measurement instrument, whose theoretical and empirical origins were in an Experience Based Learning model of how medical students learn in communities of practice (COPs), and whose contextual origins were in a community-oriented, horizontally integrated, undergraduate medical programme. The objectives were to examine the psychometric properties of the scale in both hospital and community COPs and provide validity evidence to support using it to measure the quality of placements. The instrument was administered twice to students learning in both hospital and community placements and analysed using exploratory factor analysis and a generalizability analysis. 754 of a possible 902 questionnaires were returned (84% response rate), representing 168 placements. Eight items loaded onto two factors, which accounted for 78% of variance in the hospital data and 82% of variance in the community data. One factor was the placement learning environment, whose five constituent items were how learners were received at the start of the placement, people's supportiveness, and the quality of organisation, leadership, and facilities. The other factor represented the quality of training-instruction in skills, observing students performing skills, and providing students with feedback. Alpha coefficients ranged between 0.89 and 0.93 and there were no redundant or ambiguous items. Generalisability analysis showed that between 7 and 11 raters would be needed to achieve acceptable reliability. There is validity evidence to support using the simple 8-item, mixed methods Manchester Clinical Placement Index to measure key conditions for undergraduate medical students' experience based learning: the quality of the learning environment and the training provided within it. Its conceptual orientation is towards Communities of Practice, which is a dominant contemporary theory in undergraduate medical education.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22234383      PMCID: PMC3490061          DOI: 10.1007/s10459-011-9344-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract        ISSN: 1382-4996            Impact factor:   3.853


  18 in total

1.  What happens to the student? The neglected variable in educational outcome research.

Authors:  O ten Cate
Journal:  Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.853

2.  Understanding clinical teachers: looking beyond assessment scores.

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  Measuring the educational environment in health professions studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Diantha Soemantri; Cristian Herrera; Arnoldo Riquelme
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  The Dundee Ready Educational Environment Measure (DREEM)--a generic instrument for measuring students' perceptions of undergraduate health professions curricula.

Authors:  Sue Roff
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 5.  What is the validity evidence for assessments of clinical teaching?

Authors:  Thomas J Beckman; David A Cook; Jayawant N Mandrekar
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Necessary steps in factor analysis: enhancing validation studies of educational instruments. The PHEEM applied to clerks as an example.

Authors:  Johanna Schönrock-Adema; Marjolein Heijne-Penninga; Elisabeth A Van Hell; Janke Cohen-Schotanus
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.650

7.  Can we create an equivalent educational experience on a two campus medical school?

Authors:  Jean McKendree
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Comparing staff and student perceptions of the student experience at a new medical school.

Authors:  Susan Miles; Sam J Leinster
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.650

9.  Time spent on clerkship activities by students in relation to their perceptions of learning environment quality.

Authors:  Elisabeth A van Hell; Jan B M Kuks; Janke Cohen-Schotanus
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 6.251

10.  Towards valid measures of self-directed clinical learning.

Authors:  Tim Dornan; Albert Scherpbier; Henny Boshuizen
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 6.251

View more
  12 in total

1.  Postgraduate training in Ireland: expectations and experience.

Authors:  D Bennett; T Dornan; C Bergin; M Horgan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 1.568

2.  Perceptions of Lecturers, Administrators, and Students About the Workplace as Learning Environment for Undergraduate Medical Students at a National Referral and Teaching Hospital in Uganda.

Authors:  Mike Nantamu Kagawa; Sarah Kiguli; Hannes Steinberg; Mpho Priscilla Jama
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2022-05-26

3.  Students' perceptions of the learning environment in two Nigerian medical schools offering different curricula.

Authors:  Olufunmilola A Ogun; Timothy E Nottidge; Sue Roff
Journal:  Ghana Med J       Date:  2018-09

4.  Clinical assessment of transthoracic echocardiography skills: a generalizability study.

Authors:  Dorte Guldbrand Nielsen; Signe Lichtenstein Jensen; Lotte O'Neill
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 2.463

5.  Adaptation and validation of the instrument Clinical Learning Environment and Supervision for medical students in primary health care.

Authors:  Eva Öhman; Hassan Alinaghizadeh; Päivi Kaila; Håkan Hult; Gunnar H Nilsson; Helena Salminen
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.463

6.  Medical school clinical placements - the optimal method for assessing the clinical educational environment from a graduate entry perspective.

Authors:  Sarah Hyde; Ailish Hannigan; Tim Dornan; Deirdre McGrath
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.463

7.  Development of a brief learning environment measure for use in healthcare professions education: the Healthcare Education Micro Learning Environment Measure (HEMLEM).

Authors:  R Isba; C Rousseva; K Woolf; L Byrne-Davis
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.463

8.  Correlation between early clinical exposure environment, attitudes toward basic medicine, and medical students' basic science learning performance.

Authors:  Kung-Pei Tang; Chien-Yu Chen; Ming-Shun Wu; Tzu-Tao Chen; Bei-Wen Wu; Po-Fang Tsai
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Medical students' reactions to an experience-based learning model of clinical education.

Authors:  Alexandra Hay; Sarah Smithson; Karen Mann; Tim Dornan
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2013-05-03

10.  Differences in clerkship development between public and private Brazilian medical schools: an overview.

Authors:  Mauricio Braz Zanolli; Derly Silva Streit; Dione Tavares Maciel; Evelin Massae Ogata Muraguchi; Milton Arruda Martins; Iolanda Fátima Lopes Calvo Tibério
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-09-21       Impact factor: 2.463

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.