Literature DB >> 22233266

Collection and storage of red blood cells with anticoagulant and additive solution with a physiologic pH.

Patrick Burger1, Herbert Korsten, Arthur J Verhoeven, Dirk de Korte, Robin van Bruggen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A donation of whole blood is most commonly collected in acidic citrate-phosphate-dextrose (CPD) variants with pH 5.2 to 6.2 as anticoagulants. Previously, we have shown that the initial pH after red blood cell (RBC) preparation can have an effect on RBCs during storage. First, we investigated the effect of the pH of the anticoagulant on RBCs. Second, we investigated the possibility of decreasing the pH of our new additive solution (AS) phosphate-adenine-glucose-guanosine-gluconate-mannitol (PAGGGM) from pH 8.2 to 7.4 in combination with an anticoagulant with a physiologic pH. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Whole blood was collected in CPD (pH 5.6) or trisodiumcitrate (TNC; pH 7.4), and leukoreduced units were prepared using saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol as AS. Second, whole blood was collected in TNC (pH 7.4), and leukoreduced units were prepared using PAGGGM (pH 7.4) or PAGGGM (pH 8.2) as AS. During cold storage, several in vitro characteristics were analyzed.
RESULTS: In agreement with our previous findings, the initial pH of whole blood has an effect during storage of RBCs. In the second part we show that there are no differences between PAGGGM (pH 7.4) and PAGGGM (pH 8.2) units when an anticoagulant with a physiologic pH was used.
CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the pH of the anticoagulant used during whole blood collection has an effect during storage of RBCs. When an anticoagulant with a physiologic pH is used during whole blood collection, the pH of PAGGGM can be decreased to physiologic levels, while maintaining adenosine triphosphate and 2,3-diphosphoglycerate levels.
© 2012 American Association of Blood Banks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22233266     DOI: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03472.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  6 in total

Review 1.  Time to revisit red blood cell additive solutions and storage conditions: a role for "omics" analyses.

Authors:  Rosemary L Sparrow
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Prevention of red cell storage lesion: a comparison of five different additive solutions.

Authors:  Johan W Lagerberg; Herbert Korsten; Pieter F Van Der Meer; Dirk De Korte
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Differences in Rat and Human Erythrocytes Following Blood Component Manufacturing: The Effect of Additive Solutions.

Authors:  Luciana da SilveiraCavalcante; Jason P Acker; Jelena L Holovati
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 3.747

4.  Treatment of Whole Blood With Riboflavin and UV Light: Impact on Malaria Parasite Viability and Whole Blood Storage.

Authors:  Shirley Owusu-Ofori; Joseph Kusi; Alex Owusu-Ofori; Graham Freimanis; Christine Olver; Caitlyn R Martinez; Shilo Wilkinson; Janna M Mundt; Shawn D Keil; Raymond P Goodrich; Jean-Pierre Allain
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.454

5.  Erythrocyte concentrates recovered from under-collected whole blood: experimental and clinical results.

Authors:  Wen-Biao Liang; Ming-Hua Guo; En-Yong Fan; Jing-Jing Zhang; Min-Hui Wu; Yan-Chun Liu; Li Cai; Zheng-Gang Li; Bing Huang; Peng Wei; Jun Sun; Yi Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Process improvement by eliminating mixing of whole blood units after an overnight hold prior to component production using the buffy coat method.

Authors:  Cherie Mastronardi; Peter Schubert; Elena Levin; Varsha Bhakta; Qi-Long Yi; Adele Hansen; Tamiko Stewart; Craig Jenkins; Wanda Lefresne; William Sheffield; Jason P Acker
Journal:  J Blood Transfus       Date:  2013-06-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.