Literature DB >> 22232418

Motivated reasoning and public opinion.

April A Strickland1, Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge.   

Abstract

Citizens, especially those who are knowledgeable and care the most about politics, are motivated to defend their beliefs and attitudes in the face of discrepant information. These motivated biases strongly influence the way people think about health care policies and the politicians and parties that propose or attack these contentious policies. Three cognitive mechanisms are identified: a prior belief effect, confirmation bias, and disconfirmation bias. Together, these information processes conspire to produce persistence and polarization of opinion on health care policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22232418     DOI: 10.1215/03616878-1460524

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Polit Policy Law        ISSN: 0361-6878            Impact factor:   2.265


  6 in total

1.  Americans' perceptions of health disparities over the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from three nationally-representative surveys.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Erika Franklin Fowler; Rachel I Vogel; Alexander J Rothman; Marco Yzer; Rebekah H Nagler
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 4.637

2.  Mutual Distrust: Perspectives From Researchers and Policy Makers on the Research to Policy Gap in 2013 and Recommendations for the Future.

Authors:  Sarah E Gollust; Jane W Seymour; Maximilian J Pany; Adeline Goss; Zachary F Meisel; David Grande
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Shifting public engagement: How media coverage of climate change conferences affects climate change audience segments.

Authors:  Anke Wonneberger; Marijn H C Meijers; Andreas R T Schuck
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2019-11-11

4.  Political affiliation moderates subjective interpretations of COVID-19 graphs.

Authors:  Jonathan D Ericson; William S Albert; Ja-Nae Duane
Journal:  Big Data Soc       Date:  2022-03-04

5.  Sequential information processing in persuasion.

Authors:  Roman Linne; Jannis Hildebrandt; Gerd Bohner; Hans-Peter Erb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-09-06

6.  Will E-Cigarette Modified Risk Messages with a Nicotine Warning Polarize Smokers' Beliefs about the Efficacy of Switching Completely to E-Cigarettes in Reducing Smoking-Related Risks?

Authors:  Bo Yang; Juliana L Barbati; Yunjin Choi
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.