BACKGROUND: Anthropometric status can influence gait biomechanics, but there is relatively little published research regarding foot and ankle characteristics in the obese pediatric population. We sought to compare the structural and functional characteristics of the foot and ankle complex in obese and non-obese children. METHODS: Twenty healthy children (ten obese and ten normal weight) were recruited for a cross-sectional research study. Anthropometric parameters were measured to evaluate active ankle dorsiflexion, arch height (arch height index, arch rigidity index ratio, and arch drop), foot alignment (resting calcaneal stance position and forefoot-rearfoot alignment in unloaded and loaded positions), and foot type (malleolar valgus index). Independent t tests determined significant differences between groups for all assessed parameters. Statistical significance was set at P < .0125. RESULTS: Compared with non-obese participants, obese participants had significantly greater arch drop (mean ± SD: 5.10 ± 2.13 mm versus 2.90 ± 1.20 mm; P =.011) and a trend toward lower arch rigidity index ratios (mean ± SD: 0.92 ± 0.03 versus 0.95 ± 0.02; P = .013). In addition, obese participants had significantly less active ankle dorsiflexion at 90° of knee flexion versus non-obese participants (mean ± SD: 19.57 ± 5.17 versus 29.07 ± 3.06; P < .001). No significant differences existed between groups for any other anthropometric measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased active ankle dorsiflexion in the obese group can increase foot contact for a longer period of the stance phase of gait. Obese participants also presented with a more flexible foot when bearing weight.
BACKGROUND: Anthropometric status can influence gait biomechanics, but there is relatively little published research regarding foot and ankle characteristics in the obese pediatric population. We sought to compare the structural and functional characteristics of the foot and ankle complex in obese and non-obesechildren. METHODS: Twenty healthy children (ten obese and ten normal weight) were recruited for a cross-sectional research study. Anthropometric parameters were measured to evaluate active ankle dorsiflexion, arch height (arch height index, arch rigidity index ratio, and arch drop), foot alignment (resting calcaneal stance position and forefoot-rearfoot alignment in unloaded and loaded positions), and foot type (malleolar valgus index). Independent t tests determined significant differences between groups for all assessed parameters. Statistical significance was set at P < .0125. RESULTS: Compared with non-obeseparticipants, obeseparticipants had significantly greater arch drop (mean ± SD: 5.10 ± 2.13 mm versus 2.90 ± 1.20 mm; P =.011) and a trend toward lower arch rigidity index ratios (mean ± SD: 0.92 ± 0.03 versus 0.95 ± 0.02; P = .013). In addition, obeseparticipants had significantly less active ankle dorsiflexion at 90° of knee flexion versus non-obeseparticipants (mean ± SD: 19.57 ± 5.17 versus 29.07 ± 3.06; P < .001). No significant differences existed between groups for any other anthropometric measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The decreased active ankle dorsiflexion in the obese group can increase foot contact for a longer period of the stance phase of gait. Obeseparticipants also presented with a more flexible foot when bearing weight.
Authors: Gabriel M Pagnotti; Amna Haider; Ariel Yang; Kathryn E Cottell; Catherine M Tuppo; Kai-Yu Tong; Aurora D Pryor; Clinton T Rubin; M Ete Chan Journal: Obes Facts Date: 2020-10-20 Impact factor: 3.942
Authors: Keri R Hainsworth; Xue Cheng Liu; Pippa M Simpson; Ann M Swartz; Nina Linneman; Susan T Tran; Gustavo R Medrano; Bryant Mascarenhas; Liyun Zhang; Steven J Weisman Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2018-07-04
Authors: Michał Brzeziński; Zbigniew Czubek; Aleksandra Niedzielska; Marek Jankowski; Tomasz Kobus; Zbigniew Ossowski Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2019-02-18 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Karl B Landorf; Michelle R Kaminski; Shannon E Munteanu; Gerard V Zammit; Hylton B Menz Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-03-19 Impact factor: 4.379