Stephen G Henry1, Susan Eggly. 1. VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. henrstep@umich.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We know little about how much time low-income patients and physicians spend discussing pain during primary care visits. OBJECTIVE: To measure the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions at a primary care clinic serving mostly low-income black patients; to investigate variables associated with these discussions. DESIGN: We measured the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions using video-recorded primary care visits; we used multiple regression to evaluate associations between discussions and patient self-report variables. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 133 patients presenting to a primary care clinic for any reason; 17 family medicine residents. MAIN MEASURES: Independent variables were pain severity, health status, physical function, chief complaint, and whether the patient and physician had met previously. Dependent variables were presence of pain-related discussions and percent of total visit time spent discussing pain. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of visits included pain-related discussions with a mean duration of 5.9 min (34% of total visit time). Increasing pain severity [OR 1.69, 95% CI (1.18, 2.41)] and pain-related chief complaints [OR 4.10, 95% CI (1.39, 12.12)] were positively associated with the probability of discussing pain. When patients discussed pain, they spent 4.5% more [95% CI (0.60, 8.37)] total visit time discussing pain for every one-point increase in pain severity. Better physical function was negatively associated with the probability of discussing pain [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.48, 0.86)], but positively associated with the percent of total visit time spent discussing pain [3% increase; 95% CI (0.32, 5.75)] for every one-point increase in physical function). Patients and physicians who had met previously spent 11% less [95% CI (-21.65, -0.55)] total visit time discussing pain. Pain severity was positively associated with time spent discussing pain only when patients and physicians had not met previously. CONCLUSIONS: Pain-related discussions comprise a substantial proportion of time during primary care visits. Future research should evaluate the relationship between time spent discussing pain and the quality of primary care pain management.
BACKGROUND: We know little about how much time low-income patients and physicians spend discussing pain during primary care visits. OBJECTIVE: To measure the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions at a primary care clinic serving mostly low-income black patients; to investigate variables associated with these discussions. DESIGN: We measured the frequency and duration of pain-related discussions using video-recorded primary care visits; we used multiple regression to evaluate associations between discussions and patient self-report variables. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 133 patients presenting to a primary care clinic for any reason; 17 family medicine residents. MAIN MEASURES: Independent variables were pain severity, health status, physical function, chief complaint, and whether the patient and physician had met previously. Dependent variables were presence of pain-related discussions and percent of total visit time spent discussing pain. KEY RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of visits included pain-related discussions with a mean duration of 5.9 min (34% of total visit time). Increasing pain severity [OR 1.69, 95% CI (1.18, 2.41)] and pain-related chief complaints [OR 4.10, 95% CI (1.39, 12.12)] were positively associated with the probability of discussing pain. When patients discussed pain, they spent 4.5% more [95% CI (0.60, 8.37)] total visit time discussing pain for every one-point increase in pain severity. Better physical function was negatively associated with the probability of discussing pain [OR 0.65, 95% CI (0.48, 0.86)], but positively associated with the percent of total visit time spent discussing pain [3% increase; 95% CI (0.32, 5.75)] for every one-point increase in physical function). Patients and physicians who had met previously spent 11% less [95% CI (-21.65, -0.55)] total visit time discussing pain. Pain severity was positively associated with time spent discussing pain only when patients and physicians had not met previously. CONCLUSIONS:Pain-related discussions comprise a substantial proportion of time during primary care visits. Future research should evaluate the relationship between time spent discussing pain and the quality of primary care pain management.
Authors: Marcia G Ory; Paula J Yuma; Margo-Lea Hurwicz; Crystal Jarvis; Kate L Barron; Tom Tai-Seale; Ming Tai-Seale; Dhaval Patel; David Hackethorn; Rachel Bramson; Richard Street; Mary Ann Cook Journal: Prev Med Date: 2006-08-09 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Marianne S Matthias; Amy L Parpart; Kathryn A Nyland; Monica A Huffman; Dawana L Stubbs; Christy Sargent; Matthew J Bair Journal: Pain Med Date: 2010-11 Impact factor: 3.750
Authors: Terrance L Albrecht; John C Ruckdeschel; Fountain L Ray; Ben J Pethe; Dawn L Riddle; Joan Strohm; Louis A Penner; Michael D Coovert; Gwendolyn Quinn; Christina G Blanchard Journal: Behav Res Methods Date: 2005-02
Authors: Louis A Penner; John F Dovidio; Tessa V West; Samuel L Gaertner; Terrance L Albrecht; Rhonda K Dailey; Tsveti Markova Journal: J Exp Soc Psychol Date: 2010-03-01
Authors: Louis A Penner; John F Dovidio; Donald Edmondson; Rhonda K Dailey; Tsveti Markova; Terrance L Albrecht; Samuel L Gaertner Journal: J Black Psychol Date: 2009-05-01
Authors: Helen Kinsman Hughes; Philip Todd Korthuis; Somnath Saha; Susan Eggly; Victoria Sharp; Jonathan Cohn; Richard Moore; Mary Catherine Beach Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2015-01-03