BACKGROUND: High-Mobility-Group Box 1 (HMGB1) has been established as an important mediator of myocardial inflammation and associated with progression of heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of systemic HMGB1 levels in HF patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an analysis (median follow-up time 2.5 years) of HMGB1 plasma concentration in 154 patients with systolic HF and correlated the results with disease severity and prognosis. HMGB1 in HF patients with severe symptoms (NYHA III/IV; 5.35 ng/ml; interquartile range (IQR) = 3.48-8.42 ng/ml) was significantly elevated compared with that in patients with mild symptoms (NYHA I/II; 3.37 ng/ml, IQR = 2.31-5.22 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) and with controls (3.25 ng/ml, IQR = 3.04-3.67 ng/ml, p < 0.0001). HMGB1 levels correlated with other markers of heart failure indicating an association of HMGB1 with disease severity in HF. In a univariate cox regression model for the combined endpoint of death and heart transplantation, HMGB1 proved to be a predictor at cut-off values based on HMGB1 terciles of either 3.4 or 6.1 ng/ml (p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In a multivariate cox regression model, which included NT-proBNP, creatinine, age, NYHA class, white blood cell count, anemia, and age, HMGB1 remained an independent predictor of the combined endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-5.83, p = 0.037 and HR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.31-4.71, p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that HMGB1 plasma concentration is elevated in HF and correlates with disease severity and that is an independent predictor of the combined endpoint death and heart transplantation in HF patients.
BACKGROUND:High-Mobility-Group Box 1 (HMGB1) has been established as an important mediator of myocardial inflammation and associated with progression of heart failure (HF). The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic value of systemic HMGB1 levels in HF patients with ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted an analysis (median follow-up time 2.5 years) of HMGB1 plasma concentration in 154 patients with systolic HF and correlated the results with disease severity and prognosis. HMGB1 in HF patients with severe symptoms (NYHA III/IV; 5.35 ng/ml; interquartile range (IQR) = 3.48-8.42 ng/ml) was significantly elevated compared with that in patients with mild symptoms (NYHA I/II; 3.37 ng/ml, IQR = 2.31-5.22 ng/ml, p < 0.0001) and with controls (3.25 ng/ml, IQR = 3.04-3.67 ng/ml, p < 0.0001). HMGB1 levels correlated with other markers of heart failure indicating an association of HMGB1 with disease severity in HF. In a univariate cox regression model for the combined endpoint of death and heart transplantation, HMGB1 proved to be a predictor at cut-off values based on HMGB1 terciles of either 3.4 or 6.1 ng/ml (p = 0.001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). In a multivariate cox regression model, which included NT-proBNP, creatinine, age, NYHA class, white blood cell count, anemia, and age, HMGB1 remained an independent predictor of the combined endpoint (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.06-5.83, p = 0.037 and HR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.31-4.71, p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our findings demonstrate that HMGB1 plasma concentration is elevated in HF and correlates with disease severity and that is an independent predictor of the combined endpoint death and heart transplantation in HF patients.
Authors: Juliana Jensen; Li-Ping Ma; Michael L X Fu; David Svaninger; Per-Arne Lundberg; Ola Hammarsten Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2010-03-13 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: M R Cowie; A D Struthers; D A Wood; A J Coats; S G Thompson; P A Poole-Wilson; G C Sutton Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-11-08 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Tom D J Smilde; Kevin Damman; Pim van der Harst; Gerjan Navis; B Daan Westenbrink; Adriaan A Voors; Frans Boomsma; Dirk J van Veldhuisen; Hans L Hillege Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Huan Yang; Mahendar Ochani; Jianhua Li; Xiaoling Qiang; Mahira Tanovic; Helena E Harris; Srinivas M Susarla; Luis Ulloa; Hong Wang; Robert DiRaimo; Christopher J Czura; Haichao Wang; Jesse Roth; H Shaw Warren; Mitchell P Fink; Matthew J Fenton; Ulf Andersson; Kevin J Tracey Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-12-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Christine S Zuern; Britta Walker; Martina Sauter; Malte Schaub; Madhumita Chatterjee; Karin Mueller; Dominik Rath; Sebastian Vogel; Roland Tegtmeyer; Peter Seizer; Tobias Geisler; Reinhard Kandolf; Florian Lang; Karin Klingel; Meinrad Gawaz; Oliver Borst Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Anna Bangert; Martin Andrassy; Anna-Maria Müller; Mariella Bockstahler; Andrea Fischer; Christian H Volz; Christoph Leib; Stefan Göser; Sevil Korkmaz-Icöz; Stefan Zittrich; Andreas Jungmann; Felix Lasitschka; Gabriele Pfitzer; Oliver J Müller; Hugo A Katus; Ziya Kaya Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-12-29 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Petri O Tuomainen; Jarkko Magga; Pekka Timonen; Kati Miettinen; Minna Kurttila; Esko Vanninen; Tomi Laitinen; Kirsi Timonen; Kari Punnonen; Ilkka Parviainen; Ari Uusaro; Olli Vuolteenaho; Matti Kivikko; Keijo Peuhkurinen Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2013-03-17 Impact factor: 5.460