Literature DB >> 22231636

Quantifying agonist activity at G protein-coupled receptors.

Frederick J Ehlert1, Hinako Suga, Michael T Griffin.   

Abstract

When an agonist activates a population of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), it elicits a signaling pathway that culminates in the response of the cell or tissue. This process can be analyzed at the level of a single receptor, a population of receptors, or a downstream response. Here we describe how to analyze the downstream response to obtain an estimate of the agonist affinity constant for the active state of single receptors. Receptors behave as quantal switches that alternate between active and inactive states (Figure 1). The active state interacts with specific G proteins or other signaling partners. In the absence of ligands, the inactive state predominates. The binding of agonist increases the probability that the receptor will switch into the active state because its affinity constant for the active state (K(b)) is much greater than that for the inactive state (K(a)). The summation of the random outputs of all of the receptors in the population yields a constant level of receptor activation in time. The reciprocal of the concentration of agonist eliciting half-maximal receptor activation is equivalent to the observed affinity constant (K(obs)), and the fraction of agonist-receptor complexes in the active state is defined as efficacy (ε) (Figure 2). Methods for analyzing the downstream responses of GPCRs have been developed that enable the estimation of the K(obs) and relative efficacy of an agonist. In this report, we show how to modify this analysis to estimate the agonist K(b) value relative to that of another agonist. For assays that exhibit constitutive activity, we show how to estimate K(b) in absolute units of M(-1). Our method of analyzing agonist concentration-response curves consists of global nonlinear regression using the operational model. We describe a procedure using the software application, Prism (GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA). The analysis yields an estimate of the product of K(obs) and a parameter proportional to efficacy (τ). The estimate of τK(obs) of one agonist, divided by that of another, is a relative measure of K(b) (RA(i)). For any receptor exhibiting constitutive activity, it is possible to estimate a parameter proportional to the efficacy of the free receptor complex (τ(sys)). In this case, the K(b) value of an agonist is equivalent to τK(obs)/τ(sys). Our method is useful for determining the selectivity of an agonist for receptor subtypes and for quantifying agonist-receptor signaling through different G proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22231636      PMCID: PMC3369663          DOI: 10.3791/3179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  10 in total

1.  A simple method for estimation of agonist activity at receptor subtypes: comparison of native and cloned M3 muscarinic receptors in guinea pig ileum and transfected cells.

Authors:  F J Ehlert; M T Griffin; G W Sawyer; R Bailon
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.030

2.  A modification of receptor theory.

Authors:  R P STEPHENSON
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol Chemother       Date:  1956-12

3.  In vitro isolated tissue functional muscarinic receptor assays.

Authors:  M Teresa Pulido-Rios; Tod Steinfeld; Scott Armstrong; Nikki Watson; Agnes Choppin; Richard Eglen; Sharath S Hegde
Journal:  Curr Protoc Pharmacol       Date:  2010-03

4.  Analysis of agonism and inverse agonism in functional assays with constitutive activity: estimation of orthosteric ligand affinity constants for active and inactive receptor states.

Authors:  Frederick J Ehlert; Hinako Suga; Michael T Griffin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-05-16       Impact factor: 4.030

5.  Pharmacology of muscarinic receptor subtypes constitutively activated by G proteins.

Authors:  E S Burstein; T A Spalding; M R Brann
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.436

6.  Operational models of pharmacological agonism.

Authors:  J W Black; P Leff
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1983-12-22

7.  Estimation of relative microscopic affinity constants of agonists for the active state of the receptor in functional studies on M2 and M3 muscarinic receptors.

Authors:  John A Tran; Alexander Chang; Minoru Matsui; Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.436

8.  Lithium amplifies agonist-dependent phosphatidylinositol responses in brain and salivary glands.

Authors:  M J Berridge; C P Downes; M R Hanley
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1982-09-15       Impact factor: 3.857

9.  Estimation of agonist activity at G protein-coupled receptors: analysis of M2 muscarinic receptor signaling through Gi/o,Gs, and G15.

Authors:  Michael T Griffin; Katherine W Figueroa; Sarah Liller; Frederick J Ehlert
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Accumulation of adenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate in clonal glial cells: labeling of intracellular adenine nucleotides with radioactive adenine.

Authors:  J Schultz; B Hamprecht; J W Daly
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total
  3 in total

1.  Mapping Cannabinoid 1 Receptor Allosteric Site(s): Critical Molecular Determinant and Signaling Profile of GAT100, a Novel, Potent, and Irreversibly Binding Probe.

Authors:  Robert B Laprairie; Abhijit R Kulkarni; Pushkar M Kulkarni; Dow P Hurst; Diane Lynch; Patricia H Reggio; David R Janero; Roger G Pertwee; Lesley A Stevenson; Melanie E M Kelly; Eileen M Denovan-Wright; Ganesh A Thakur
Journal:  ACS Chem Neurosci       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 4.418

2.  Intrinsic relative activities of κ opioid agonists in activating Gα proteins and internalizing receptor: Differences between human and mouse receptors.

Authors:  Kelly M DiMattio; Frederick J Ehlert; Lee-Yuan Liu-Chen
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-06-06       Impact factor: 4.432

3.  Estimation of ligand affinity constants for receptor states in functional studies involving the allosteric modulation of G protein-coupled receptors: implications for ligand bias.

Authors:  Frederick J Ehlert; Michael T Griffin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods       Date:  2014-01-13       Impact factor: 1.950

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.