M Niyazi1, S B Schwarz, B Suchorska, C Belka. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Ludwig-Maximilian-University Munich, Marchioninistrasse 15, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective analysis in 43 consecutive elderly patients with glioblastoma who either underwent radiotherapy (RT) or radiotherapy plus concomitant temozolomide (TMZ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients (≥ 70 years of age, median age 75.8 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70 were treated with RT alone (median 60 Gy in 2 Gy single fractions) or RT plus TMZ at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) per day. The two groups were well-balanced; univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to identify relevant prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median overall survival (mOS) of the entire patient cohort was 264 days (8.8 months) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 192 days (6.4 months). The factors age, sex, previous surgery, KPS, and concomitant use of TMZ had no significant influence on OS/PFS; multivariate analysis was performed to obtain adjusted hazard ratios. TMZ use resulted in a trend toward poorer overall survival when applied concomitantly (314 days compared to 192 days within the TMZ group, p = 0.106). The subgroup analysis revealed that TMZ use resulted in significantly worse survival rates in patients with KPS70 (p = 0.027), but for patients with KPS80 this difference was not detectable. CONCLUSION: TMZ should only be used carefully in elderly patients with unfavorable KPS. In this patient cohort, radiotherapy alone is a reasonable option. Standard RT plus concomitant TMZ may be an advantageous treatment option for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who present with good prognostic factors.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The optimal treatment for elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial. We conducted a retrospective analysis in 43 consecutive elderly patients with glioblastoma who either underwent radiotherapy (RT) or radiotherapy plus concomitant temozolomide (TMZ). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 43 patients (≥ 70 years of age, median age 75.8 years) with newly diagnosed glioblastoma and a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) ≥ 70 were treated with RT alone (median 60 Gy in 2 Gy single fractions) or RT plus TMZ at a dose of 75 mg/m(2) per day. The two groups were well-balanced; univariate (log-rank test) and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to identify relevant prognostic factors. RESULTS: The median overall survival (mOS) of the entire patient cohort was 264 days (8.8 months) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 192 days (6.4 months). The factors age, sex, previous surgery, KPS, and concomitant use of TMZ had no significant influence on OS/PFS; multivariate analysis was performed to obtain adjusted hazard ratios. TMZ use resulted in a trend toward poorer overall survival when applied concomitantly (314 days compared to 192 days within the TMZ group, p = 0.106). The subgroup analysis revealed that TMZ use resulted in significantly worse survival rates in patients with KPS70 (p = 0.027), but for patients with KPS80 this difference was not detectable. CONCLUSION:TMZ should only be used carefully in elderly patients with unfavorable KPS. In this patient cohort, radiotherapy alone is a reasonable option. Standard RT plus concomitant TMZ may be an advantageous treatment option for elderly patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who present with good prognostic factors.
Authors: W Roa; P M A Brasher; G Bauman; M Anthes; E Bruera; A Chan; B Fisher; D Fulton; S Gulavita; C Hao; S Husain; A Murtha; K Petruk; D Stewart; P Tai; R Urtasun; J G Cairncross; P Forsyth Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2004-03-29 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: W J Curran; C B Scott; J Horton; J S Nelson; A S Weinstein; A J Fischbach; C H Chang; M Rotman; S O Asbell; R E Krisch Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1993-05-05 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Stephanie E Combs; Johanna Wagner; Marc Bischof; Thomas Welzel; Florian Wagner; Jürgen Debus; Daniela Schulz-Ertner Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-10-29 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Randall J Kimple; Sarah Grabowski; Michael Papez; Frances Collichio; Matthew G Ewend; David E Morris Journal: Am J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-06 Impact factor: 2.339
Authors: G Minniti; V De Sanctis; R Muni; F Filippone; A Bozzao; M Valeriani; M F Osti; U De Paula; G Lanzetta; V Tombolini; R Maurizi Enrici Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2008-02-05 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: L Fariselli; V Pinzi; I Milanesi; A Silvani; M Marchetti; M Farinotti; A Salmaggi Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2013-04-28 Impact factor: 3.621