Literature DB >> 22231536

Influence of temperature management on neurocognitive function in biological aortic valve replacement. A prospective randomized trial.

R Fakin1, D Zimpfer, G H Sodeck, A Rajek, B Mora, J Dumfarth, M Grimm, M Czerny.   

Abstract

AIM: Aim of this study was to elucidate if postoperative neurocognitive function after biological aortic valve replacement (AVR) can be influenced by temperature management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB).
METHODS: In this prospective randomized study, we measured the effect of mild hypothermic (32 °C, N.=30) vs. normothermic (37 °C, N.=30) CPB on neurocognitive function. All patients underwent elective isolated biological AVR (mean age 67 ± 8 years, mean additional EuroSCORE 5.6 ± 2.4). Neurocognitive function was objectively measured by means of objective P300 auditory-evoked potentials before surgery, one week and four months after surgery. Clinical data and outcome were monitored.
RESULTS: P300 evoked potentials were comparable between patients operated with mild hypothermic (370 ± 30 ms) and normothermic CPB (373 ± 32 ms) before surgery (P=0.85). P300 peak latencies were prolonged (=impaired) in patients operated with normothermic (402 ± 29, P<0.0001) as well as with mild hypothermic CPB (405 ± 30 ms, P<0.0001) one week after surgery. Even four months after surgery, still impairment of P300 peak latencies could be documented in either patients operated with normothermic (394 ± 28 ms) and mild hypothermic CPB (400 ± 33 ms,) in repeated measures analysis of variance (P=0.042). Group comparison revealed no difference between patients operated with normothermic and mild hypothermic CPB at one week (P=0.54) and four months (P=0.67) after surgery. Clinical data as well as postoperative adverse events were comparable between the two groups.
CONCLUSION: Normothermic temperature management during CPB is non-inferior to hypothermic in means of neuroprotection. Since patients after biological aortic valve replacement show a subclinical but measurable cognitive deficit up to four months after surgery, other factors have to be addressed to add further benefit to the extremely good results of open biological AVR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22231536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)        ISSN: 0021-9509            Impact factor:   1.888


  3 in total

Review 1.  Current approach to diagnosis and treatment of delirium after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Adam S Evans; Menachem M Weiner; Rakesh C Arora; Insung Chung; Ranjit Deshpande; Robin Varghese; John Augoustides; Harish Ramakrishna
Journal:  Ann Card Anaesth       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

2.  Mild hypothermia versus normothermia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Valentino Bianco; Arman Kilic; Edgar Aranda-Michel; Courtenay Dunn-Lewis; Derek Serna-Gallegos; Shangzhen Chen; Forozan Navid; Ibrahim Sultan
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-06-17

Review 3.  Therapeutic Hypothermia and the Risk of Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Chih-Hung Wang; Nai-Chuan Chen; Min-Shan Tsai; Ping-Hsun Yu; An-Yi Wang; Wei-Tien Chang; Chien-Hua Huang; Wen-Jone Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.817

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.