Literature DB >> 22231295

Thulium:YAG VapoEnucleation of the prostate in large glands: a prospective comparison using 70- and 120-W 2-µm lasers.

Christopher Netsch1, Thorsten Bach, Thomas R W Herrmann, Andreas J Gross.   

Abstract

This study compared the efficacy of 70- and 120-w 2-µm thulium:YAG VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for patients with benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). A prospective analysis of 84 patients with symptomatic BPO and prostatic enlargement (≥60 ml) who underwent either 70-w (n=44) or 120-w ThuVEP (n=40) non-randomly was carried out. Patient demographics and perioperative and 12-month follow-up data were analysed. The mean prostate volume was 79.90±27.49 ml in patients who had received 70-w ThuVEP, which was less than in those who had received 120-w ThuVEP (88.53±25.10; P=0.033). The mean enucleation (resected weight/laser time, 2.16±1.21 g min(-1) vs. 1.23±0.60 g min(-1); P=0.013), operation efficiency (resected weight/total operation time, 0.76±0.35 g min(-1) vs. 0.42±0.27 g min(-1); P=0.000) and percentage of resected tissue (66.93%±22.79% vs. 45.41%±23.33%; P=0.000) were higher with 120-w treatment compared to 70-w ThuVEP. One patient (1.2% of total patients) (in the 120-w group) required a blood transfusion postoperatively. Sixty-one patients (73%) were available for review at the 12-month follow-up time point. The quality of life (QoL), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum urinary flow rate (Q(max)), postvoiding residual urine (PVR) and prostate volume improved significantly after treatment (P≤0.035) and were not significantly different between those treated with the different devices (70- and 120-w). The median prostate volume reduction was 81.70% and 82.19% with 70- and 120-w ThuVEP, respectively. The incidence of complications was low and did not differ between groups treated with the different devices. Two patients (2.4%) (one per group) had a bladder neck contracture at the follow-up. ThuVEP is a safe and efficacious procedure for the treatment of symptomatic BPO. The incidence of complications was low with both devices. The 120-w thulium:YAG device enhances the effectiveness of ThuVEP with regard to the percentage of resected tissue and the enucleation/operation efficiency.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22231295      PMCID: PMC3735080          DOI: 10.1038/aja.2011.167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asian J Androl        ISSN: 1008-682X            Impact factor:   3.285


  29 in total

1.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for men with urinary retention.

Authors:  Matthew D Peterson; Brian R Matlaga; Samuel C Kim; Ramsay L Kuo; Trevor M Soergel; Stephanie L Watkins; James E Lingeman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for prostates of >125 mL.

Authors:  Brian R Matlaga; Samuel C Kim; Ramsay L Kuo; Stephanie L Watkins; James E Lingeman
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.588

3.  Retropubic transvesical prostatectomy for significant prostatic enlargement must remain a standard part of urology training.

Authors:  Christoph Adam; Alfons Hofstetter; Jörg Deubner; Dirk Zaak; Rolf Weitkunat; Michael Seitz; Peter Schneede
Journal:  Scand J Urol Nephrol       Date:  2004

4.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: a size-independent new "gold standard".

Authors:  Ehab A Elzayat; Enmar I Habib; Mostafa M Elhilali
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  A randomised trial comparing holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection in the treatment of prostates larger than 40 grams: results at 2 years.

Authors:  Liam C Wilson; Peter J Gilling; Andrew Williams; Katie M Kennett; Chris M Frampton; Andre M Westenberg; Mark R Fraundorfer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

6.  Evaluation of fluid absorption during holmium laser enucleation of prostate by breath ethanol technique.

Authors:  Hemendra N Shah; Vikram Kausik; Sunil Hegde; Jignesh N Shah; Manish B Bansal
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus open prostatectomy for prostates >70 g: 24-month follow-up.

Authors:  Richard Naspro; Nazareno Suardi; Andrea Salonia; Vincenzo Scattoni; Giorgio Guazzoni; Renzo Colombo; Andrea Cestari; Alberto Briganti; Bruno Mazzoccoli; Patrizio Rigatti; Francesco Montorsi
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP): the endourologic alternative to open prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ehab A Elzayat; Mostafa M Elhilali
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2005-11-02       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  Transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral electrocautery resection of the prostate: a randomized prospective trial in 200 patients.

Authors:  Rainer M Kuntz; Sascha Ahyai; Karin Lehrich; Amr Fayad
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 7.450

10.  Holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP): the Methodist Hospital experience with greater than 75 gram enucleations.

Authors:  Ramsay L Kuo; Samuel C Kim; James E Lingeman; Ryan F Paterson; Stephanie L Watkins; Garrick R Simmons; Ronald E Steele
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  13 in total

1.  Safety and efficiency of thulium laser prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in large prostates.

Authors:  Hai-bin Wei; Jian Zhuo; Xiao-wen Sun; Kun Pang; Yi Shao; Sheng-jie Liang; Di Cui; Fu-jun Zhao; Jun-jie Yu; Shu-jie Xia
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  Benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical scoring (BPHSS): an novel scoring system for the perioperative outcomes of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate.

Authors:  Huan Xu; Zhikang Cai; Yanbo Chen; Meng Gu; Qi Chen; Zhong Wang
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 3.  Nomenclature in thulium laser treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: it's time to pull the rabbit out of the hat.

Authors:  Serena Maruccia; Irene Fulgheri; Emanuele Montanari; Stefano Casellato; Luca Boeri
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Thulium vapoenucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP) for prostates larger than 85 ml: long-term durability of the procedure.

Authors:  Benedikt Becker; Ann Kathrin Orywal; Andreas J Gross; Christopher Netsch
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 3.161

5.  Thulium laser resection versus plasmakinetic resection of prostates larger than 80 ml.

Authors:  Haibin Wei; Yi Shao; Feng Sun; Xiaowen Sun; Jian Zhuo; Fujun Zhao; Bangmin Han; Juntao Jiang; Huirong Chen; Shujie Xia
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Update on the current evidence for Tm:YAG vapoenucleation of the prostate 2014.

Authors:  C Netsch; T Bach; T R W Herrmann; A J Gross
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 7.  Which laser works best for benign prostatic hyperplasia?

Authors:  Arman Adam Kahokehr; Peter J Gilling
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  A prospective, randomized comparison of a 1940 nm and a 2013 nm thulium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser device for Thulium VapoEnucleation of the prostate (ThuVEP): First results.

Authors:  Christian Tiburtius; Andreas J Gross; Christopher Netsch
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

9.  Best laser for prostatectomy in the year 2013.

Authors:  Pankaj N Maheshwari; Nitin Joshi; Reeta P Maheshwari
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2013-07

Review 10.  Two-micron (Thulium) Laser Prostatectomy: An Effective Method for BPH Treatment.

Authors:  Qi Jiang; Shujie Xia
Journal:  Curr Bladder Dysfunct Rep       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.