PURPOSE: Glioma stem cells (GSC) are a critical therapeutic target of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effects of a G-quadruplex ligand, telomestatin, were evaluated using patient-derived GSCs, non-stem tumor cells (non-GSC), and normal fetal neural precursors in vitro and in vivo. The molecular targets of telomestatin were determined by immunofluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) and cDNA microarray. The data were then validated by in vitro and in vivo functional assays, as well as by immunohistochemistry against 90 clinical samples. RESULTS: Telomestatin impaired the maintenance of GSC stem cell state by inducing apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. The migration potential of GSCs was also impaired by telomestatin treatment. In contrast, both normal neural precursors and non-GSCs were relatively resistant to telomestatin. Treatment of GSC-derived mouse intracranial tumors reduced tumor sizes in vivo without a noticeable cell death in normal brains. iFISH revealed both telomeric and non-telomeric DNA damage by telomestatin in GSCs but not in non-GSCs. cDNA microarray identified a proto-oncogene, c-Myb, as a novel molecular target of telomestatin in GSCs, and pharmacodynamic analysis in telomestatin-treated tumor-bearing mouse brains showed a reduction of c-Myb in tumors in vivo. Knockdown of c-Myb phenocopied telomestatin-treated GSCs both in vitro and in vivo, and restoring c-Myb by overexpression partially rescued the phenotype. Finally, c-Myb expression was markedly elevated in surgical specimens of GBMs compared with normal tissues. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that telomestatin potently eradicates GSCs through telomere disruption and c-Myb inhibition, and this study suggests a novel GSC-directed therapeutic strategy for GBMs.
PURPOSE:Glioma stem cells (GSC) are a critical therapeutic target of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The effects of a G-quadruplex ligand, telomestatin, were evaluated using patient-derived GSCs, non-stem tumor cells (non-GSC), and normal fetal neural precursors in vitro and in vivo. The molecular targets of telomestatin were determined by immunofluorescence in situ hybridization (iFISH) and cDNA microarray. The data were then validated by in vitro and in vivo functional assays, as well as by immunohistochemistry against 90 clinical samples. RESULTS:Telomestatin impaired the maintenance of GSC stem cell state by inducing apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. The migration potential of GSCs was also impaired by telomestatin treatment. In contrast, both normal neural precursors and non-GSCs were relatively resistant to telomestatin. Treatment of GSC-derived mouseintracranial tumors reduced tumor sizes in vivo without a noticeable cell death in normal brains. iFISH revealed both telomeric and non-telomeric DNA damage by telomestatin in GSCs but not in non-GSCs. cDNA microarray identified a proto-oncogene, c-Myb, as a novel molecular target of telomestatin in GSCs, and pharmacodynamic analysis in telomestatin-treated tumor-bearing mouse brains showed a reduction of c-Myb in tumors in vivo. Knockdown of c-Myb phenocopied telomestatin-treated GSCs both in vitro and in vivo, and restoring c-Myb by overexpression partially rescued the phenotype. Finally, c-Myb expression was markedly elevated in surgical specimens of GBMs compared with normal tissues. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that telomestatin potently eradicates GSCs through telomere disruption and c-Myb inhibition, and this study suggests a novel GSC-directed therapeutic strategy for GBMs.
Authors: Fabrizio d'Adda di Fagagna; Philip M Reaper; Lorena Clay-Farrace; Heike Fiegler; Philippa Carr; Thomas Von Zglinicki; Gabriele Saretzki; Nigel P Carter; Stephen P Jackson Journal: Nature Date: 2003-11-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Anna V Molofsky; Ricardo Pardal; Toshihide Iwashita; In-Kyung Park; Michael F Clarke; Sean J Morrison Journal: Nature Date: 2003-10-22 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Koppany Visnyei; Hideyuki Onodera; Robert Damoiseaux; Kuniyasu Saigusa; Syuzanna Petrosyan; David De Vries; Denise Ferrari; Jonathan Saxe; Eduard H Panosyan; Michael Masterman-Smith; Jack Mottahedeh; Kenneth A Bradley; Jing Huang; Chiara Sabatti; Ichiro Nakano; Harley I Kornblum Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2011-08-22 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Masood A Shammas; Robert J Shmookler Reis; Cheng Li; Hemanta Koley; Laurence H Hurley; Kenneth C Anderson; Nikhil C Munshi Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-01-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Houman D Hemmati; Ichiro Nakano; Jorge A Lazareff; Michael Masterman-Smith; Daniel H Geschwind; Marianne Bronner-Fraser; Harley I Kornblum Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2003-11-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Sheila K Singh; Ian D Clarke; Mizuhiko Terasaki; Victoria E Bonn; Cynthia Hawkins; Jeremy Squire; Peter B Dirks Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2003-09-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Ping Mao; Kaushal Joshi; Jianfeng Li; Sung-Hak Kim; Peipei Li; Lucas Santana-Santos; Soumya Luthra; Uma R Chandran; Panayiotis V Benos; Luke Smith; Maode Wang; Bo Hu; Shi-Yuan Cheng; Robert W Sobol; Ichiro Nakano Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-05-06 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Justin D Lathia; Meizhang Li; Peter E Hall; Joseph Gallagher; James S Hale; Qiulian Wu; Monica Venere; Emily Levy; M R Sandhya Rani; Ping Huang; Eunnyung Bae; Julia Selfridge; Lin Cheng; Hacer Guvenc; Roger E McLendon; Ichiro Nakano; Andrew E Sloan; Heidi S Phillips; Albert Lai; Candece L Gladson; Markus Bredel; Shideng Bao; Anita B Hjelmeland; Jeremy N Rich Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 10.422