Literature DB >> 22230648

Rivastigmine reduces "Likely to use methamphetamine" in methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.

R De La Garza1, T F Newton, C N Haile, J H Yoon, C S Nerumalla, J J Mahoney, A Aziziyeh.   

Abstract

We previously reported that treatment with the cholinesterase inhibitor rivastigmine (3mg, PO for 5days) significantly attenuated "Desire for METH". Given that higher dosages of rivastigmine produce greater increases in synaptic ACh, we predicted that 6mg should have more pronounced effects on craving and other subjective measures. In the current study, we sought to characterize the effects of short-term exposure to rivastigmine (0, 3 or 6mg) on the subjective and reinforcing effects produced by administration of methamphetamine (METH) in non-treatment-seeking, METH-dependent volunteers. This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Participants received METH on day 1, and were then randomized to placebo or rivastigmine on day 2 in the morning and treatment continued through day 8. METH dosing was repeated on day 6. The data indicate that METH (15 and 30mg), but not saline, increased several positive subjective effects, including "Any Drug Effect", "High", "Stimulated", "Desire METH", and "Likely to Use METH" (all p's<0.0001). In addition, during self-administration sessions, participants were significantly more likely to choose METH over saline (p<0.0001). Evaluating outcomes as peak effects, there was a trend for rivastigmine to reduce "Desire METH" (p=0.27), and rivastigmine significantly attenuated "Likely to Use METH" (p=0.01). These effects were most prominent for rivastigmine 6mg when participants were exposed to the low dose (15mg, IV), but not high dose (30mg, IV), of METH. The self-administration data reveal that rivastigmine did not alter total choices for METH (5mg, IV/choice). Overall, the results indicate some efficacy for rivastigmine in attenuating key subjective effects produced by METH, though additional research using higher doses and longer treatment periods is likely needed. These data extend previous findings and indicate that cholinesterase inhibitors, and other drugs that target acetylcholine systems, warrant continued consideration as treatments for METH dependence. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22230648      PMCID: PMC3877939          DOI: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2011.12.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0278-5846            Impact factor:   5.067


  29 in total

Review 1.  The reinstatement model of drug relapse: history, methodology and major findings.

Authors:  Yavin Shaham; Uri Shalev; Lin Lu; Harriet de Wit; Jane Stewart
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2002-10-26       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Pharmacogenetic treatments for drug addiction: cocaine, amphetamine and methamphetamine.

Authors:  Colin N Haile; Thomas R Kosten; Therese A Kosten
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.829

3.  The influence of cocaine self-administration on in vivo dopamine and acetylcholine neurotransmission in rat caudate-putamen.

Authors:  Y L Hurd; F Weiss; G Koob; U Ungerstedt
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1990-02-05       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Altered neural cholinergic receptor systems in cocaine-addicted subjects.

Authors:  Bryon Adinoff; Michael D Devous; Mark J Williams; Susan E Best; Thomas S Harris; Abu Minhajuddin; Tanya Zielinski; Munro Cullum
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-03-10       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  Brain vesicular acetylcholine transporter in human users of drugs of abuse.

Authors:  Deborah Siegal; Jeffrey Erickson; Helene Varoqui; Lee Ang; Kathryn S Kalasinsky; Frank J Peretti; Sally S Aiken; Dennis J Wickham; Stephen J Kish
Journal:  Synapse       Date:  2004-06-15       Impact factor: 2.562

Review 6.  Pharmacotherapy of methamphetamine addiction: an update.

Authors:  Ahmed Elkashef; Frank Vocci; Glen Hanson; Jason White; Wendy Wickes; Jari Tiihonen
Journal:  Subst Abus       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.716

Review 7.  Approaches to the development of medications for the treatment of methamphetamine dependence.

Authors:  Frank J Vocci; Nathan M Appel
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 6.526

Review 8.  The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10.

Authors:  D V Sheehan; Y Lecrubier; K H Sheehan; P Amorim; J Janavs; E Weiller; T Hergueta; R Baker; G C Dunbar
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 4.384

9.  Evaluation of the cardiovascular and subjective effects of rivastigmine in combination with methamphetamine in methamphetamine-dependent human volunteers.

Authors:  Richard De La Garza; Steve Shoptaw; Thomas F Newton
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 5.176

10.  The search for medications to treat stimulant dependence.

Authors:  Kyle M Kampman
Journal:  Addict Sci Clin Pract       Date:  2008-06
View more
  16 in total

1.  Acute and chronic effects of the M1/M4-preferring muscarinic agonist xanomeline on cocaine vs. food choice in rats.

Authors:  Morgane Thomsen; Brian S Fulton; S Barak Caine
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 2.  Methamphetamine: an update on epidemiology, pharmacology, clinical phenomenology, and treatment literature.

Authors:  Kelly E Courtney; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 4.492

3.  Safety and efficacy of varenicline to reduce positive subjective effects produced by methamphetamine in methamphetamine-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  Christopher D Verrico; James J Mahoney; Daisy G Y Thompson-Lake; Ryan S Bennett; Thomas F Newton; Richard De La Garza
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.176

4.  Naltrexone and bupropion, alone or combined, do not alter the reinforcing effects of intranasal methamphetamine.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Erika Pike; Lon R Hays; Paul E Glaser; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2014-11-29       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 5.  The neurobiological mechanisms of physical exercise in methamphetamine addiction.

Authors:  António Pedro Delgado Morais; Inês Roque Pita; Carlos Alberto Fontes-Ribeiro; Frederico Costa Pereira
Journal:  CNS Neurosci Ther       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.243

6.  Preliminary findings of the effects of rivastigmine, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, on working memory in cocaine-dependent volunteers.

Authors:  James J Mahoney; Ari D Kalechstein; Christopher D Verrico; Nicholas M Arnoudse; Benjamin A Shapiro; Richard De La Garza
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 5.067

7.  The effects of varenicline on methamphetamine self-administration and drug-primed reinstatement in female rats.

Authors:  Steven T Pittenger; Scott T Barrett; Shinnyi Chou; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The effects of varenicline on methamphetamine self-administration and drug-primed reinstatement in male rats.

Authors:  Steven T Pittenger; Scott T Barrett; Shinnyi Chou; Rick A Bevins
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 9.  Pharmacotherapy for stimulant-related disorders.

Authors:  Colin N Haile; Thomas R Kosten
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 10.  Cognitive Function as a Transdiagnostic Treatment Target in Stimulant Use Disorders.

Authors:  Mehmet Sofuoglu; Elise E DeVito; Andrew J Waters; Kathleen M Carroll
Journal:  J Dual Diagn       Date:  2016
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.