| Literature DB >> 22230558 |
Toshinari Aoki1, Tsueko Abe, Eiji Yamada, Takayuki Matsuto, Masahiko Okada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We analyzed the causal relationship between LDL susceptibility to oxidation and the development of new carotid artery atherosclerosis over a period of 5 years. We previously described the determinants related to a risk of cardiovascular changes determined in a Japanese population participating in the Niigata Study, which is an ongoing epidemiological investigation of the prevention of cardiovascular diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22230558 PMCID: PMC3324386 DOI: 10.1186/1476-511X-11-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Lipids Health Dis ISSN: 1476-511X Impact factor: 3.876
Figure 1SDS-PAGE of trypsinized LDL samples. Macroglobulin α2, albumin, fibrinogen β chain precursor and haptoglobin precursor comprised four major bands identified by sequencing. Neither photometric nor electrophoretic O/N significantly differed between native and trypsinized LDLs.
Baseline characteristics of 394 participants in 1996 - 1997
| Characteristic | IMT in 2001-2002 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤ 0.7 mm | ≥ 0.8 mm | ||
| n | 241 | 153 | |
| Age | 54.8 | 57.9 | 0.001 |
| Sex (male/female) (n) | 98/143 | 71/82 | 0.262 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 2.92 (0.76)a | 3.07 (0.73) | 0.068 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.46 (0.37) | 1.46 (0.44) | 0.975 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.11 (0.71) | 1.20 (0.69) | 0.223 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 5.27 (0.66) | 5.44 (0.92) | 0.035 |
| HbA1c (%) | 5.01 (0.6) | 5.16 (0.6) | 0.012 |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 29.4 (17) | 31.1 (32) | 0.492 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 125 (19) | 126 (19) | 0.401 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 77 (10) | 77 (9) | 0.512 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 22.6 (2.7) | 22.9 (2.7) | 0.298 |
| Photometric O/N | 1.90 (0.31) | 1.95 (0.29) | 0.156 |
| Electrophoretic O/N | 2.38 (0.29) | 2.37 (0.25) | 0.597 |
aMean (standard deviation).
Multivariable odds ratios of risk factors at baseline for future increase in IMT
| Characteristica | Age-adjusted modelb | Multivariate modelc | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI)d | OR (95% CI) | |||
| Age | 1.035 (1.009 - 1.062) | 0.009 | ||
| Sex (male/female) (n) | 0.744 (0.491 - 1.129) | 0.165 | 0.732 (0.454 - 1.179) | 0.199 |
| LDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.005 (0.998 - 1.012) | 0.147 | 1.006 (0.998 - 1.014) | 0.144 |
| HDL cholesterol (mmol/L) | 1.000 (0.987 - 1.013) | 0.998 | 1.010 (0.994 - 1.026) | 0.234 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 1.002 (0.998 - 1.005) | 0.371 | 1.001 (0.997 - 1.005) | 0.670 |
| Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) | 1.012 (0.996 - 1.027) | 0.137 | 1.001 (0.983 - 1.021) | 0.877 |
| HbA1c (%) | 1.440 (0.960 - 2.160) | 0.078 | 1.421 (0.878 - 2.298) | 0.153 |
| Fasting insulin (pmol/L) | 1.017 (0.996 - 1.070) | 0.531 | 1.013 (0.958 - 1.071) | 0.646 |
| Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 1.000 (0.989 - 1.011) | 0.985 | 0.995 (0.979 - 1.012) | 0.589 |
| Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) | 1.006 (0.985 - 1.027) | 0.596 | 1.009 (0.978 - 1.041) | 0.574 |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 1.035 (0.959 - 1.119) | 0.376 | 1.026 (0.937 - 1.123) | 0.584 |
| Photometric O/N | 1.919 (0.959 - 3.838) | 0.065 | 1.943 (0.931 - 4.056) | 0.077 |
| Electrophoretic O/N | 1.031 (0.479 - 2.220) | 0.937 | 0.908 (0.386 - 2.135) | 0.825 |
aData at 1996-1997. bData adjusted for age. cVariables in model were age, sex, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, BMI, photometric O/N, and electrophoretic O/N. dOR, odds ratio; CI, 95% confidence interval.
Odds ratios of variables selected by backward stepwise elimination
| Characteristica | Multivariate OR (95% CI)b,c | |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 1.034 (1.010 - 1.059) | 0.005 |
| HbA1c (%) | 1.477 (0.980 - 2.225) | 0.062 |
| Photometric O/N | 2.012 (1.000 - 4.051) | 0.050 |
aData in 1996-1997; bOR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; cVariables evaluated for elimination were age, sex, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglyceride, fasting plasma glucose, HbA1c, fasting insulin, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, BMI, and photometric O/N, and electrophoretic O/N.
Figure 2ROC curves of photometric O/N in all participants for predicting future carotid artery atherosclerosis. AUC value was 0.552 (P = 0.084). Sensitivity and specificity were 0.719 and 0.548, respectively at photometric O/N cutoff of 1.8.