Literature DB >> 22230387

Ecomorphology, differentiated habitat use, and nocturnal activities of Rhinolophus and Hipposideros species in East Asian tropical forests.

Ya-Fu Lee1, Yen-Min Kuo, Wen-Chen Chu, Yu-Hsiu Lin, Hsing-Yi Chang, Wei-Ming Chen.   

Abstract

We investigated the wing morphology and foraging distributions of sympatric Rhinolophus and Hipposideros species by acoustic sampling, measuring wing parameters, and observing bats in different settings of tropical East Asian forests, to evaluate their flexibility in habitat use and edge sensitivity. R. formosae and H. terasensis were more abundant at edges/in open habitats and shared the highest overlap, with R. formosae displaying the greatest breadth in habitat use, whereas R. monoceros had a higher abundance and feeding efficiency in forest interiors with a continuous canopy. H. terasensis was significantly larger and had higher wing loading and aspect ratio than R. formosae and R. monoceros, while R. formosae had higher wing loading but a lower aspect ratio than the smaller-sized R. monoceros. Shrubs and herbs were higher at sites where bats were captured than at those without bat captures, and R. monoceros and R. formosae were associated with greater canopy and ground coverage, respectively. R. monoceros always foraged while flying at lower heights close to the herb/shrub layers, while H. terasensis and R. formosae used perching to different extents, with R. formosae preferably using fly-catching techniques and appearing farther from the path in open forests rather than in forest interiors. Our results indicate that differences in wing parameters account for the different degrees of flexibility in habitat use, yet the deviations of call frequency from the expected values in R. formosae and H. terasensis suggest additional adaptations accounting for their flexibility in exploring habitats.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22230387     DOI: 10.1016/j.zool.2011.07.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoology (Jena)        ISSN: 0944-2006            Impact factor:   2.240


  3 in total

1.  The noseleaf of Rhinolophus formosae focuses the Frequency Modulated (FM) component of the calls.

Authors:  Dieter Vanderelst; Ya-Fu Lee; Inga Geipel; Elisabeth K V Kalko; Yen-Min Kuo; Herbert Peremans
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.566

2.  Sensory trait variation in an echolocating bat suggests roles for both selection and plasticity.

Authors:  Lizelle J Odendaal; David S Jacobs; Jacqueline M Bishop
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.260

3.  Patterns of sexual size dimorphism in horseshoe bats: Testing Rensch's rule and potential causes.

Authors:  Hui Wu; Tinglei Jiang; Xiaobin Huang; Jiang Feng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.