| Literature DB >> 22230340 |
Wei Xu1, Chun-feng Liu, Li Yan, Jiu-jun Li, Li-jie Wang, Ying Qi, Rui-bo Cheng, Xiao-yu Xiong.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To explore the relationship between enteroviruses and hospitalized children with hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) complicated with nervous system disease. 234 hospitalized HFMD patients treated in Shengjing Hospital, Liaoning Province were analyzed retrospectively. Based on the presence and severity of nervous system disease, the patients were grouped as follows: general patients, severely ill patients, critically ill patients and fatal patients. Based on the detected pathogen, the patients were grouped as follows: Enterovirus 71 (EV71) infection, coxsackie A16 (CA16) infection and other enterovirus (OE) infection.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22230340 PMCID: PMC3268717 DOI: 10.1186/1743-422X-9-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Virol J ISSN: 1743-422X Impact factor: 4.099
Figure 1Distribution of HFMD patients in different months.
Analysis of the clinical data for 423 hospitalized patients
| general | severely | critically | fatal | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 189 | 197 | 28 | 9 | |||
| 85(45.0%) | 71(36%) | 16(57.1%) | 5(55.6%) | |||
| 3.045 ± 2.102 | 2.546 ± 1.730 | 1.893 ± 1.397 | 2.056 ± 1.509 | |||
| 125(66.1%) | 114(57.9%) | 25(89.3%) | 8(88.9%) | |||
| 116(61.4%) | 124(62.9%) | 23(82.1%) | 5(55.6%) | |||
| 4.44 ± 1.37 | 3.89 ± 1.26 | 3.92 ± 1.02 | 3.81 ± 0.96 | |||
| 8.85 ± 2.46 | 11.63 ± 5.04 | 49.51 ± 33.20 | 4.55 ± 1.91 | |||
| 86(45.5%) | 121(61.4%) | 27(96.4%) | 8(88.9%) | |||
| 5.24 ± 1.54 | 6.33 ± 1.94 | 8.38 ± 6.42 | 6.42 ± 2.25 | |||
| 38.76 ± 0.46 | 38.846 ± 0.62 | 39.206 ± 0.51 | 39.07 ± 0.41 | |||
| 173(91.5%) | 183(92.9%) | 23(82.1%) | 6(66.7%) | |||
| 121(64.0%) | 118(59.9) | 17(74.6) | 4(44.4%) | |||
| 76(40.2%) | 81(41.1%) | 6(21.4%) | 2(22.2%) | |||
| 2(7.1%) | 1(11.1%) | |||||
| 24(12.7%) | 47(23.9%) | 13(46.4%) | 5(55.6%) | |||
| 49(25.9%) | 18(9.1%) | 1©(3.6%) | 0 | |||
| 12(6.3%) | 6(3%) | 2(7.1%) | 0 | |||
| 0 | 2®(1%) | 11(39.3%) |
①There is statistically significant difference between general group and the other 3 groups but no difference in comparison to the other 3 groups. ②There is statistically significant difference between all groups. ③There is no difference between general groups and severely group or critically group and fatal group, but there is significant difference between each one of the former and the latter two groups. # There was no repeat counting in calculating the distribution of disease types. When neurogenic pulmonary edema or shock and brain stem encephalitis coexisted in the same patient, the former was counted. When neurogenic shock and pulmonary edema coexisted, pulmonary edema was counted. §The denominator of the fraction represents the cases examined, whereas the numerator represents the number of patients with this abnormality. ¤Among the 5 fatal cases, 2 died of neurogenic pulmonary edema, 2 died of shock and 1 patient was declared brain-dead
Figure 2Pathogen distributions in different months.
Comparison of the clinical data from patients with different enteroviruses
| EV71 | CA16 | OE | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 89 | 68 | 20 | |||
| 52(58.4%) | 38(55.9%) | 14(70%) | |||
| 2.382 ± 2.102 | 2.588 ± 1.860 | 1.875 ± 1.146 | |||
| 57(64%) | 41(60.3%) | 13(65%) | |||
| 3.258 ± 1.176 | 4 ± 1.258 | 3.6 ± 1.353 | |||
| 14.337 ± 17.796 | 9.338 ± 3.366 | 8.1 ± 3.354 | |||
| 51(57.3%) | 32(47.1%) | 11(55%) | |||
| 4(4.5%) | 3(4.4%) | 1(5%) | |||
| 6.034 ± 3.131 | 5.706 ± 1.684 | 5.45 ± 1.468 | |||
| 39.144 ± 0.563 | 38.919 ± 0.494 | 38.92 ± 0.618 | |||
| 81(91%) | 67(98.5%) | 20(100%) | |||
| 58(65.2%) | 50(73.5%) | 15(75%) | |||
| 39(43.8%) | 28(41.2%) | 6(30%) | |||
| 3(2.2%) | 0 | 0 | |||
| 65(73%) | 19(27.9%) | 8(40%) | |||
| 11(12.4%) | 1(1.5%) | 1(5%) | |||
| 5(7.3%) | 0 | 0 |
*Patients aged 0-12 months were counted as being 0.5 years of age; patients aged 1-2 years were counted as being 1.5 years of age; patients aged 2-3 years were counted as being 2.5 years of age, etc. ¤Among the 5 fatal cases, 2 patients died of neurogenic pulmonary edema, 2 died of shock, and 1 was diagnosed as being brain-dead. ② Statistically significant difference between groups A and B but no difference in comparison to the other 2 groups. ③There is statistically significant difference between group A and groups B and C but no difference in comparison to the other 2 groups
Data analysis of the clinical neurological damage caused by different pathogens
| EV71 | CA16 | OE | Total | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 65(70.7%) | 19(20.7%) | 8(8.7%) | |||
| 39(60%) | 16(82.4%) | 6(75%) | |||
| 2(3%) | 1(5.3%) | 0 | |||
| 8(12.3%) | 2(1.1%) | 0 | |||
| 11(16.9%) | 0 | 1(12.5%) | |||
| 5(7.7%) | 0 | 1(12.5%) | |||
| 51(78.5%) | 15(78.9%) | 6(75%) | |||
| 21(32.3%) | 4(21.1%) | 2(25%) | |||
| 42(64.6%) | 16(84.2%) | 7(87.5%) | |||
| 47(72.3%) | 17(89.5%) | 5(62.5%) | |||
| 24(36.9%) | 2(10.5%) | 1(12.5%) | |||
| 34(52.3%) | 3(15.8%) | 2(25%) | |||
| 31(47.7%) | 6(31.6%) | 2(25%) | |||
| 21/44(47.7%) | 8/14(57.1%) | 3/6(50%) | |||
| 15/44(34.1%) | 5/14(35.7%) | 2/6(33.3%) | |||
| 17/32(53.1%) | 4/13(30.8%) | 1/5(20%) | |||
| 13/32(40.6%) | 5/15(33.3%) | 2/6(33.3%) | |||
| 11(16.9%) | 1(5.3%) | 1(12.5%) | |||
| 5(7.7%) | 0 | 0 |
# There was no repeat counting in calculating the distribution of disease types. When neurogenic pulmonary edema or shock and brain stem encephalitis coexisted in the same patient, the former was counted. When neurogenic shock and pulmonary edema coexisted, pulmonary edema was counted. §The denominator of the fraction represents the cases examined, whereas the numerator represents the number of patients with this abnormality. ¤Among the 5 fatal cases, 2 died of neurogenic pulmonary edema, 2 died of shock and 1 patient was declared brain-dead
Nucleotide sequences of the specific primers and TaqMan probes used in this study
| Primer (5'-3') | Probe (5'-3') | |
|---|---|---|
| Forward:GCAAGTCTGTGGCGGAACC Reverse:TGTCACCATAAGCAGCCATGATA | (FAM)- AATAACAGGAAACACGGACACCCAAAGTA(TAMRA) | |
| Forward:GTTCACCTACATGCGCTTTGA Reverse:TGGAGCAATTGTGGGACAAC | (VIC)-TCTTGCGTGCACACCCACCG(TAMRA) | |
| Forward:CCTAAAGACTAATGAGACCACCC Reverse:CTAAAGGCAGCACACAATTCG | (TEXAS RED)-CTTGTGCTTTCCAGTGTCGGTGCA(TAMRA) | |
The analysis of real-time PCR data: the threshold cycle (CT) value for each sample was calculated by determining the point at which the fluorescence exceeded the threshold limit, and the cut off was 35.1 determined by the ROC curve. The results of negative, positive and quality controls which were included in each experiment were within the normal range.