BACKGROUND: Google Flu Trends (GFT) is a novel Internet-based influenza surveillance system that uses search engine query data to estimate influenza activity and is available in near real time. This study assesses the temporal correlation of city GFT data to cases of influenza and standard crowding indices from an inner-city emergency department (ED). METHODS: This study was performed during a 21-month period (from January 2009 through October 2010) at an urban academic hospital with physically and administratively separate adult and pediatric EDs. We collected weekly data from GFT for Baltimore, Maryland; ED Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-reported standardized influenzalike illness (ILI) data; laboratory-confirmed influenza data; and ED crowding indices (patient volume, number of patients who left without being seen, waiting room time, and length of stay for admitted and discharged patients). Pediatric and adult data were analyzed separately using cross-correlation with GFT. RESULTS: GFT correlated with both number of positive influenza test results (adult ED, r = 0.876; pediatric ED, r = 0.718) and number of ED patients presenting with ILI (adult ED, r = 0.885; pediatric ED, r = 0.652). Pediatric but not adult crowding measures, such as total ED volume (r = 0.649) and leaving without being seen (r = 0.641), also had good correlation with GFT. Adult crowding measures for low-acuity patients, such as waiting room time (r = 0.421) and length of stay for discharged patients (r = 0.548), had moderate correlation with GFT. CONCLUSIONS: City-level GFT shows strong correlation with influenza cases and ED ILI visits, validating its use as an ED surveillance tool. GFT correlated with several pediatric ED crowding measures and those for low-acuity adult patients.
BACKGROUND: Google Flu Trends (GFT) is a novel Internet-based influenza surveillance system that uses search engine query data to estimate influenza activity and is available in near real time. This study assesses the temporal correlation of city GFT data to cases of influenza and standard crowding indices from an inner-city emergency department (ED). METHODS: This study was performed during a 21-month period (from January 2009 through October 2010) at an urban academic hospital with physically and administratively separate adult and pediatric EDs. We collected weekly data from GFT for Baltimore, Maryland; ED Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-reported standardized influenzalike illness (ILI) data; laboratory-confirmed influenza data; and ED crowding indices (patient volume, number of patients who left without being seen, waiting room time, and length of stay for admitted and discharged patients). Pediatric and adult data were analyzed separately using cross-correlation with GFT. RESULTS: GFT correlated with both number of positive influenza test results (adult ED, r = 0.876; pediatric ED, r = 0.718) and number of ED patients presenting with ILI (adult ED, r = 0.885; pediatric ED, r = 0.652). Pediatric but not adult crowding measures, such as total ED volume (r = 0.649) and leaving without being seen (r = 0.641), also had good correlation with GFT. Adult crowding measures for low-acuity patients, such as waiting room time (r = 0.421) and length of stay for discharged patients (r = 0.548), had moderate correlation with GFT. CONCLUSIONS: City-level GFT shows strong correlation with influenza cases and ED ILI visits, validating its use as an ED surveillance tool. GFT correlated with several pediatric ED crowding measures and those for low-acuity adult patients.
Authors: Richard J Scarfone; Susan Coffin; Evan S Fieldston; Grace Falkowski; Mary G Cooney; Stephanie Grenfell Journal: Pediatr Emerg Care Date: 2011-06 Impact factor: 1.454
Authors: Daniel B Fagbuyi; Kathleen M Brown; David J Mathison; Jennifer Kingsnorth; Sephora Morrison; Mohsen Saidinejad; Jeff Greenberg; Michael Knapp; James M Chamberlain Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Carol A Glaser; Sabrina Gilliam; William W Thompson; David E Dassey; Stephen H Waterman; Mitchell Saruwatari; Stanley Shapiro; Keiji Fukuda Journal: Emerg Infect Dis Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 6.883
Authors: William W Thompson; David K Shay; Eric Weintraub; Lynnette Brammer; Carolyn B Bridges; Nancy J Cox; Keiji Fukuda Journal: JAMA Date: 2004-09-15 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Justin R Ortiz; Hong Zhou; David K Shay; Kathleen M Neuzil; Ashley L Fowlkes; Christopher H Goss Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-04-27 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Donald R Olson; Richard T Heffernan; Marc Paladini; Kevin Konty; Don Weiss; Farzad Mostashari Journal: PLoS Med Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 11.069
Authors: Andrea T Cruz; Binita Patel; Michael C DiStefano; Catherine R Codispoti; Joan E Shook; Gail J Demmler-Harrison; Paul E Sirbaugh Journal: Ann Emerg Med Date: 2009-10-17 Impact factor: 5.721
Authors: Laurie Kamimoto; Gary L Euler; Peng-Jun Lu; Arthur Reingold; James Hadler; Ken Gershman; Monica Farley; Pauline Terebuh; Patricia Ryan; Ruth Lynfield; Bernadette Albanese; Ann Thomas; Allen S Craig; William Schaffner; Lyn Finelli; Joseph Bresee; James A Singleton Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2012-12-13 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: John W Ayers; Benjamin M Althouse; Jon-Patrick Allem; Matthew A Childers; Waleed Zafar; Carl Latkin; Kurt M Ribisl; John S Brownstein Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2012-07-24 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Michael S Deiner; Thomas M Lietman; Stephen D McLeod; James Chodosh; Travis C Porco Journal: JAMA Ophthalmol Date: 2016-09-01 Impact factor: 7.389