Literature DB >> 22230170

Working range of stimulus flux transduction determines dendrite size and relative number of pheromone component receptor neurons in moths.

T C Baker1, M J Domingue, A J Myrick.   

Abstract

We are proposing that the "relative" abundances of the differently tuned pheromone-component-responsive olfactory receptor neurons (ORNs) on insect antennae are not a result of natural selection working to maximize absolute sensitivity to individual pheromone components. Rather, relative abundances are a result of specifically tuned sensillum-plus-ORN units having been selected to accurately transduce and report to the antennal lobe the maximal ranges of molecular flux imparted by each pheromone component in every plume strand. To not reach saturating stimulus flux levels from the most concentrated plume strands of a pheromone blend, the dendritic surface area of the ORN type that is tuned to the most abundant component of a pheromone blend is increased in dendritic diameter in order to express a greater number of major pheromone component-specific odorant receptors. The increased ability of these enlarged dendrite, major component-tuned ORNs to accurately report very high flux of its component results in a larger working range of stimulus flux able to be accurately transduced by that type of ORN. However, the larger dendrite size and possibly other high-flux adjustments in titers of pheromone-binding proteins and degrading enzymes cause a decrease in absolute sensitivity to lower flux levels of the major component in lower concentration strands of the pheromone blend. In order to restore the ability of the whole-antenna major pheromone component-specific channel to accurately report to its glomerulus the abundance of the major component in lower concentration strands, the number of major component ORNs over the entire antenna is adjusted upward, creating a greater proportion of major component-tuned ORNs than those tuned to minor components. Pheromone blend balance reported by the whole-antennal major and minor component channels in low plume-flux strands is now restored, and the relative fluxes of the 2 components occurring in both low- and high-flux strands are thereby accurately reported to the component-specific glomeruli. Thus, we suggest that the 2 phenomena, dendrite size and relative numbers of differentially tuned ORNs are linked, and both are related to wide disparities in molecular flux ranges occurring for the more abundant and less abundant components in the pheromone blend plume strands.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22230170     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjr122

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  10 in total

1.  Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying sex- and maturation-related variation in pheromone responses in honey bees (Apis mellifera).

Authors:  Gabriel Villar; Thomas C Baker; Harland M Patch; Christina M Grozinger
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Pheromone binding proteins enhance the sensitivity of olfactory receptors to sex pheromones in Chilo suppressalis.

Authors:  Hetan Chang; Yang Liu; Ting Yang; Paolo Pelosi; Shuanglin Dong; Guirong Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The Inheritance of the Pheromone Sensory System in Two Helicoverpa Species: Dominance of H. armigera and Possible Introgression from H. assulta.

Authors:  Meng Xu; Jun-Feng Dong; Han Wu; Xin-Cheng Zhao; Ling-Qiao Huang; Chen-Zhu Wang
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 5.505

4.  Encoding of Slowly Fluctuating Concentration Changes by Cockroach Olfactory Receptor Neurons Is Invariant to Air Flow Velocity.

Authors:  Maria Hellwig; Alexander Martzok; Harald Tichy
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-08-07       Impact factor: 4.566

5.  bric à brac controls sex pheromone choice by male European corn borer moths.

Authors:  Melanie Unbehend; Genevieve M Kozak; Fotini Koutroumpa; Brad S Coates; Teun Dekker; Astrid T Groot; David G Heckel; Erik B Dopman
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  A closer look at sex pheromone autodetection in the Oriental fruit moth.

Authors:  Alicia Pérez-Aparicio; Byrappa Ammagarahalli; César Gemeno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Peripheral coding of sex pheromone blends with reverse ratios in two helicoverpa species.

Authors:  Han Wu; Chao Hou; Ling-Qiao Huang; Fu-Shun Yan; Chen-Zhu Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Carbon dioxide and fruit odor transduction in Drosophila olfactory neurons. What controls their dynamic properties?

Authors:  Andrew S French; Shannon Meisner; Chih-Ying Su; Päivi H Torkkeli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Chopper-modulated gas chromatography electroantennography enabled using high-temperature MEMS flow control device.

Authors:  Ming-Da Zhou; Muhammad Akbar; Andrew J Myrick; Yiqiu Xia; Waleed J Khan; Xiang Gao; Thomas C Baker; Si-Yang Zheng
Journal:  Microsyst Nanoeng       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.127

10.  Citronellal perception and transmission by Anopheles gambiae s.s. (Diptera: Culicidae) females.

Authors:  Weijian Wu; Shanshan Li; Min Yang; Yongwen Lin; Kaibin Zheng; Komivi Senyo Akutse
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.