Literature DB >> 22230148

The Leipzig prospective vascular ultrasound registry in radial artery catheterization: impact of sheath size on vascular complications.

Madlen Uhlemann1, Sven Möbius-Winkler, Meinhard Mende, Ingo Eitel, Georg Fuernau, Marcus Sandri, Volker Adams, Holger Thiele, Axel Linke, Gerhard Schuler, Stephan Gielen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the impact of sheath size on the rate of radial artery occlusions (RAO) (primary objective) and other access site complications (hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysm, arteriovenous fistula) as secondary objectives after transradial coronary catheterization.
BACKGROUND: The number of vascular access complications in the published data ranges from 5% to 38% after transradial catheterization.
METHODS: Between November 2009 and August 2010, 455 patients 65.3 ± 10.9 years of age (62.2% male) with transradial access with 5-F (n = 153) or 6-F (n = 302) arterial sheaths were prospectively recruited. Duplex sonography was obtained in each patient before discharge. Patients with symptomatic RAO were treated with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), and a follow-up was performed.
RESULTS: The incidence of access site complications was 14.4% with 5-F sheaths compared with 33.1% with 6-F sheaths (p < 0.001). Radial artery occlusion occurred in 13.7% with 5-F sheaths compared with 30.5% with 6-F sheaths (p < 0.001). There was no difference between groups with regard to hemorrhage, pseudoaneurysms, or arteriovenous fistulas. Female sex, larger sheath size, peripheral arterial occlusive disease, and younger age independently predicted RAO in multivariate analysis. In total, 42.5% of patients with RAO were immediately symptomatic; another 7% became symptomatic within a mean of 4 days. Of patients with RAO, 59% were treated with LMWH. The recanalization rates were significantly higher in patients receiving LMWH compared with conventional therapy (55.6% vs. 13.5%, p < 0.001) after a mean of 14 days.
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of RAO by vascular ultrasound was higher than expected from previous data, especially in patients who underwent the procedure with larger sheaths.
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22230148     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2011.08.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  44 in total

1.  Evaluation of Previously Cannulated Radial Arteries.

Authors:  Harinder Singh Bedi
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2015-12-01

2.  The history of arterial revascularization: from Kolesov to Tector and beyond.

Authors:  Brian F Buxton; Sean D Galvin
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-07

Review 3.  Radial artery occlusion after transradial approach to cardiac catheterization.

Authors:  John F Wagener; Sunil V Rao
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Radial artery occlusion after transradial coronary catheterization.

Authors:  Grigorios Avdikos; Aris Karatasakis; Andreas Tsoumeleas; Efstathios Lazaris; Antonios Ziakas; Michael Koutouzis
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2017-06

Review 5.  Vascular access and closure in coronary angiography and percutaneous intervention.

Authors:  Robert A Byrne; Salvatore Cassese; Maryam Linhardt; Adnan Kastrati
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 32.419

6.  Identification and management of complications of transradial procedures.

Authors:  Adhir Shroff; Saifullah Siddiqui; Aaron Burg; Ish Singla
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Early and late response-to-injury in patients undergoing transradial coronary angiography: arterial remodeling in smokers.

Authors:  Roberto Sansone; Emilia Stegemann; Göksen Ozaslan; Dominik Schuler; Margarete Lukosz; Ana Rodriguez-Mateos; Thomas Lauer; Ralf Westenfeld; Malte Kelm; Christian Heiss
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2014-06-28

8.  Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion following trans-radial coronary intervention using 6-french versus 7-french sheaths.

Authors:  Yanming Fan; Qingmin Wei; Junna Cai; Yanbo Wang; Xianghua Fu
Journal:  Cardiol J       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.737

Review 9.  Radial Artery and Ulnar Artery Occlusions Following Coronary Procedures and the Impact of Anticoagulation: ARTEMIS (Radial and Ulnar ARTEry Occlusion Meta-AnalysIS) Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  George Hahalis; Konstantinos Aznaouridis; Gregory Tsigkas; Periklis Davlouros; Ioanna Xanthopoulou; Nikolaos Koutsogiannis; Ioanna Koniari; Marianna Leopoulou; Olivier Costerousse; Dimitris Tousoulis; Olivier F Bertrand
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 5.501

Review 10.  Should the radial artery be used as a bypass graft following radial access coronary angiography.

Authors:  Lisa M Lim; Sean D Galvin; Mohamed Javid; George Matalanis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.