Literature DB >> 22229615

Autologous chondrocyte implantation for knee cartilage injuries: moderate functional outcome and performance in patients with high-impact activities.

Andreas Panagopoulos1, Louw van Niekerk, Ioannis Triantafillopoulos.   

Abstract

Few studies have assessed the results of autologous chondrocyte implantation in patients with high-impact activities. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the early functional outcome and activity level after 2-stage autologous chondrocyte implantation in professional soldiers and athletes. Nineteen patients with an average age of 32.2 years were treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation and followed up for a minimum of 2 years. All patients except 2 had received previous arthroscopic treatment with debridement and/or microfracture. The mean size of the postdebridement defect was 6.54 cm2. Using Novocart technology (B. Braun-Tetec, Reutlingen, Germany), periosteal patch and matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte implantation was sequentially performed with no randomization. The average subjective knee evaluation score and Lysholm score improved from 39.16 and 42.42, respectively, preoperatively to 62.4 and 69.4, respectively, at latest follow-up. Median Tegner activity score was 8.8 before injury, 3.8 preoperatively, and 6.15 at latest follow-up. Second-look arthroscopy was performed in 11 patients due to persistent pain, decreased range of movement, and mechanical symptoms. Six of 19 (31.5%) patients with professional or recreational athletic activities returned to preinjury levels of athletic performance.This study shows that mid-term results with autologous chondrocyte implantation in high-performance patients are not as good as have been reported with other similar technologies. Motivational issues during prolonged rehabilitation, multiple surgical interventions before autologous chondrocyte implantation, patient age, and large defects can potentially influence the outcome and overall performance in this selected group of patients. Copyright 2012, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22229615     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20111122-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  12 in total

Review 1.  The comparison between the different generations of autologous chondrocyte implantation with other treatment modalities: a systematic review of clinical trials.

Authors:  Ely Zarina Samsudin; Tunku Kamarul
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Chondrogenic Gene Expression Differences between Chondrocytes from Osteoarthritic and Non-OA Trauma Joints in a 3D Collagen Type I Hydrogel.

Authors:  Vivek Jeyakumar; Florian Halbwirth; Eugenia Niculescu-Morzsa; Christoph Bauer; Hannes Zwickl; Daniela Kern; Stefan Nehrer
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 3.  Return to sport after the surgical management of articular cartilage lesions in the knee: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aaron J Krych; Ayoosh Pareek; Alexander H King; Nick R Johnson; Michael J Stuart; Riley J Williams
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Knee Cartilage Defect Characteristics Vary among Symptomatic Recreational and Competitive Scholastic Athletes Eligible for Cartilage Restoration Surgery.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Zak Boggs; Alex C DiBartola; Brennan Wright; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Low rate of return to pre-injury sport level in athletes after cartilage surgery: a 10-year follow-up study.

Authors:  S Zaffagnini; F Vannini; A Di Martino; L Andriolo; A Sessa; F Perdisa; F Balboni; G Filardo
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Cartiform Implantation for focal cartilage defects in the knee: A 2-year clinical and magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study.

Authors:  Craig H Bennett; Vidushan Nadarajah; Michelle C Moore; Julio J Jauregui; Andrew G Dubina; Cameran Burt; Derik L Davis; Arvinder Uppal; R Frank Henn
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-02-23

7.  Activity-Related Outcomes of Articular Cartilage Surgery: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Peter N Chalmers; Hari Vigneswaran; Joshua D Harris; Brian J Cole
Journal:  Cartilage       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Matrix assisted autologous chondrocyte transplantation for cartilage treatment: A systematic review.

Authors:  E Kon; G Filardo; B Di Matteo; F Perdisa; M Marcacci
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 9.  Cartilage Defect Treatments: With or without Cells? Mesenchymal Stem Cells or Chondrocytes? Traditional or Matrix-Assisted? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses.

Authors:  Zhantao Deng; Jiewen Jin; Jianning Zhao; Haidong Xu
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 5.443

10.  Human Suprapatellar Fat Pad-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Induce Chondrogenesis and Cartilage Repair in a Model of Severe Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Ignacio Muñoz-Criado; Jose Meseguer-Ripolles; Maravillas Mellado-López; Ana Alastrue-Agudo; Richard J Griffeth; Jerónimo Forteza-Vila; Ramón Cugat; Montserrat García; Victoria Moreno-Manzano
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2017-07-09       Impact factor: 5.443

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.