Literature DB >> 22228620

Comparing gait performance of people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease who do and do not wear ankle foot orthoses.

Gita M Ramdharry1, Alexander J Pollard, Jonathan F Marsden, Mary M Reilly.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) are commonly prescribed for people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) disease. Scant evidence exists to guide the type and timing of orthotic prescription. This study explores the latter issue by investigating the differences in presentation and gait function of people with CMT disease who wore AFOs for daily mobility (n = 11) and a group who did not (n = 21). The aim was to see if there was a difference in the characteristics in people who regularly wear AFOs.
METHODS: Primary measures of gait function were a 10-m timed walk (comfortable and maximum speed) and a 6-minute walk test. Means of the variables were compared using independent t-tests. Secondary measures included disease severity, lower limb muscle strength, sensory impairment, walking effort, fatigue severity and perceived walking ability.
RESULTS: AFO wearers walked slower with higher effort. They also had greater disease severity, weaker leg muscles and perceived greater walking difficulty. Subjects not wearing AFOs showed significant relationships between gait variables and muscle strength, whereas AFO wearers showed significant relationships between gait variables and perceived walking ability, fatigue severity and effort.
CONCLUSIONS: People who regularly wore AFOs were more severely affected, had a slower maximum walking speed, higher energy cost of walking and worse perceived walking ability. Walking ability in this group was related to fatigue, perceived exertion during walking and perceived walking ability. Gait function of people not using AFOs was determined by lower limb muscle function. People prescribed AFOs, those who do not wear them and those not prescribed AFOs were similar in presentation, suggesting that people choose to wear orthoses when their condition becomes sufficiently severe.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228620     DOI: 10.1002/pri.531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Res Int        ISSN: 1358-2267


  6 in total

Review 1.  Patient Compliance With Wearing Lower Limb Assistive Devices: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Ayisha Z Bashir; Danae M Dinkel; Iraklis I Pipinos; Jason M Johanning; Sara A Myers
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 1.300

2.  Feasibility of designing, manufacturing and delivering 3D printed ankle-foot orthoses: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Wojciechowski; Angela Y Chang; Daniel Balassone; Jacqueline Ford; Tegan L Cheng; David Little; Manoj P Menezes; Sean Hogan; Joshua Burns
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2019-02-07       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Digital mapping of a manual fabrication method for paediatric ankle-foot orthoses.

Authors:  Joyce Zhanzi Wang; Jonathon Lillia; Muhannad Farhan; Lei Bi; Jinman Kim; Joshua Burns; Tegan L Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  Use and Usability Of Custom-Made Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses In Polio Survivors with Knee Instability: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Bart Raijmakers; Roelofine A Berendsen-de Gooijer; Hilde E Ploeger; Fieke S Koopman; Frans Nollet; Merel-Anne Brehm
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2022-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Satisfaction with ankle foot orthoses in individuals with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Authors:  Riccardo Zuccarino; Kirsten M Anderson; Michael E Shy; Jason M Wilken
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2020-08-26       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Orthotic management of instability of the knee related to neuromuscular and central nervous system disorders: qualitative interview study of patient perspectives.

Authors:  Dorothy McCaughan; Alison Booth; Cath Jackson; Simon Lalor; Gita Ramdharry; Rory J O'Connor; Margaret Phillips; Roy Bowers; Catriona McDaid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.