Literature DB >> 22228573

Ten-year survey reveals differences in GP management of neck and back pain.

Zoe A Michaleff1, Christopher Harrison, Helena Britt, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Chris G Maher.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Clinical guidelines provide similar recommendations for the management of new neck pain and low back pain (LBP) but it is unclear if general practitioner's (GP) care is similar. While GP's management of LBP is well documented, little is known about GP's management of neck pain. We aimed to describe GP's management of new neck pain and compare this to GP's management of new LBP in Australia between April 2000 and March 2010.
METHODS: All GP-patient encounters for a new (i.e. first visit to any medical practitioner) neck pain or LBP problem were compared in terms of treatment delivered, referral patterns and requests for laboratory and imaging investigations.
RESULTS: General practitioners in Australia have managed new neck pain and LBP problems at a rate of 3.1 and 5.8 per 1,000 GP-patient encounters, respectively. GP's primarily utilised medications, in particular non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, to manage new neck and LBP problems and referred approximately 25% of all patients for imaging. Patients with new neck pain are more frequently managed using physical treatments and were referred more often to allied health professionals and specialists. In comparison, patients with new LBP were managed more frequently with medication, advice, provision of a sickness certificate and ordering of pathology tests.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the first time GP management of a new episode of neck pain has been documented using a nationally representative sample and it is also the first time that the management of back and neck pain has been compared. Despite guidelines endorsing a similar approach for the management of new neck pain and LBP, in actual clinical practice Australian GPs manage these two conditions differently.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228573      PMCID: PMC3389113          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-011-2135-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

1.  Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of evidence-based guidelines for the management of acute low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  B McGuirk; W King; J Govind; J Lowry; N Bogduk
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Violeta González-Urzelai; Loreto Palacio-Elua; Josefina López-de-Munain
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  An updated overview of clinical guidelines for the management of non-specific low back pain in primary care.

Authors:  Bart W Koes; Maurits van Tulder; Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Luciana G Macedo; James McAuley; Chris Maher
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Referral and consultation in primary care: do we understand what we're doing?

Authors:  P A Nutting; P Franks; C M Clancy
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 0.493

5.  Low back pain in general practice: reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in The Netherlands.

Authors:  H Schers; J Braspenning; R Drijver; M Wensing; R Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Improving the quality of care of musculoskeletal conditions in primary care.

Authors:  C Roberts; A O Adebajo; S Long
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain in primary care: an international comparison.

Authors:  B W Koes; M W van Tulder; R Ostelo; A Kim Burton; G Waddell
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Physician office visits for low back pain. Frequency, clinical evaluation, and treatment patterns from a U.S. national survey.

Authors:  L G Hart; R A Deyo; D C Cherkin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Utilization of medical services for the treatment of acute low back pain: conformance with clinical guidelines.

Authors:  W S Schroth; J M Schectman; E G Elinsky; J C Panagides
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1992 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 10.  Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions.

Authors:  Anthony D Woolf; Bruce Pfleger
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 9.408

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Worsening trends in analgesics recommended for spinal pain in primary care.

Authors:  Stephanie Mathieson; Lisa Valenti; Christopher G Maher; Helena Britt; Qiang Li; Andrew J McLachlan; Chung-Wei Christine Lin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Clinician's Commentary on Belot et al.1.

Authors:  James M Elliott; D Mark Courtney
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

4.  OPAL: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial of opioid analgesia for the reduction of pain severity in people with acute spinal pain. Trial protocol.

Authors:  Chung-Wei Christine Lin; Andrew J McLachlan; Jane Latimer; Ric O Day; Laurent Billot; Bart W Koes; Chris G Maher
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Management of Whiplash Associated Disorders in Australian general practice.

Authors:  Jane Nikles; Michael Yelland; Clare Bayram; Graeme Miller; Michele Sterling
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Clinician education unlikely effective for guideline-adherent medication prescription in low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs.

Authors:  Daniel L Belavy; Scott D Tagliaferri; Paul Buntine; Tobias Saueressig; Kate Sadler; Christy Ko; Clint T Miller; Patrick J Owen
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2022-01-03

7.  Efficacy, acceptability, and safety of muscle relaxants for adults with non-specific low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aidan G Cashin; Thiago Folly; Matthew K Bagg; Michael A Wewege; Matthew D Jones; Michael C Ferraro; Hayley B Leake; Rodrigo R N Rizzo; Siobhan M Schabrun; Sylvia M Gustin; Richard Day; Christopher M Williams; James H McAuley
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-07-07

8.  Pain medication management of musculoskeletal conditions at first presentation in primary care: analysis of routinely collected medical record data.

Authors:  Mehluli Ndlovu; John Bedson; Peter W Jones; Kelvin P Jordan
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.362

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.