Literature DB >> 22228432

Methylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter gene in triple-negative breast cancer patients.

Caterina Fumagalli1, Giancarlo Pruneri, Paola Possanzini, Michela Manzotti, Monica Barile, Irene Feroce, Marco Colleoni, Bernardo Bonanni, Patrick Maisonneuve, Paolo Radice, Giuseppe Viale, Massimo Barberis.   

Abstract

Triple-negative breast cancers are characterized by the triple-negative (ER/PgR/Her2 negative) phenotype, are frequently associated with BRCA gene mutation, and are not candidate to currently available endocrine and HER2-targeted treatments. MGMT is involved in direct DNA repair exerted by cleavage of mutagenic alkyl adducts within DNA, and its epigenetic silencing confers susceptibility to DNA-damaging alkylating agents in glioblastomas and melanomas. MGMT methylation status has not been extensively investigated in breast cancer patients. The goal of our study was to evaluate the MGMT methylation status in TNBC patients, for most of which BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutational status was known. We evaluated MGMT methylation status by methylation-specific PCR (MSP) in formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor specimens from 92 TNBC patients. By using the GelDoc system (Biorad) software, the cases were further classified as follows: 0 (absence of methylated signal), 1 (prevalence of unmethylated signal, U/M ratio>1), 2 (prevalence of methylated signal, U/M ratio<1), and 3 (absence of unmethylated signal). MSP products were obtained in 89 (96.7%) of the cases. Overall, 15 (16.9%) cases were classified as 0, 33 (37.1%) cases as 1, 39 (43.8%) cases as 2, and 2 (2.2%) cases as 3. The 48 cases classified as 0 and 1 were considered as MGMT unmethylated, and the 41 cases classified as 2 and 3 as MGMT methylated. The prevalence of MGMT methylation in patients with BRCA1 mutated, wild-type, and unknown was 30.2% (13/43), 63.6% (14/22), and 58.3% (14/24), respectively. MGMT methylation was unrelated to the main clinical pathological characteristics, with the exception of a weak association with advanced age. In conclusion, our data suggest that in TNBC with wild-type BRCA1, the direct DNA repair system may be frequently (63.6%) silenced by MGMT methylation. The evaluation of the MGMT status could offer a new adjunct in predicting tumor response to alkylating drugs in TNBC patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228432     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1945-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  13 in total

1.  Validation of DNA promoter hypermethylation biomarkers in breast cancer--a short report.

Authors:  Jolien S de Groot; Xiaojuan Pan; Jan Meeldijk; Elsken van der Wall; Paul J van Diest; Cathy B Moelans
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2014-08-16       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Protein expression and methylation of MGMT, a DNA repair gene and their correlation with clinicopathological parameters in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

Authors:  Asia Asiaf; Shiekh Tanveer Ahmad; Ajaz Ahmad Malik; Shiekh Aejaz Aziz; Zubaida Rasool; Akbar Masood; Mohammad Afzal Zargar
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-03-29

3.  O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase and ATP-Binding Cassette Membrane Transporter G2 Promotor Methylation: Can Predict the Response to Chemotherapy in Advanced Breast Cancer?

Authors:  Sara Ahmed Aglan; Ahmad Mohamad Zaki; Amel Sobhy El Sedfy; Heba Gaber El-Sheredy; Ola Hussein Elgaddar
Journal:  Rep Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2022-04

4.  Triple negative breast cancers have a reduced expression of DNA repair genes.

Authors:  Enilze Ribeiro; Monica Ganzinelli; Daniele Andreis; Ramona Bertoni; Roberto Giardini; Stephen B Fox; Massimo Broggini; Alberto Bottini; Vanessa Zanoni; Letizia Bazzola; Chiara Foroni; Daniele Generali; Giovanna Damia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Repairing of N-mustard derivative BO-1055 induced DNA damage requires NER, HR, and MGMT-dependent DNA repair mechanisms.

Authors:  Ching-Ying Kuo; Wen-Cheng Chou; Chin-Chung Wu; Teng-Song Wong; Rajesh Kakadiya; Te-Chang Lee; Tsann-Long Su; Hui-Chun Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-22

6.  Identification of a prognosis‑associated signature associated with energy metabolism in triple‑negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Chao Li; Xujun Li; Guangming Li; Long Sun; Wei Zhang; Jing Jiang; Qidong Ge
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-06-23       Impact factor: 3.906

7.  Methylation profile of triple-negative breast carcinomas.

Authors:  M T Branham; D M Marzese; S R Laurito; F E Gago; J I Orozco; O M Tello; L M Vargas-Roig; M Roqué
Journal:  Oncogenesis       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 7.485

8.  O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase as a prognostic and predictive marker for basal-like breast cancer treated with cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Sayuri Isono; Makoto Fujishima; Tatsuya Azumi; Yukihiko Hashimoto; Yoshifumi Komoike; Masao Yukawa; Masahiro Watatani
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.967

9.  Heavy metals effect on breast cancer progression.

Authors:  А Romaniuk; M Lyndin; V Sikora; Y Lyndina; S Romaniuk; K Sikora
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.646

10.  CpG promoter methylation of the ALKBH3 alkylation repair gene in breast cancer.

Authors:  Olafur Andri Stefansson; Stefan Hermanowicz; Jasper van der Horst; Holmfridur Hilmarsdottir; Zuzanna Staszczak; Jon Gunnlaugur Jonasson; Laufey Tryggvadottir; Thorkell Gudjonsson; Stefan Sigurdsson
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.