Literature DB >> 22228256

Acceptance and opinions of Intanza/IDflu intradermal influenza vaccine in the Czech Republic and Turkey.

Roman Prymula1, Gaye Usluer, Serdar Altinel, Radka Sichova, Françoise Weber.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intanza(®)/IDflu(®) (Sanofi Pasteur SA, Lyon, France), a split-virion, trivalent influenza vaccine delivered by intradermal injection with a microinjection system, became available in adults 18-59 years of age (9 μg) and ≥60 years of age (15 μg) as of the 2010/2011 northern hemisphere influenza season.
METHODS: This study assessed the acceptability of intradermal vaccination with Intanza/IDflu in routine clinical practice in adult vaccinees and their vaccine prescribers. Vaccine prescribers and adults who had elected to be vaccinated with Intanza/IDflu during the 2010/2011 northern hemisphere influenza season were recruited to complete surveys about their opinions of influenza vaccination and their acceptance of the intradermal vaccination. Czech subjects 18-59 years of age were vaccinated with the 9 μg formulation and those ≥60 years of age with the 15 μg formulation of Intanza/IDflu. All Turkish subjects were vaccinated with the 9 μg formulation, as Intanza/IDflu 15 μg was not available in Turkey at the time the survey was conducted.
RESULTS: One thousand and twelve vaccinees and 28 vaccine prescribers in the Czech Republic, and 249 vaccinees and 15 vaccine prescribers in Turkey completed questionnaires. Overall, 96.1% of vaccinees were satisfied or very satisfied with Intanza/IDflu. The main reason for satisfaction was that the injection was considered minimally painful. Most (93.9%) vaccinees reported that they would prefer to receive the same vaccination next year. Furthermore, 95.3% of vaccine prescribers were satisfied or very satisfied with the intradermal vaccine, and 82.6% preferred intradermal over intramuscular vaccination.
CONCLUSIONS: Intradermal vaccination for seasonal influenza using Intanza/IDflu is well accepted by adult vaccinees and vaccine prescribers. By providing an additional, well-accepted method, Intanza/IDflu might help increase seasonal influenza vaccination rates in adults.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228256     DOI: 10.1007/s12325-011-0090-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Ther        ISSN: 0741-238X            Impact factor:   3.845


  7 in total

1.  Acceptance of intradermal inactivated influenza vaccines among hospital staff following 2 seasonal vaccination campaigns.

Authors:  Laura Goodliffe; Brenda L Coleman; Allison J McGeer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Traditional and new influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sook-San Wong; Richard J Webby
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Intradermal vaccination using the novel microneedle device MicronJet600: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Yotam Levin; Efrat Kochba; Ivan Hung; Richard Kenney
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Immunogenicity, safety and tolerability of intradermal influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Ivan F N Hung; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Intanza (®) 9 µg intradermal seasonal influenza vaccine for adults 18 to 59 years of age.

Authors:  Isabel Leroux-Roels; Françoise Weber
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Intradermal vaccination for infants and children.

Authors:  Akihiko Saitoh; Yuta Aizawa
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Microneedle patches: usability and acceptability for self-vaccination against influenza.

Authors:  James J Norman; Jaya M Arya; Maxine A McClain; Paula M Frew; Martin I Meltzer; Mark R Prausnitz
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 3.641

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.