Literature DB >> 22228162

Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of synchronous colorectal cancers: heterogeneity of clinical outcome depending on microsatellite instability status of individual tumors.

Jeong M Bae1, Nam-Yun Cho, Tae-You Kim, Gyeong H Kang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The contribution of chromosomal instability, microsatellite instability, and epigenetic instability to the development of synchronous colorectal carcinomas is controversial.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the relative roles of microsatellite instability and epigenetic instability in the development of synchronous colorectal cancers.
DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of medical records with histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular examination of stored tissue samples.
SETTING: The study took place at Seoul National University Hospital, Korea. PATIENTS: A total of 46 patients with synchronous colorectal cancers and 105 patients with solitary colorectal cancers were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics including microsatellite instability, mismatch repair gene expression, CpG island methylator phenotype, and mutation of KRAS and BRAF were analyzed.
RESULTS: Patients with synchronous tumors were more likely to be men than those with solitary tumors and had a tendency toward colocalization of individual tumors in the left or right colon. MSI-deficient cancers were more frequent in synchronous than in solitary cancers. The frequencies of CpG island methylator phenotype-high and KRAS and BRAF mutations were not different between synchronous and solitary cancers. No differences between synchronous cancers and solitary cancers were observed in overall survival or progression-free survival. Within the synchronous cancer group, patients with individual tumors discordant for microsatellite instability status had the worst clinical outcome, whereas those with individual tumors concordant for microsatellite instability-deficient status had the best clinical outcome. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective nature. Molecular analysis was performed only on cancerous lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that microsatellite instability plays a more important role than does epigenetic instability in the development of synchronous colorectal cancers, and that information regarding concordant or discordant microsatellite instability status between individual tumors might help to predict clinical outcome of synchronous colorectal cancers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228162     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823c46ce

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  9 in total

Review 1.  Etiologic field effect: reappraisal of the field effect concept in cancer predisposition and progression.

Authors:  Paul Lochhead; Andrew T Chan; Reiko Nishihara; Charles S Fuchs; Andrew H Beck; Edward Giovannucci; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2014-06-13       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Synchronous colorectal cancer: clinical, pathological and molecular implications.

Authors:  Alfred King-Yin Lam; Sally Sze-Yan Chan; Melissa Leung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Mutation profiles of synchronous colorectal cancers from a patient with Lynch syndrome suggest distinct oncogenic pathways.

Authors:  Scott R Wheeler; Chanjuan Shi; Jonathan A Holt; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-06

4.  RAS mutations vary between lesions in synchronous primary colorectal cancer: testing only one lesion is not sufficient to guide anti-EGFR treatment decisions.

Authors:  Mariana Petaccia de Macedo; Fernanda Machado de Melo; Júlia da Silva Ribeiro; Celso Abdon Lopes de Mello; Maria Dirlei Ferreira de Souza Begnami; Fernando Augusto Soares; Dirce Maria Carraro; Isabela Werneck da Cunha
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2015-02-09

5.  Clinical characteristics of synchronous colorectal cancers in Japan.

Authors:  Takaharu Kato; Sergio Alonso; Yuta Muto; Hiroshi Noda; Yasuyuki Miyakura; Koichi Suzuki; Shingo Tsujinaka; Masaaki Saito; Manuel Perucho; Toshiki Rikiyama
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Association between Mismatch-repair Genetic variation and the Risk of Multiple Primary Cancers: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Pengfei Kong; Ruiyan Wu; Yadong Lan; Wenzhuo He; Chenlu Yang; Chenxi Yin; Qiong Yang; Chang Jiang; Dazhi Xu; Liangping Xia
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2017-09-16       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Molecular heterogeneity and prognostic implications of synchronous advanced colorectal neoplasia.

Authors:  A Malesci; G Basso; P Bianchi; L Fini; F Grizzi; G Celesti; G Di Caro; G Delconte; F Dattola; A Repici; M Roncalli; M Montorsi; L Laghi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Patients with genetically heterogeneous synchronous colorectal cancer carry rare damaging germline mutations in immune-related genes.

Authors:  Matteo Cereda; Gennaro Gambardella; Lorena Benedetti; Fabio Iannelli; Dominic Patel; Gianluca Basso; Rosalinda F Guerra; Thanos P Mourikis; Ignazio Puccio; Shruti Sinha; Luigi Laghi; Jo Spencer; Manuel Rodriguez-Justo; Francesca D Ciccarelli
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  MicroRNA Expression Profile Reveals miR-17-92 and miR-143-145 Cluster in Synchronous Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Wen-Jian Meng; Lie Yang; Qin Ma; Hong Zhang; Gunnar Adell; Gunnar Arbman; Zi-Qiang Wang; Yuan Li; Zong-Guang Zhou; Xiao-Feng Sun
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.