Literature DB >> 22228086

Comparison of genomic DNA extraction techniques from whole blood samples: a time, cost and quality evaluation study.

Diego Chacon-Cortes1, Larisa M Haupt, Rod A Lea, Lyn R Griffiths.   

Abstract

Genomic DNA obtained from patient whole blood samples is a key element for genomic research. Advantages and disadvantages, in terms of time-efficiency, cost-effectiveness and laboratory requirements, of procedures available to isolate nucleic acids need to be considered before choosing any particular method. These characteristics have not been fully evaluated for some laboratory techniques, such as the salting out method for DNA extraction, which has been excluded from comparison in different studies published to date. We compared three different protocols (a traditional salting out method, a modified salting out method and a commercially available kit method) to determine the most cost-effective and time-efficient method to extract DNA. We extracted genomic DNA from whole blood samples obtained from breast cancer patient volunteers and compared the results of the product obtained in terms of quantity (concentration of DNA extracted and DNA obtained per ml of blood used) and quality (260/280 ratio and polymerase chain reaction product amplification) of the obtained yield. On average, all three methods showed no statistically significant differences between the final result, but when we accounted for time and cost derived for each method, they showed very significant differences. The modified salting out method resulted in a seven- and twofold reduction in cost compared to the commercial kit and traditional salting out method, respectively and reduced time from 3 days to 1 hour compared to the traditional salting out method. This highlights a modified salting out method as a suitable choice to be used in laboratories and research centres, particularly when dealing with a large number of samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22228086     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-011-1408-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  12 in total

1.  Modified salting-out method: high-yield, high-quality genomic DNA extraction from whole blood using laundry detergent.

Authors:  H Nasiri; M Forouzandeh; M J Rasaee; F Rahbarizadeh
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.352

2.  Association of selected polymorphisms of CCND1, p21, and caspase8 with colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Bing Liu; Yongjing Zhang; Mingjuan Jin; Qin Ni; Xia Liang; Xinyuan Ma; Kaiyan Yao; Qilong Li; Kun Chen
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.784

3.  A simple salting out procedure for extracting DNA from human nucleated cells.

Authors:  S A Miller; D D Dykes; H F Polesky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-02-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Genomic DNA extraction from whole blood stored from 15- to 30-years at -20 °C by rapid phenol-chloroform protocol: a useful tool for genetic epidemiology studies.

Authors:  Fabio Di Pietro; Francesco Ortenzi; Martina Tilio; Fabio Concetti; Valerio Napolioni
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  A simple and efficient non-organic procedure for the isolation of genomic DNA from blood.

Authors:  J Grimberg; S Nawoschik; L Belluscio; R McKee; A Turck; A Eisenberg
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-10-25       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Nanobody-based chimeric receptor gene integration in Jurkat cells mediated by φC31 integrase.

Authors:  Farnoush Jafari Iri-Sofla; Fatemeh Rahbarizadeh; Davoud Ahmadvand; Mohammad J Rasaee
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 3.905

7.  The association of XPC polymorphisms and tea drinking with colorectal cancer risk in a Chinese population.

Authors:  Yinyin Wu; Mingjuan Jin; Bing Liu; Xia Liang; Yunxian Yu; Qilong Li; Xinyuan Ma; Kaiyan Yao; Kun Chen
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 4.784

8.  Genetic polymorphisms of transforming growth factor-beta1 and its receptors and colorectal cancer susceptibility: a population-based case-control study in China.

Authors:  Yongjing Zhang; Bing Liu; Mingjuan Jin; Qin Ni; Xia Liang; Xinyuan Ma; Kaiyan Yao; Qilong Li; Kun Chen
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2008-11-25       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  TLR4 single-nucleotide polymorphisms alter mucosal cytokine and chemokine patterns in Mexican patients with Helicobacter pylori-associated gastroduodenal diseases.

Authors:  Alejandra Trejo-de la O; Javier Torres; Martha Pérez-Rodríguez; Margarita Camorlinga-Ponce; L Flores Luna; José M Abdo-Francis; Eduardo Lazcano; Carmen Maldonado-Bernal
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Biobanks for genomics and genomics for biobanks.

Authors:  Anne Cambon-Thomsen; Pascal Ducournau; Pierre-Antoine Gourraud; David Pontille
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2003
View more
  28 in total

1.  Association of heparan sulfate proteoglycans SDC1 and SDC4 polymorphisms with breast cancer in an Australian Caucasian population.

Authors:  Rachel K Okolicsanyi; Anne Buffiere; Jose M E Jacinto; Diego Chacon-Cortes; Suzanne K Chambers; Philippa H Youl; Larisa M Haupt; Lyn R Griffiths
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-11-01

2.  Genotyping analysis of 3 RET polymorphisms demonstrates low somatic mutation rate in Chinese Hirschsprung disease patients.

Authors:  Zhen Zhang; Qian Jiang; Qi Li; Wei Cheng; Guoliang Qiao; Ping Xiao; Liang Gan; Lin Su; Chunyue Miao; Long Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-05-01

3.  A rapid and efficient DNA extraction protocol from fresh and frozen human blood samples.

Authors:  Pokhraj Guha; Avishek Das; Somit Dutta; Tapas Kumar Chaudhuri
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.352

4.  Association of microRNA 17-92 cluster host gene (MIR17HG) polymorphisms with breast cancer.

Authors:  Diego Chacon-Cortes; Robert A Smith; Rodney A Lea; Philippa H Youl; Lyn R Griffiths
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-02-14

5.  SDC4-rs1981429 and ATM-rs228590 may provide early biomarkers of breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sofia I Vuorinen; Rachel K Okolicsanyi; Martina Gyimesi; Jacob Meyjes-Brown; Deepa Saini; Son H Pham; Lyn R Griffiths; Larisa M Haupt
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 4.322

6.  Association of KCNJ6 rs2070995 and methadone response for pain management in advanced cancer at end-of-life.

Authors:  Deniz Ozberk; Alison Haywood; Heidi G Sutherland; Chieh Yu; Cassie L Albury; Mathew Zunk; Rani George; Phillip Good; Lyn R Griffiths; Janet Hardy; Larisa M Haupt
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays.

Authors:  Linda Koshy; A L Anju; S Harikrishnan; V R Kutty; V T Jissa; Irin Kurikesu; Parvathy Jayachandran; A Jayakumaran Nair; A Gangaprasad; G M Nair; P R Sudhakaran
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  DNA methylation regulated microRNAs in HPV-16-induced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Authors:  M K Sannigrahi; Rajni Sharma; Varinder Singh; Naresh K Panda; Vidya Rattan; Madhu Khullar
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 3.396

9.  Implementation of the CDC translational informatics platform--from genetic variants to the national Swedish Rheumatology Quality Register.

Authors:  Imad Abugessaisa; David Gomez-Cabrero; Omri Snir; Staffan Lindblad; Lars Klareskog; Vivianne Malmström; Jesper Tegnér
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 5.531

10.  High yield gold nanoparticle-based DNA isolation method for human papillomaviruses genotypes from cervical cancer tissue samples.

Authors:  Noorossadat Seyyedi; Fatemeh Farjadian; Ali Farhadi; Gholamreza Rafiei Dehbidi; Reza Ranjbaran; Farahnaz Zare; Mohammad Ali Okhovat; Negin Nikouyan; Abbas Behzad-Behbahani
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.