Literature DB >> 22227912

Multicenter case-control study of the role of lens materials and care products on the development of corneal infiltrates.

Robin L Chalmers1, Lisa Keay, John McNally, Jami Kern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the association of symptomatic soft contact lens (SCL)-related corneal infiltrative events (CIEs) with SCL material, lens care products (LCPs), and other risk factors.
METHODS: Cases with symptomatic CIEs were identified in a retrospective, multicenter case-control study at five academic eye care centers. Each case was matched to three controls each who had received eye care near the time of the case's last full examination at that center but were not matched for demographic or other factors. Infiltrate status was established by an expert panel who were masked to sponsor, SCL, and LCP brand. Stratified analyses were conducted removing all daily disposable (DD) and all extended wear (EW) cases.
RESULTS: Clinical records from 166 patients with symptomatic CIEs and known EW status were included. Cases used >50 SCL brands and >10 LCP brands. Increased risk in univariate analysis for LCP was not significant after adjustment for other factors. In the multivariate analysis of all cases, use of reusable SCLs (4.03×; 95% C.I. 1.12 to 14.67) and EW (3.98×; 2.32 to 6.84) increased risk and patient age (per year older) was protective (0.96×; 0.94 to 0.98). Among daily wear cases (n = 102 cases), use of reusable SCLs (12.46×; 1.54 to 100.62) and silicone hydrogel (SiHy) (1.99×; 1.06 to 3.75) and age (0.95×: 0.92 to 0.97) were associated. Without DD cases (n = 162), EW (4.42×; 2.53 to 7.70), SiHy use (1.84×; 1.03 to 3.29), and patient age (0.96× 0.94 to 0.98) were significant factors. No specific SCL or LCP brands were associated with increased risk.
CONCLUSIONS: In this community-based trial, younger patients were at increased risk of infiltrative events. DD lenses were protective relative to reusable lenses. Overnight use increased risk in all analyses and silicone hydrogels increased risk in daily wearers, regardless of LCP brand. Improvements in lens storage case hygiene and environment may be a mechanism for reducing risk of CIEs related to SCL use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22227912     DOI: 10.1097/OPX.0b013e318240c7ff

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  14 in total

Review 1.  Tear exchange and contact lenses: a review.

Authors:  Alex Muntz; Lakshman N Subbaraman; Luigina Sorbara; Lyndon Jones
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-01-07

2.  A novel murine model for contact lens wear reveals clandestine IL-1R dependent corneal parainflammation and susceptibility to microbial keratitis upon inoculation with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Matteo M E Metruccio; Stephanie J Wan; Hart Horneman; Abby R Kroken; Aaron B Sullivan; Tan N Truong; James J Mun; Connie K P Tam; Robin Frith; Laurence Welsh; Melanie D George; Carol A Morris; David J Evans; Suzanne M J Fleiszig
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.033

3.  Topical Review: Contact Lens Eye Health and Safety Considerations in Government Policy Development.

Authors:  Carol Lakkis; Kathrine Osborn Lorenz; Michael Mayers
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 2.106

Review 4.  In Vivo Confocal Microscopy in Different Types of Dry Eye and Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Authors:  Ralene Sim; Kenneth Yong; Yu-Chi Liu; Louis Tong
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.964

5.  Long Day Wear Experience with Water Surface Daily Disposable Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Jennifer Swingle Fogt; Kimberly Patton
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2022-07-14

6.  Contact lens care solutions: a pilot study of ethnic differences in clinical signs and symptoms.

Authors:  Meng C Lin; Jenny Yuen; Andrew D Graham
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.018

7.  American Academy of Optometry Microbial Keratitis Think Tank.

Authors:  Loretta B Szczotka-Flynn; Joseph P Shovlin; Cristina M Schnider; Barbara E Caffery; Eduardo C Alfonso; Nicole A Carnt; Robin L Chalmers; Sarah Collier; Deborah S Jacobs; Charlotte E Joslin; Abby R Kroken; Carol Lakkis; Eric Pearlman; Oliver D Schein; Fiona Stapleton; Elmer Tu; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.106

8.  The COVID-19 pandemic: Important considerations for contact lens practitioners.

Authors:  Lyndon Jones; Karen Walsh; Mark Willcox; Philip Morgan; Jason Nichols
Journal:  Cont Lens Anterior Eye       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  A Survey of Contact Lens Wearers and Eye Care Professionals on Satisfaction with a New Smart-Surface Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens.

Authors:  Timothy Grant; Anson Tang
Journal:  Clin Optom (Auckl)       Date:  2020-01-14

10.  Tear cytokine response to multipurpose solutions for contact lenses.

Authors:  Carolyn M Kalsow; William T Reindel; Mohinder M Merchea; Kirk M Bateman; Joseph T Barr
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-06-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.