OBJECTIVES: To explore whether a ratio of positive to negative affect, from the work of Fredricksen and Losada, could predict high levels of well-being in elderly samples and especially in nursing home residents despite multiple chronic health conditions, consonant with Ryff and Singer's notion of "flourishing under fire." METHOD: We used two samples: a probability sample of community-residing elders and a sample from nursing homes. We calculated ratios of positive to negative affect in each sample and measured well-being with social interaction, mental health, life satisfaction, and general well-being. RESULTS: The positivity ratio of 2.9 differentiated high levels of well-being in both the samples, as in previous research on younger samples. DISCUSSION: Although we expected the positivity ratio to perform less well among nursing home residents, we found that it differentiated residents with high well-being just as well as in the community sample. The ability to regulate positive affect to maintain a relative ratio of positive over negative affect appears to be an important aspect of successful adjustment in late life. Further research is needed on objective indicators of quality of life and on whether intra-individual shifts in affect balance are coupled with shifts in indicators of positive mental health.
OBJECTIVES: To explore whether a ratio of positive to negative affect, from the work of Fredricksen and Losada, could predict high levels of well-being in elderly samples and especially in nursing home residents despite multiple chronic health conditions, consonant with Ryff and Singer's notion of "flourishing under fire." METHOD: We used two samples: a probability sample of community-residing elders and a sample from nursing homes. We calculated ratios of positive to negative affect in each sample and measured well-being with social interaction, mental health, life satisfaction, and general well-being. RESULTS: The positivity ratio of 2.9 differentiated high levels of well-being in both the samples, as in previous research on younger samples. DISCUSSION: Although we expected the positivity ratio to perform less well among nursing home residents, we found that it differentiated residents with high well-being just as well as in the community sample. The ability to regulate positive affect to maintain a relative ratio of positive over negative affect appears to be an important aspect of successful adjustment in late life. Further research is needed on objective indicators of quality of life and on whether intra-individual shifts in affect balance are coupled with shifts in indicators of positive mental health.
Authors: Kimberly Van Haitsma; Katherine M Abbott; Annabelle Arbogast; Lauren R Bangerter; Allison R Heid; Liza L Behrens; Caroline Madrigal Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2020-04-02
Authors: Ann M Kolanowski; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Suzanne Meeks; Mark Litaker Journal: Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen Date: 2014-01-08 Impact factor: 2.035
Authors: Ann Kolanowski; Liza Behrens; Erik Lehman; Zita Oravecz; Barbara Resnick; Marie Boltz; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Elizabeth Galik; Jeanette Ellis; Karen Eshraghi Journal: Res Gerontol Nurs Date: 2019-08-27 Impact factor: 1.571
Authors: Mary D Naylor; Karen B Hirschman; Alexandra L Hanlon; Katherine M Abbott; Kathryn H Bowles; Janice Foust; Shivani Shah; Cynthia Zubritsky Journal: J Am Med Dir Assoc Date: 2015-09-26 Impact factor: 4.669
Authors: Suzanne Meeks; Kimberly Van Haitsma; Benjamin T Mast; Steven Arnold; Joel E Streim; Sandra Sephton; Patrick J Smith; Morton Kleban; Michael Rovine Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2015-08-03 Impact factor: 3.658