M Horiguchi1, H Y Meltzer. 1. Division of Psychopharmacology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
Abstract
RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs), many of which are direct or indirect serotonin (5-HT)(1A) agonists, and tandospirone, a 5-HT(1A) partial agonist, have been reported to improve cognition in schizophrenia. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We tested the effect of 5-HT(1A) agonism, alone, and in combination with other psychotropic agents, including the atypical APD, lurasidone, in reversing the deficit in novel object recognition (NOR) induced by subchronic treatment with the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, phencyclidine (PCP) (2 mg/kg, b.i.d., for 7 days). RESULTS: Subchronic treatment with PCP induced a persistent NOR deficit. Lurasidone (0.1 mg/kg), a potent 5-HT(1A) partial agonist, 5-HT(2A) antagonist, and weaker D(2) antagonist, tandospirone (0.6 mg/kg), and the selective post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) agonist, F15599 (0.16 mg/kg), ameliorated the subchronic PCP-induced-NOR deficit. The 5-HT(1A) antagonist, WAY100635 (0.6 mg/kg), blocked the ameliorating effects of tandospirone and lurasidone. The combination of sub-effective doses of tandospirone (0.2 mg/kg) and lurasidone (0.03 mg/kg) also reversed the PCP-induced NOR-deficit. Buspirone, a less potent partial 5-HT(1A) agonist than tandospirone, was less effective. Co-administration of tandospirone (0.2 mg/kg) and pimavanserin (3 mg/kg), a relatively selective 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonist, did not reverse the effect of sub-chronic PCP on NOR. The D(2) antagonist, haloperidol, blocked the ameliorating effect of tandospirone on the PCP-induced deficit in NOR. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that 5-HT(1A) agonism is adequate to ameliorate the PCP-induced impairment in NOR and suggest further study of utilizing the combination of a 5-HT(1A) agonist and an atypical APD to ameliorate some types of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.
RATIONALE: Atypical antipsychotic drugs (APDs), many of which are direct or indirect serotonin (5-HT)(1A) agonists, and tandospirone, a 5-HT(1A) partial agonist, have been reported to improve cognition in schizophrenia. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: We tested the effect of 5-HT(1A) agonism, alone, and in combination with other psychotropic agents, including the atypical APD, lurasidone, in reversing the deficit in novel object recognition (NOR) induced by subchronic treatment with the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, phencyclidine (PCP) (2 mg/kg, b.i.d., for 7 days). RESULTS: Subchronic treatment with PCP induced a persistent NOR deficit. Lurasidone (0.1 mg/kg), a potent 5-HT(1A) partial agonist, 5-HT(2A) antagonist, and weaker D(2) antagonist, tandospirone (0.6 mg/kg), and the selective post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) agonist, F15599 (0.16 mg/kg), ameliorated the subchronic PCP-induced-NOR deficit. The 5-HT(1A) antagonist, WAY100635 (0.6 mg/kg), blocked the ameliorating effects of tandospirone and lurasidone. The combination of sub-effective doses of tandospirone (0.2 mg/kg) and lurasidone (0.03 mg/kg) also reversed the PCP-induced NOR-deficit. Buspirone, a less potent partial 5-HT(1A) agonist than tandospirone, was less effective. Co-administration of tandospirone (0.2 mg/kg) and pimavanserin (3 mg/kg), a relatively selective 5-HT(2A) receptor inverse agonist, did not reverse the effect of sub-chronic PCP on NOR. The D(2) antagonist, haloperidol, blocked the ameliorating effect of tandospirone on the PCP-induced deficit in NOR. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that 5-HT(1A) agonism is adequate to ameliorate the PCP-induced impairment in NOR and suggest further study of utilizing the combination of a 5-HT(1A) agonist and an atypical APD to ameliorate some types of cognitive impairment in schizophrenia.
Authors: T Sumiyoshi; M Matsui; I Yamashita; S Nohara; T Uehara; M Kurachi; H Y Meltzer Journal: J Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 3.153
Authors: T Sumiyoshi; M Matsui; S Nohara; I Yamashita; M Kurachi; C Sumiyoshi; K Jayathilake; H Y Meltzer Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2001-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Johannes Tauscher; Shitij Kapur; N Paul L G Verhoeff; Douglas F Hussey; Zafiris J Daskalakis; Sitra Tauscher-Wisniewski; Alan A Wilson; Sylvain Houle; Siegfried Kasper; Robert B Zipursky Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2002-06
Authors: Jean Louis Maurel; Jean-Marie Autin; Philippe Funes; Adrian Newman-Tancredi; Francis Colpaert; Bernard Vacher Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2007-09-06 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Stefania Bonaccorso; Herbert Y Meltzer; Zhu Li; Jin Dai; Anna R Alboszta; Junji Ichikawa Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Masakuni Horiguchi; Kayleen E Hannaway; Adesewa E Adelekun; Karu Jayathilake; Herbert Y Meltzer Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Sanna K Janhunen; Heta Svärd; John Talpos; Gaurav Kumar; Thomas Steckler; Niels Plath; Linda Lerdrup; Trine Ruby; Marie Haman; Roger Wyler; Theresa M Ballard Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2015-06-14 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Su M Park; Meng Chen; Claire M Schmerberg; Russell S Dulman; Ramona M Rodriguiz; Marc G Caron; Jian Jin; William C Wetsel Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2015-07-01 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: Jianjun Cheng; Patrick M Giguere; Claire M Schmerberg; Vladimir M Pogorelov; Ramona M Rodriguiz; Xi-Ping Huang; Hu Zhu; John D McCorvy; William C Wetsel; Bryan L Roth; Alan P Kozikowski Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Matteo M Pusceddu; Mariana Barboza; Ciara E Keogh; Melinda Schneider; Patricia Stokes; Jessica A Sladek; Hyun Jung D Kim; Cristina Torres-Fuentes; Lily R Goldfild; Shane E Gillis; Ingrid Brust-Mascher; Gonzalo Rabasa; Kyle A Wong; Carlito Lebrilla; Mariana X Byndloss; Charles Maisonneuve; Andreas J Bäumler; Dana J Philpott; Richard L Ferrero; Kim E Barrett; Colin Reardon; Mélanie G Gareau Journal: J Physiol Date: 2019-11-27 Impact factor: 5.182